Teaching Diabetes Management Using Two Different Methods
Teaching
The Effects of Teaching Diabetes Management to Nursing Students Using Two Different Methods on Knowledge Level, Critical Thinking, and Self-Efficacy
2 other identifiers
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is essential to evaluate teaching methods and include comprehensive teaching components for optimal educational outcomes. Accordingly, this study will evaluate the effect of teaching diabetes management to nursing students using two different methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2026
CompletedMay 4, 2026
April 1, 2026
2 months
April 24, 2026
April 30, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Diabetes Knowledge Test
The knowledge test will consist of 20 questions on the physiology, signs, and treatment of septic shock. The questions in the knowledge test will be sent to 5 experts for review, and content validity will be established.
4 week
Critical Thinking Tendency Scale
The "Critical Thinking Tendency Scale" was developed in 2012 by Karalı and Battal to measure critical thinking tendencies. The CTTS is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 21 items. The scale has two sub-dimensions: "Skills Dimension" and "Values Dimension". The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.91 (Karalı and Battal, 2012). The highest possible score on the "Skills" subscale of the "Critical Thinking Tendency Scale" is 60, and the lowest is 12. The highest possible score on the "Values" subscale is 45, and the lowest is 9. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.91.
4 week
Self-Efficacy Scale
The scale is unidimensional and consists of 10 positive items, therefore it does not contain reverse-coded items. Each item is given a score between 1 and 4, in equal intervals. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale adapted into Turkish and whose validity and reliability analyses were performed by Yurtçiçek Eren and Başgöl was found to be 0.81.
4 week
Study Arms (3)
jigsaw
EXPERIMENTALStudents in the jigsaw group will be divided into 5 groups of six. Then, the topic content will be divided into five outlines (diabetes classification/symptoms and signs, diabetes treatment (nutrition and exercise), diabetes treatment (insulin and oral antidiabetics), acute and chronic complications of diabetes, patient education in diabetes), and each member of each jigsaw group will be assigned to a specific outline. Students will be asked to study all the material by looking more closely at the given topic. Then, all students assigned to the same outline in the 5 jigsaw groups will be gathered in a group called the "expert group." In this expert group, each student will be asked to share and discuss the information they have gained regarding the specific outline with the other students.
case based
EXPERIMENTALThe researcher will provide the students with 5 examples, and five case studies will be conducted with the students in the case-based learning group (cases will include information such as the patient's detailed history, medical diagnosis, a brief summary of the disease, and the medications the patient is using). The case studies used will contain the basic details of diabetes. Necessary background information will be provided, and discussion questions will be determined.
control
NO INTERVENTIONControl group: Students in the control group will not be given the simulation exercise; they will only fill out data collection forms during two designated time periods.
Interventions
Students in the jigsaw group will be divided into 5 groups of six. Then, the topic content will be divided into five outlines (diabetes classification/symptoms and signs, diabetes treatment (nutrition and exercise), diabetes treatment (insulin and oral antidiabetics), acute and chronic complications of diabetes, patient education in diabetes), and each member of each jigsaw group will be assigned to a specific outline. Students will be asked to study all the material by looking more closely at the given topic. Then, all students assigned to the same outline in the 5 jigsaw groups will be gathered in a group called the "expert group." In this expert group, each student will be asked to share and discuss the information they have gained regarding the specific outline with the other students.
The researcher will provide the students with 5 examples, and five case studies will be conducted with the students in the case-based learning group (cases will include information such as the patient's detailed history, medical diagnosis, a brief summary of the disease, and the medications the patient is using). The case studies used will contain the basic details of diabetes. Necessary background information will be provided, and discussion questions will be determined.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Students enrolled in the Internal Medicine Nursing course during the 2023-2024 academic year,
- Students who attended the "diabetes management" theoretical course in Internal Medicine Nursing,
- Students who agreed to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Students who did not participate in the theoretical and jigsaw/case-based learning application phases of the study,
- Students who did not give their consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AmasyaU
Amasya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2026
First Posted
May 4, 2026
Study Start
October 15, 2025
Primary Completion
December 15, 2025
Study Completion
January 16, 2026
Last Updated
May 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04