NCT07570342

Brief Summary

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of assisted oocyte activation (AOA) using Ca²⁺ ionophores in cases of total fertilization failure (TFF) due to oocyte activation deficiency (OAD). The study will be conducted in two phases: Phase I will compare the fertilization rates of oocytes exposed to two types of Ca²⁺ ionophore treatments- Ionomycin solution and commercially available CultActive-against a control group without calcium ionophore treatment. Phase II will assess whether an additional injection of CaCl2, prior to exposure to the chosen ionophore from Phase I, further improves fertilization outcomes. The goal is to identify the optimal AOA protocol for improving fertilization rates and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach in relation to ploidy, with a focus on ensuring normal pre-implantation embryo development.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress3%
Apr 2026Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 30, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 6, 2026

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

May 6, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

ICSIPGT-Aartificial oocyte activationAOAcalcium ionophoreionomycinTESEImmotile spermFailed fertilization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Fertilization rates and abnormal fertilization.

    The primary endpoint is the proportion of metaphase II (MII) oocytes that achieve normal fertilisation (2 pronuclei; 2PN) following insemination or ICSI, compared across study groups. Additionally, the incidence of abnormal fertilisation (e.g., 0PN, 1PN, ≥3PN) will be evaluated. Fertilisation assessment will be performed at the standard time point of 16-20 hours post-insemination/ICSI.

    16-20 hours post-insemination/ICSI

  • Oocyte Degeneration Rate

    The proportion of metaphase II (MII) oocytes that undergo degeneration following ICSI across the study groups. Degeneration will be assessed at the standard post-ICSI evaluation time point, and expressed as the percentage of injected oocytes exhibiting morphological signs of degeneration.

    24 hours post-ICSI

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Usable Blastocyst Rate

    7 days post fertilization

  • Blastocyst Quality at Time of Biopsy

    7 days post fertilization

  • Blastocyst Ploidy on Day 5, 6, or 7

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 week

Study Arms (3)

Group 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActive

OTHER

Oocytes are cultured immediately after injection in a pre-calibrated OA-CultActive dish for 15 min in CO2 incubator, then injected oocytes are rinsed well in culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in GT-culture medium. Then transferred to the numbered droplet or well.

Other: Group 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActive

Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) Ionomycin

OTHER

Oocytes are placed immediately after injection in a pre-calibrated OA-Ionomycin dish (dish 1) for 7 - 10 min in CO2 incubator, then they are rinsed well and placed in another culture dish (dish 2) for 25 min in CO2 incubator. Then MIIs are exposed again in OA-Ionomycin dish for 10 min, then they are rinsed well and placed into culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in GT-culture medium. Then transferred to the numbered droplet or well.

Other: Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) Ionomycin

Group 3: Control

OTHER

Oocytes are cultured as per routine practice after injection in culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in routine culture GT-culture medium.

Other: Group 3: Control

Interventions

Oocytes are cultured immediately after injection in a pre-calibrated OA-CultActive dish for 15 min in CO2 incubator, then injected oocytes are rinsed well in culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in GT-culture medium. Then transferred to the numbered droplet or well.

Group 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActive

Oocytes are placed immediately after injection in a pre-calibrated OA-Ionomycin dish (dish 1) for 7 - 10 min in CO2 incubator, then they are rinsed well and placed in another culture dish (dish 2) for 25 min in CO2 incubator. Then MIIs are exposed again in OA-Ionomycin dish for 10 min, then they are rinsed well and placed into culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in GT-culture medium. Then transferred to the numbered droplet or well.

Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) Ionomycin

Oocytes are cultured as per routine practice after injection in culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in routine culture GT-culture medium.

Group 3: Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 43 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles when ICSI is indicated.
  • Patients with a minimum of 3 MII oocytes after denudation.
  • Maternal age 18-43 years old.
  • PGT-A cycles with only trophectoderm biopsies on day 5/6/7.
  • BMI\<35.
  • Fresh and frozen immotile ejaculated sperm.
  • Fresh and frozen TESE sperm (motile and immotile).
  • Globozoospermia.
  • \. Couples undergoing ICSI due to poor fertilization history (≤30%), or previous fertilization failure.

You may not qualify if:

  • PGT-M/SR cycles.
  • Fresh and frozen motile ejaculated / FNA sperm.
  • IVF inseminated oocytes.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (24)

  • 24. Yeste M, Jones C, Amdani SN, Patel S, Coward K. Oocyte activation deficiency: a role for an oocyte contribution? Hum Reprod Update 2016a Jan-Feb;22:23-47.

    RESULT
  • 23. Ye Y, Li N, Yan X, Wu R, Zhou W, Cheng L, Li Y. Genetic analysis of embryo in a human case of spontaneous oocyte activation: a case report. Gynecol Endocrinol 2020;36:294-296.

    RESULT
  • 22. Yang X, Shu L, Cai L, Sun X, Cui Y, Liu J. Homozygous missense mutation Arg207Cys in the WEE2 gene causes female infertility and fertilization failure. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019;36:965-971.

    RESULT
  • 21. Tosti E, Me ne zo Y. Gamete activation: basic knowledge and clinical applications. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22:420-439.

