NCT07561944

Brief Summary

Individuals with upper limb functional impairments, such as those resulting from stroke, spinal cord injury, musculoskeletal disorders, or degenerative joint disease, often experience difficulties operating smartphones. Standard devices typically require bilateral, precise fine motor control, which can limit independence, participation, and access to digital communication for this population. Although assistive products such as phone stands, straps, or styluses are available, they are often designed as "one-size-fits-all," lack individualization, and may not be well integrated into daily life. Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers advantages of customization, modularity, low cost, and rapid production, and may support better matching between users and assistive devices. However, in clinical practice, the use of 3D-printed assistive technology is constrained by the lack of an integrated resource platform and standardized fitting procedures. This exploratory intervention study aims to develop a 3D assistive device selection interface and a standardized fitting process for smartphone-related devices targeting adults with upper limb dysfunction. Approximately 30 outpatients will be recruited from a regional teaching hospital in northern Taiwan and will receive a 1-week intervention using a 3D-printed mobile phone holder or related assistive device, with occupational therapist support. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will examine smartphone task performance and satisfaction with the assistive technology. Feasibility, usability, and preliminary effectiveness will be evaluated to inform the development of a sustainable clinical service model.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
7mo left

Started Jun 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 24, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2026

Expected
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2026

Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 24, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Smartphone Functional Performance Test

    A task-based performance assessment designed based on Fairman et al. (2025) and Lu et al. (2017) to evaluate the efficiency of smartphone hardware operations. Tasks include: (1) calling a contact, (2) dialing a number, (3) answering a call, (4) sending a text message, and (5) taking a photo. Outcome metrics include completion time, number of steps, error rate, and step completeness. Higher performance indicates improved smartphone-operating ability when using the 3D-printed assistive device.

    Baseline and 1 week after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    Baseline and 1 week

  • Active Range of Motion (AROM) of Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, and Fingers

    Baseline and 1 week

  • NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX)

    Baseline and 1 week

  • Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)

    1 week

  • Daily Usage and Activity Log

    Daily for 1 week

Study Arms (1)

3D-Printed Assistive Device Group

Participants will use a 3D-printed smartphone assistive device for at least 30 minutes daily for 1 week. Therapists will provide two intervention sessions for instruction, activity adjustment, and monitoring. Participants will record daily usage and upload photos via an online platform to support adherence and follow-up.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

This study will recruit adults with upper limb functional impairments who are currently receiving occupational therapy in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Eligible participants must have an onset of more than three months, report difficulties or functional needs related to smartphone use due to upper limb impairment, and demonstrate adequate cognitive ability to follow instructions (Montreal Cognitive Assessment \[MoCA\] score \> 24). Individuals younger than 18 years, those with severe visual or hearing impairments, or those with unstable medical conditions that may interfere with participation will be excluded.

You may qualify if:

  • Currently receiving occupational therapy in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
  • Onset of condition \> 3 months.
  • Presence of upper-limb functional impairment that causes difficulty or limitations in smartphone use.
  • Able to understand instructions for using the assistive device.
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score \> 24.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age younger than 18 years.
  • Severe visual or hearing impairments that would affect the ability to perform smartphone tasks.
  • Unstable medical condition that may interfere with participation in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

New Taipei City, New Taipei, 235, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Widehammar, C., Lidström, H., & Hermansson, L. (2019). Environmental barriers to participation and facilitators for use of three types of assistive technology devices. Assistive technology, 31(2), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2017.1363828

    BACKGROUND
  • Pollock, A., Farmer, S. E., Brady, M. C., Langhorne, P., Mead, G. E., Mehrholz, J., & Van Wijck, F. (2014). Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane database of systematic reviews(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2

    RESULT
  • Marrie, R. A., Cutter, G. R., Tyry, T., Cofield, S. S., Fox, R., & Salter, A. (2017). Upper limb impairment is associated with use of assistive devices and unemployment in multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 13, 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2017.02.013

    RESULT
  • MA, L., & PAN, Z. (2018). The Chinese version of the subjective load assessment method and the US National aeronautics and space administration task load index scales for assessing the reliability and validity of physicians' mental loads in tertiary hospitals. Chinese General Practice, 21(33), 4127. https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.236

    RESULT
  • Lu, E. C., Wang, R., Huq, R., Gardner, D., Karam, P., Zabjek, K., Hébert, D., Boger, J., & Mihailidis, A. (2011). Development of a robotic device for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: A user-centered design approach. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 2(4), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13230-012-0009-0

    RESULT
  • Kim, J. J., Lee, J., Shin, J., & He, M. (2022). How are high-tech assistive devices valued in an aging society? Exploring the use and non-use values of equipment that aid limb disability. Technology in Society, 70, 102013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102013

