Effect of Opioid-Free vs Opioid-Based Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain and Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Cleft Surgery
Comparison of Impact of Opioid and Non-Opioid Anesthesia on Pain and Agitation Levels in Children After Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery
2 other identifiers
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orofacial clefts are among the most common congenital malformations, affecting approximately 1 in 700-1500 live births worldwide. They are associated not only with aesthetic concerns but also with functional impairments in feeding, speech, hearing, and dentition, and may be accompanied by other systemic malformations, often requiring multiple surgical procedures and long-term multidisciplinary care. Although cognitive development is preserved, the psychosocial impact on both children and families can be significant. Anesthesia in children with clefts presents specific challenges. Airway management is often more difficult due to anatomical variations, particularly in syndromic patients and those under 1 year of age. Immature organ systems affect drug metabolism, requiring careful dose adjustment. Preoperative anxiety and stress responses are common and may contribute to complications such as laryngospasm and bronchospasm. In the postoperative period, emergence agitation (EA) and emergence delirium (ED) are frequent, with reported incidence up to 80%. These conditions are characterized by restlessness, inconsolability, and disorientation, and may result in self-injury or disruption of surgical repairs. Differentiating agitation from pain is challenging in young children due to limited communication abilities. Validated observational tools such as CHIPPS, PAEDS, and Cravero scales are used for routine clinical assessment of pain and EA/ED, although their subjective nature may limit accuracy. Therefore, evaluation of the perioperative serum cortisol, alpha-amylase, and neuropeptide Y levels will be used. These biomarkers reflect activation of the physiological stress response and indirectly indicate the presence and intensity of pain. Pain management requires a multimodal approach. While opioids remain standard, their use is associated with adverse effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and delayed recovery. Consequently, opioid-free (OF) strategies using different anesthetics, including ketamine and dexmedetomidine have gained attention. This prospective randomized clinical trial will compare opioid-based anesthesia with an opioid-free protocol in children undergoing cleft surgery. A total of 90 patients age of 3 months-7 years will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The opioid group will receive fentanyl, while the OF group will receive ketamine and dexmedetomidine; both groups will receive propofol, vecuronium, sevoflurane, and nitrous oxide. Primary outcomes are postoperative pain (CHIPPS) and emergence agitation (PAEDS, Cravero). Pain will be assessed at 5 min, 15 min, 1, 2, 12, and 24 h after extubation, whereas emergence agitation will be evaluated at 5 min, 15 min, 1 h, and 2 h post-extubation. While these scales are routinely used in clinical practice, their subjective nature necessitates additional objective assessment. Therefore, secondary outcomes include evaluation of perioperative stress markers (cortisol, alpha-amylase, neuropeptide Y) and adverse events (nausea, vomiting, pruritus, constipation, respiratory depression, altered consciousness) within 24 h. Procedures will be standardized, with morning surgeries to minimize circadian variations of the biomarkers, performed by the same team. Blood samples will be collected before and after intravenous induction. Postoperative analgesia will include paracetamol and NSAIDs, with fentanyl as rescue therapy. The study hypothesis is that opioid-free anesthesia will provide comparable or superior analgesia, reduce the incidence of emergence agitation, attenuate the stress response, and decrease opioid-related adverse effects, thereby improving overall perioperative safety and recovery in pediatric patients undergoing cleft surgery. The particular value of this study lies in the subgroup of children who will undergo at least two surgical procedures within the observation period. In these patients, each child will be exposed to both anesthetic protocols in separate procedures-once according to the randomly assigned regimen and the second time according to the alternative protocol. In this way, each patient serves as their own control, allowing for a more precise comparison of outcomes with a substantial reduction in inter-individual variability. This approach largely eliminates individual differences such as age, body weight, baseline hemodynamic status, individual sensitivity to anesthetics and analgesics, as well as variability in stress response and pain perception. Such a design enhances the internal validity of the study and enables a more reliable interpretation of the results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
April 29, 2026
February 1, 2026
2.3 years
April 22, 2026
April 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative pain intensity assessed by the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS)
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS), a validated observational tool for pain assessment in infants and young children. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain. Pain assessments will be performed at predefined time points: 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after extubation. A CHIPPS score ≥4 is considered indicative of insufficient analgesia.
Scores will be estimated 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after extubation.
Emergence agitation assessed by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS)
Emergence agitation will be assessed using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS), a validated observational tool based on behavioral observation and consisting of five items: eye contact, purposeful actions, awareness of surroundings, restlessness, and inconsolability. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate severe emergence delirium. Values ≥10 are commonly considered clinically significant.
Scores will be estimated 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours after extubation.
Emergence agitation assessed by the Cravero Agitation Scale
Emergence agitation will also be assessed using the Cravero scale, an observational scale used for evaluation of postoperative agitation in pediatric patients. Agitation will be recorded at extubation and during the early postoperative recovery period at predefined intervals of 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours after extubation. Higher scores indicate more pronounced agitation.