    RESULT
  • 20. Tiegs AW, Tao X, Landis J, Zhan Y, Franasiak JM, Seli E, Wells D, Fragouli E, Scott RT. Sperm mitochondrial DNA copy number is not a predictor of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle outcomes. Reprod Sci 2020;27:1350-1356.

    RESULT
  • 19. Tesarik J, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Mendoza C, Greco E. Use of a modified intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique to overcome spermborne and oocyte-borne oocyte activation failures. Fertil Steril 2002;78:619-624.

    RESULT
  • 18. Santella L, Dale B. Assisted yes, but where do we draw the line? Reprod Biomed Online 2015;31:476-478.

    RESULT
  • 17. Sang Q, Li B, Kuang Y, Wang X, Zhang Z, Chen B, Wu L, Lyu Q, Fu Y, Yan Z et al. Homozygous mutations in WEE2 cause fertilization failure and female infertility. Am J Hum Genet 2018;102:649-657.

    RESULT
  • 16. Montag M, Ko ̈ ster M, van der Ven K, Bohlen U, van der Ven H. The benefit of artificial oocyte activation is dependent on the fertilization rate in a previous treatment cycle. Reproductive Biomed Online 2012;24:521-526.

    RESULT
  • 15. Mateizel I, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Tournaye H, Belva F. Obstetric and neonatal outcome following ICSI with assisted oocyte activation by Ca2+ ionophore treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018;35:1005-1010.

    RESULT
  • 14. Karabulut S, Aks ̈ unger ̈ O, Ata C, Sag ıroglu Y, Keskin _I. I _. Artificial oocyte activation with Ca2+ ionophore for frozen sperm cycles. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2018;64:381-388.

    RESULT
  • 13. Kashir J, Nomikos M, Lai FA. Phospholipase C zeta and Ca2+ oscillations at fertilisation: the evidence, applications, and further questions. Adv Biol Regul 2018;67:148-162.

    RESULT
  • 12. Kashir J, Mistry BV, BuSaleh L, Abu-Dawas R, Nomikos M, Ajlan A, Abu-Dawud R, AlYacoub N, AlHassan S, Lai FA et al. Phospholipase C zeta profiles are indicative of optimal sperm parameters and fertilisation success in patients undergoing fertility treatment. Andrology 2020b;8:1143-1159.

    RESULT
  • 11. Kashir J. Increasing associations between defects in phospholipase C zeta and conditions of male infertility: not just ICSI failure? J Assist Reprod Genet 2020;37:1273-1293.

    RESULT
  • 10. Kamath et al. Oocyte activation for women following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 2021(6): CD014040. Published online 2021 Jun 19. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014040

    RESULT
  • 9. Lundin K et al. Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine† ESHRE Add-ons working group Human Reproduction 2023; 38:2062-2104, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead184.

    RESULT
  • Kashir J, Ganesh D, Jones C, Coward K. Oocyte activation deficiency and assisted oocyte activation: mechanisms, obstacles and prospects for clinical application. Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Feb 7;2022(2):hoac003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac003. eCollection 2022.

  • 7. Heindryckx B, De Gheselle S, Gerris J, Dhont M, De Sutter P. Efficiency of assisted oocyte activation as a solution for failed intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:662-668.

    RESULT
  • 6. Ebner T, Montag M, Montag M, Van der Ven K, Van der Ven H, Ebner T, Shebl O, Oppelt P, Hirchenhain J, Krüssel J et al. Live birth after artificial oocyte activation using a ready-to-use ionophore: a prospective multicentre study. Reprod BioMed Online 2015;30:359-365.

    RESULT
  • 5. Capalbo A, Ottolini CS, Griffin DK, Ubaldi FM, Handyside AH, Rienzi L. Artificial oocyte activation with Ca2+ ionophore does not cause a widespread increase in chromosome segregation errors in the second meiotic division of the oocyte. Fertil Steril 2016;105:807-814.e2.

    RESULT
  • 4. Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA 2015;313:255-263.

    RESULT
  • 3. Bonte D, Ferrer-Buitrago M, Dhaenens L, Popovic M, Thys V, De Croo I, De Gheselle S, Steyaert N, Boel A, Vanden Meerschaut F et al. Assisted oocyte activation significantly increases fertilization and pregnancy outcome in patients with low and total failed fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a 17-year retrospective study. Fertil Steril 2019;112:266-274.

    RESULT
  • 2. Bassiri F, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Forozanfar M, Tavalaee M. Relationship between sperm parameters with sperm function tests in infertile men with at least one failed cycle after intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. Int J Fertil Steril 2020;13:324-329.

    RESULT
  • 1. Aksunger O, Erturk OK, Olgan S, Aydinuraz B, Dirican EK. Artificial oocyte activation after intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study. Human Fertility 2016;19:282-288.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infertility, Male

Interventions

Ionomycin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesInfertilityMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipids

Study Officials

  • BARBARA LAWRENZ

    ART Fertility Clinics LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

JONALYN EDADES, EMBA Healthcare Management

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Embryologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2026

First Posted

May 6, 2026

Study Start

April 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

May 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03