Comparison of Absorbable Synthetic and Catgut Suture Material in Episiotomy Repair
Comparison of the Outcome (in Terms of Healing) Between Absorbable Synthetic and Catgut Suture Material in Episiotomy Repair.
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is paucity of local literature regarding the most appropriate absorbable suture material for episiotomy repair despite the fact that tremendous number of women undergo the procedure daily. Hence, the current study was planned aiming to compare the outcome between absorbable synthetic and catgut suture material in episiotomy repair.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2026
CompletedMay 7, 2026
May 1, 2026
6 months
May 1, 2026
May 1, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Post-operative pain
Pain was measured on the visual analog scale, with 0 as no pain, 1-3 as mild, 4-7 as moderate, and 8-10 as severe pain. Frequencies of all categories were noted.
6 weeks
Wound infection
The frequency of patients developing a wound infection was noted.
6 weeks
Wound dehiscence
The frequency of patients who experienced episiotomy wound ruptures and opened up along a surgical incision was noted.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group-A
EXPERIMENTALPatients went through suturing with absorbable synthetic suture.
Group-B
EXPERIMENTALPatients went through suturing with catgut.
Interventions
Patients went through suturing with absorbable synthetic suture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Aged 20-40 years
- Gestational age 37-42 weeks (assessed on last menstrual period)
You may not qualify if:
- Premature rupture of membranes
- Preterm vaginal delivery
- Twin gestation
- Operative delivery
- Vulval hematoma
- Vaginal tears
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sadiq Abbasi Hospital
Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, 63100, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Komal Iqbal
Sadiq Abbasi Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Saba Nadeem, FCPS
Sadiq Abbasi Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2026
First Posted
May 7, 2026
Study Start
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion
August 31, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
May 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data can be shared on a reasonable request.