Scores will be estimated 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours after extubation.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Perioperative stress response assessed by serum cortisol levels
Before intravenous anesthesia induction and before emergence from anesthesia
Perioperative stress response assessed by serum alpha-amylase levels
Before intravenous anesthesia induction and before emergence from anesthesia
Perioperative stress response assessed by serum neuropeptide Y levels
Before intravenous anesthesia induction and before emergence from anesthesia
Incidence of postoperative adverse events
From anesthesia emergence until 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Opioid-Free Anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive opioid-free anesthesia using a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine, along with standard anesthetic agents (propofol, sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and muscle relaxant) during cleft lip and/or palate surgery.
Opioid-Based Anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive opioid-based anesthesia using fentanyl in combination with standard anesthetic agents (propofol, sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and muscle relaxant) during cleft lip and/or palate surgery.
Interventions
Ketamine administered as part of an opioid-free anesthesia protocol during pediatric cleft surgery.
Dexmedetomidine administered as part of an opioid-free anesthesia protocol during pediatric cleft surgery.
Fentanyl administered as part of an opioid-based anesthesia protocol during pediatric cleft surgery.
Propofol used for induction and/or maintenance of general anesthesia.
Sevoflurane used for maintenance of general anesthesia
Nitrous oxide used as an adjunct to general anesthesia.
Neuromuscular blocking agent used to facilitate tracheal intubation and surgical conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status I-II
- Body weight \>5 kg
- Age ≥3 months for cleft lip repair and ≥9 months for cleft palate repair
- Hemoglobin \>100 g/L
You may not qualify if:
- ASA physical status III-IV
- Body weight \<5 kg
- Age \<3 months for cleft lip repair or \<9 months for cleft palate repair
- Hemoglobin \<100 g/L
- Acute illness
- Respiratory infection or vaccination within 2 weeks prior to surgery
- Requirement for perioperative intensive care
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Iva Smiljanićlead
- University of Zagrebcollaborator
- University Hospital Dubravacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Dubrava
Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
Related Publications (24)
Marwa M. Advantages of ketamine as a perioperative analgesic. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol. 2022;28(1). doi:10.35975/apic.v28i1.2239
BACKGROUNDZielinski J, Morawska-Kochman M, Zatonski T. Pain assessment and management in children in the postoperative period: A review of the most commonly used postoperative pain assessment tools, new diagnostic methods and the latest guidelines for postoperative pain therapy in children. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Mar;29(3):365-374. doi: 10.17219/acem/112600.
PMID: 32129952BACKGROUNDSikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Anesthesiology. 2004 May;100(5):1138-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00015.
PMID: 15114210BACKGROUNDReduque L, Verghese S. Paediatric emergence delirium Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, 13, 39-41
BACKGROUNDRao Y, Zeng R, Jiang X, Li J, Wang X. The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Emergence Agitation or Delirium in Children After Anesthesia-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. Front Pediatr. 2020 Jul 14;8:329. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00329. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32766178BACKGROUNDSurana P, Parikh DA, Patkar GA, Tendolkar BA. A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine during cleft palate surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Dec;70(6):633-641. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.633. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
PMID: 29225747BACKGROUNDSadeghi A, Sajad Razavi S, Eghbali A, Alireza Mahdavi S, Kimia F, Panah A. The Comparison of the Efficacy of Early versus Late Administration of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Oral Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2022 Jan;47(1):25-32. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.84509.1471.
PMID: 35017774BACKGROUNDLiu D, Pan L, Gao Y, Liu J, Li F, Li X, Quan J, Huang C, Lian C. Efficaciousness of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing cleft lip and palate repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 16;11(8):e046798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046798.
PMID: 34400450BACKGROUNDKayyal TA, Wolfswinkel EM, Weathers WM, Capehart SJ, Monson LA, Buchanan EP, Glover CD. Treatment effects of dexmedetomidine and ketamine on postoperative analgesia after cleft palate repair. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014 Jun;7(2):131-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371446. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
PMID: 25045418BACKGROUNDOlejnik L, Lima JP, Sadeghirad B, Busse JW, Florez ID, Ali S, Bunker J, Jomaa D, Bleik A, Eltorki M. Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain in Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 1;179(4):407-417. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5920.
PMID: 39899301BACKGROUNDMartin LD, Franz AM, Rampersad SE, Ojo B, Low DK, Martin LD, Hunyady AI, Flack SH, Geiduschek JM. Outcomes for 41 260 pediatric surgical patients with opioid-free anesthesia: One center's experience. Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Sep;33(9):699-709. doi: 10.1111/pan.14705. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
PMID: 37300350BACKGROUNDMorzycki A, Nickel K, Newton D, Ng MC, Guilfoyle R. In search of the optimal pain management strategy for children undergoing cleft lip and palate repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Nov;75(11):4221-4232. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.104. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
PMID: 36171173BACKGROUNDRossell-Perry P, Romero-Narvaez C, Rojas-Sandoval R, Gomez-Henao P, Delgado-Jimenez MP, Marca-Ticona R. Is the Use of Opioids Safe after Primary Cleft Palate Repair? A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):e3355. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003355. eCollection 2021 Jan.