    RESULT
  • Khantan, M., Avery, M., Aung, P. T., Zarin, R. M., Hammelef, E., Shawki, N., Serruya, M. D., & Napoli, A. (2023). The NuroSleeve, a user-centered 3D printed hybrid orthosis for individuals with upper extremity impairment. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01228-2

    RESULT
  • Jinghong, C., & Hu, X. (2024). Mobile Phone Accessibility Solution for People with Upper Limb Dysfunction. Human Factors in Design, Engineering, and Computing, 159(159). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005653

    RESULT
  • Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139-183). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9

    RESULT
  • Hands., A. (2025). Active Hands: Gripping aids for disabled people. Active Hands. https://www.activehands.com/

    RESULT
  • Godeau, D., Fadel, M., & Descatha, A. (2022). Factors associated with limitations in daily life and at work in a population with shoulder pain. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 23(1), 777. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05638-6

    RESULT
  • Gerhardt JJ, Rondinelli RD. Goniometric techniques for range-of-motion assessment. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2001 Aug;12(3):507-27.

  • Fitzpatrick, A. P., Mohanned, M. I., Collins, P. K., & Gibson, I. (2017). Design of a patient specific, 3D printed arm cast. KnE Engineering, 135-142.

    RESULT
  • Equip2Adapt. (n.d.). Cell phone accessibility. Equip2Adapt. https://equip2adapt.com/blog/cell-phone-accessibility/ Fairman, A. D., Indradhirmaya, F. A., Osal, R. B., & Saptono, A. (2025). Iterative user-centered design of the mobile device assessment tool (MoDAT). Technologies, 13(8), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13080358 Fitzpatrick, A. P., Mohanned, M. I., Collins, P. K., & Gibson, I. (2017). Design of a patient specific, 3D printed arm cast. KnE Engineering, 135-142. Gerhardt, J. J., Rondinelli, R. D. J. P. m., & America, r. c. o. N. (2001). Goniometric techniques for range-of-motion assessment. 12(3), 507-528. Godeau, D., Fadel, M., & Descatha, A. (2022). Factors associated with limitations in daily life and at work in a population with shoulder pain. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 23(1), 777. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05638-6 Hands., A. (2025). Active Hands: Gripping aids for disabled people. Active Hands. https://www.activehands.com/ Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139-183). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 Hunzeker, M., & Ozelie, R. (2021). A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy Practice. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9(1), 1-12. iAccessibility. (n.d). Hawkeye Access. https://www.iaccessibility.com/apps/mobility/index.cgi/product?ID=288 Jang, H.-Y., Chung, D., Oh, E., & Hong, G.-R. S. (2025). Experiences of individuals with severe disabilities using assistive devices: A qualitative study. Disability and Health Journal, 101833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101833 Janson, R., Burkhart, K., Firchau, C., Hicks, K., Pittman, M., Yopps, M., Hatfield, S., & Garabrant, A. (2020). Three-dimensional printed assistive devices for addressing occupational performance issues of the hand: A case report. Journal of Hand Th

    RESULT
  • Dorrington, P., Wilkinson, C., Tasker, L., & Walters, A. (2016). User-centered design method for the design of assistive switch devices to improve user experience, accessibility, and independence. Journal of Usability Studies, 11(2).

    RESULT
  • Chan, N. H., & Ng, S. S. (2025). Contribution of Perceived Upper Limb Function to the Participation and Activity Levels Among Community-Dwelling People With Chronic Stroke. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.240122

    RESULT
  • Bonanno, M., Saracino, B., Ciancarelli, I., Panza, G., Manuli, A., Morone, G., & Calabrò, R. S. (2025). Assistive technologies for individuals with a disability from a neurological condition: A narrative review on the multimodal integration. Healthcare,

    RESULT
  • Batkuldinova, K., Abilgaziyev, A., Shehab, E., & Ali, M. H. (2021). The recent development of 3D printing in developing lower-leg exoskeleton: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 42, 1822-1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.191

    RESULT
  • Baronio G, Harran S, Signoroni A. A Critical Analysis of a Hand Orthosis Reverse Engineering and 3D Printing Process. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2016;2016:8347478. doi: 10.1155/2016/8347478. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

  • Alghadir, A. H., Gabr, S. A., Rizk, A. A., Alghadir, T., Alghadir, F., & Iqbal, A. (2025). Smartphone addiction and musculoskeletal associated disorders in university students: biomechanical measures and questionnaire survey analysis. European Journal of Medical Research, 30(1), 274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02413-w

    RESULT

Study Officials

  • Fen-Ling Kuo, Master

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Fen-Ling Kuo, Master

CONTACT

Chieh-Yu Pan, Master

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Week
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2026

First Posted

May 1, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations