How TENS Affects Pain, Medication Use, and Muscle Function in Older Adults With Hip Fractures
TENS-HIP
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Pain and Analgesic Use and the Association of Clinical and Psychosocial Factors With Muscle Function in Older Adults With Hip Fracture
1 other identifier
interventional
32
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce perioperative pain in older adults with hip fractures. It will also evaluate its effects on physiological and psychological outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does adding TENS to usual care during the preoperative phase reduce pain intensity and analgesic consumption? Does TENS affect pressure pain threshold and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate)? Researchers will compare active TENS to sham TENS (no perceptible stimulation) to see if TENS is effective in reducing pain and improving related outcomes. Participants will:
- Undergo a standardized baseline assessment, including evaluation of pain, vital signs, anxiety, discomfort, and pressure pain threshold
- Complete questionnaires assessing quality of life, physical activity, depressive symptoms, anxiety, fear of falling, and pain catastrophizing
- Be randomly assigned to receive either active TENS or sham TENS
- Receive a single 45-minute TENS session
- Have their analgesic use recorded for the 24 hours before and after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 22, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 28, 2027
May 5, 2026
May 1, 2026
7 months
April 22, 2026
May 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Pain intensity
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Before and immediately after the intervention (single session)
Pressure pain threshold
Pressure pain threshold will be measured using a pressure algometer.
Before and immediately after the intervention
Blood pressure
Blood pressure will be measured before and after the intervention.
Before and immediately after the intervention
Analgesic consumption
Analgesic use will be assessed based on the type and quantity of medications recorded in medical records.
24 hours before and 24 hours after the intervention
Quality of life (SF-36)
Quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Baseline (pre-intervention)
Physical activity level (IPAQ)
Physical activity level will be assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), expressed in MET-minutes/week. Higher values indicate higher levels of physical activity.
Baseline
Depressive symptoms
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), ranging from 0 to 15, where higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Baseline
Anxiety symptoms
Anxiety will be assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), ranging from 20 to 80, where higher scores indicate greater anxiety levels.
Baseline
Fear of falling
Fear of falling will be assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), ranging from 16 to 64, where higher scores indicate greater concern about falling.
Baseline
Pain catastrophizing
Pain catastrophizing will be assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), ranging from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate greater levels of catastrophizing.
Baseline
Heart rate
Heart rate will be measured before and after the intervention.
Before and immediately after the intervention
Respiratory rate
Respiratory rate will be measured before and after the intervention.
Before and immediately after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Active TENS
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 1 will receive active TENS, with intensity adjusted to the maximum level tolerated by the participant.
Sham TENS
SHAM COMPARATORGroup 2 will receive sham TENS, with intensity adjusted to a sub-sensory level (no perceptible stimulation).
Interventions
Active transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) will be applied for 45 minutes, with intensity adjusted to the maximum level tolerated by the participant.
Sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) will be applied for 45 minutes, with intensity set at a sub-sensory level, with no perceptible stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Older adults (male and female) diagnosed with hip fracture
- Age ≥ 60 years
- Admitted to the hospital inpatient unit (HPS)
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 20
You may not qualify if:
- Conditions contraindicating electrical stimulation, such as presence of a pacemaker, significant sensory loss in the lower limbs, or skin lesions at the electrode placement site
- History of neurological or cognitive impairment that may interfere with understanding of the assessments
- Previous treatment with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the lower limb within the last 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participant randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random sequence. Allocation concealment will be ensured using opaque, sealed, and sequentially numbered envelopes, which will be opened only at the time of the intervention. The outcome assessor will remain blinded to group allocation to minimize bias during data collection.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2026
First Posted
May 5, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
May 22, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 28, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 28, 2027
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05