PMID: 33564585BACKGROUNDSuleiman NN, Luedi MM, Joshi G, Dewinter G, Wu CL, Sauter AR; PROSPECT Working Group. Perioperative pain management for cleft palate surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Sep 2;49(9):635-641. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105024.
PMID: 38124208BACKGROUNDVittinghoff M, Lonnqvist PA, Mossetti V, Heschl S, Simic D, Colovic V, Hozle M, Zielinska M, Maria BJ, Oppitz F, Butkovic D, Morton NS. Postoperative Pain Management in children: guidance from the Pain Committee of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative) Part II. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024 Dec;43(6):101427. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101427. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
PMID: 39299468BACKGROUNDVittinghoff M, Lonnqvist PA, Mossetti V, Heschl S, Simic D, Colovic V, Dmytriiev D, Holzle M, Zielinska M, Kubica-Cielinska A, Lorraine-Lichtenstein E, Budic I, Karisik M, Maria BJ, Smedile F, Morton NS. Postoperative pain management in children: Guidance from the pain committee of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative). Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Jun;28(6):493-506. doi: 10.1111/pan.13373. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
PMID: 29635764BACKGROUNDPeng W, Zhang T. Dexmedetomidine decreases the emergence agitation in infant patients undergoing cleft palate repair surgery after general anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 13;15:145. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0124-7.
PMID: 26464000BACKGROUNDAniley HT, Mekuria ST, Kebede MA, Gebreanania AH, Muleta MB, Aniley TT. Magnitude of emergence agitation, its interventions and associated factors among paediatric surgical patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 13;24(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02623-5.
PMID: 39003466BACKGROUNDFrković SH. Cleft lip and cleft palate from the genetic aspect. Paediatria Croatica. 2015; 59(2):98-98. DOI: 10.13112/PC.2015.15
BACKGROUNDDisma N, Virag K, Riva T, Kaufmann J, Engelhardt T, Habre W; NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network; AUSTRIA (Maria Vittinghoff); BELGIUM (Francis Veyckemans); CROATIA (Sandra Kralik); CZECH REPUBLIC (Jiri Zurek); DENMARK (Tom Hansen); ESTONIA (Reet Kikas); FINLAND (Tuula Manner); FRANCE (Christophe Dadure, Anne Lafargue); GERMANY (Karin Becke, Claudia Hoehne); GREECE (Anna Malisiova); HUNGARY (Andrea Szekely); IRELAND (Brendan O'Hare); ITALY (Nicola Disma); LATVIA (Zane Straume); LITHUANIA (Laura Lukosiene); LUXEMBOURG (Bernd Schmitz); MALTA (Francis Borg); NETHERLANDS (Jurgen de Graaff); NORWAY (Wenche B Boerke); POLAND (Marzena Zielinska); PORTUGAL (Maria Domingas Patuleia); ROMANIA (Radu Tabacaru); SERBIA (Dusica Simic); SLOVAKIA (Miloslav Hanula); SLOVENIA (Jelena Berger); SPAIN (Ignacio Galvez Escalera); SWEDEN (Albert Castellheim); SWITZERLAND (Walid Habre); TURKEY (Dilek Ozcengiz - Zehra Hatipoglu); UKRAINE (Dmytro Dmytriiev); UNITED KINGDOM (Thomas Engelhardt, Suellen Walker); Management Team. Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;126(6):1173-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Apr 1. Erratum In: Br J Anaesth. 2021 Aug;127(2):326. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015.
PMID: 33812665BACKGROUNDHeinrich S, Birkholz T, Ihmsen H, Irouschek A, Ackermann A, Schmidt J. Incidence and predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in 11,219 pediatric anesthesia procedures. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Aug;22(8):729-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03813.x. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
PMID: 22340664BACKGROUNDArteau-Gauthier I, Leclerc JE, Godbout A. Can we predict a difficult intubation in cleft lip/palate patients? J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Oct;40(5):413-9.
PMID: 22420397BACKGROUNDLeslie EJ, Marazita ML. Genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013 Nov;163C(4):246-58. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31381. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
PMID: 24124047BACKGROUNDPutri FA, Pattamatta M, Anita SES, Maulina T. The Global Occurrences of Cleft Lip and Palate in Pediatric Patients and Their Association with Demographic Factors: A Narrative Review. Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 8;11(3):322. doi: 10.3390/children11030322.
PMID: 38539356BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Iva Smiljanic, MD, MSc
University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, MSc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2026
First Posted
April 29, 2026
Study Start
May 16, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This is a single-investigator study, and there are no plans to share individual participant data (IPD).