Core Stabilization and Kinesthetic Training in Diplegic CP
Comparative Effects of Core Stabilization Exercises and Kinesthetic Training in Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of core stabilization exercises (CSE) and kinesthetic training (KT) on postural control in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (GMFCS Level III), aged 4-8 years. Cerebral palsy was recognized as a non-progressive neurological disorder that affects movement, posture, and motor function, often leading to impaired balance, reduced trunk control, and decreased functional independence. Postural instability was identified as a key concern in diplegic CP, and effective rehabilitation strategies were considered essential to improve mobility and daily functioning. Core stabilization exercises focused on strengthening deep trunk muscles to enhance stability and alignment, whereas kinesthetic training emphasized proprioceptive awareness and neuromuscular coordination to improve movement accuracy and balance. Although both interventions had shown benefits individually, their comparative effectiveness remained unclear. A total of 32 participants were recruited using purposive sampling and were randomly assigned into two groups: CSE (n=16) and KT (n=16). Both groups received conventional physiotherapy for 15 minutes followed by 30 minutes of their respective interventions, three times per week for 12 weeks. Outcome assessment was conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (6 weeks), and post-intervention (12 weeks) using the Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBBS) to evaluate static and dynamic balance. Data were analyzed using SPSS, applying paired t-tests for within-group comparisons and independent t-tests for between-group analysis, with significance set at p \< 0.05. This study aimed to determine the more effective intervention for improving balance and functional outcomes, thereby supporting evidence-based clinical practice in pediatric rehabilitation. A total of 32 participants will be recruited using purposive sampling and randomly assigned into two groups: CSE (n=16) and KT (n=16). Both groups will receive conventional physiotherapy for 15 minutes followed by 30 minutes of their respective interventions, three times per week for 12 weeks. Outcome assessment will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (6 weeks), and post-intervention (12 weeks) using the Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBBS) to evaluate static and dynamic balance. Data will be analyzed using SPSS, applying paired t-tests for within-group comparisons and independent t-tests for between-group analysis, with significance set at p \< 0.05. This study aims to determine the more effective intervention for improving balance and functional outcomes, thereby supporting evidence-based clinical practice in pediatric rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 8, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 9, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2026
CompletedMay 6, 2026
April 1, 2026
7 months
April 28, 2026
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Balance Control is measured using the PBBS to evaluate both static and dynamic postural stability.
The Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBBS) is a standardized clinical assessment used to measure functional balance and postural control in children with motor challenges. It consists of 14 distinct tasks that mimic activities of daily living, including the ability to sit and stand without support, transfer between chairs, reach forward, and pick up objects from the floor. Each task is evaluated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where a higher score reflects a greater level of independence and stability. With a maximum total score of 56, the PBBS serves as a reliable tool for tracking a child's progress over time and determining the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. In this clinical trial, the scale is utilized at baseline, week 6, and week 12 to provide a clear quantitative record of the participant's balance improvements.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Core Stabilization Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group received a core stabilization exercise program focusing on deep abdominal and back muscles. The protocol included the plank, bird-dog, and dead bug exercises, which were performed three times per week for four weeks.
Kinesthetic Training Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group underwent kinesthetic training aimed at improving proprioception and joint position sense. This included weight-shifting and balance activities on stable and unstable surfaces, which were performed three times per week for four weeks.
Interventions
A 4-week exercise program focusing on deep abdominal and back muscles. Sessions are 45 minutes each, 3 times per week. Exercises include The Plank (front and side), Bird-Dog, and Dead Bug. Progression will be managed by increasing hold times and repetitions as the patient's stability improves.
A 4-week sensory-motor training program designed to improve proprioception and balance. Sessions are 45 minutes each, 3 times per week. Activities include single-limb standing, weight shifting on stable and unstable surfaces (like foam pads), and coordinated limb movements to enhance joint position sense and postural control.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spastic diplegic CP
- GMFCS Level III
- Age range: 4 to 8 years
- Must have verbal communication
- Ability to follow verbal commands
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive impairment
- History of epilepsy or seizures in the past 3 months.
- Children with progressive neurological or genetic disorders (e.g., muscular dystrophy).
- Any acute respiratory infection or chronic pulmonary disease
- Any visual or auditory impairments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sehat Medical Complex, Pediatric Rehabilitation Department, ULTH.
Lahore, Punjab Province, 42000, Pakistan
Related Publications (2)
Eliasson, A. C., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Rösblad, B., Beckung, E., Arner, M., Ohrvall, A. M., & Rosenbaum, P. (2006). The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol, 48(7), 549-554.
BACKGROUNDAkay, T., & Murray, A. J. (2021). Relative contribution of proprioceptive and vestibular sensory systems to locomotion: opportunities for discovery in the age of molecular science. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(3), 1467.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2026
First Posted
May 6, 2026
Study Start
August 8, 2025
Primary Completion
March 9, 2026
Study Completion
April 10, 2026
Last Updated
May 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share