NCT07557576

Brief Summary

Orofacial clefts are among the most common congenital malformations, affecting approximately 1 in 700-1500 live births worldwide. They are associated not only with aesthetic concerns but also with functional impairments in feeding, speech, hearing, and dentition, and may be accompanied by other systemic malformations, often requiring multiple surgical procedures and long-term multidisciplinary care. Although cognitive development is preserved, the psychosocial impact on both children and families can be significant. Anesthesia in children with clefts presents specific challenges. Airway management is often more difficult due to anatomical variations, particularly in syndromic patients and those under 1 year of age. Immature organ systems affect drug metabolism, requiring careful dose adjustment. Preoperative anxiety and stress responses are common and may contribute to complications such as laryngospasm and bronchospasm. In the postoperative period, emergence agitation (EA) and emergence delirium (ED) are frequent, with reported incidence up to 80%. These conditions are characterized by restlessness, inconsolability, and disorientation, and may result in self-injury or disruption of surgical repairs. Differentiating agitation from pain is challenging in young children due to limited communication abilities. Validated observational tools such as CHIPPS, PAEDS, and Cravero scales are used for routine clinical assessment of pain and EA/ED, although their subjective nature may limit accuracy. Therefore, evaluation of the perioperative serum cortisol, alpha-amylase, and neuropeptide Y levels will be used. These biomarkers reflect activation of the physiological stress response and indirectly indicate the presence and intensity of pain. Pain management requires a multimodal approach. While opioids remain standard, their use is associated with adverse effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, and delayed recovery. Consequently, opioid-free (OF) strategies using different anesthetics, including ketamine and dexmedetomidine have gained attention. This prospective randomized clinical trial will compare opioid-based anesthesia with an opioid-free protocol in children undergoing cleft surgery. A total of 90 patients age of 3 months-7 years will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The opioid group will receive fentanyl, while the OF group will receive ketamine and dexmedetomidine; both groups will receive propofol, vecuronium, sevoflurane, and nitrous oxide. Primary outcomes are postoperative pain (CHIPPS) and emergence agitation (PAEDS, Cravero). Pain will be assessed at 5 min, 15 min, 1, 2, 12, and 24 h after extubation, whereas emergence agitation will be evaluated at 5 min, 15 min, 1 h, and 2 h post-extubation. While these scales are routinely used in clinical practice, their subjective nature necessitates additional objective assessment. Therefore, secondary outcomes include evaluation of perioperative stress markers (cortisol, alpha-amylase, neuropeptide Y) and adverse events (nausea, vomiting, pruritus, constipation, respiratory depression, altered consciousness) within 24 h. Procedures will be standardized, with morning surgeries to minimize circadian variations of the biomarkers, performed by the same team. Blood samples will be collected before and after intravenous induction. Postoperative analgesia will include paracetamol and NSAIDs, with fentanyl as rescue therapy. The study hypothesis is that opioid-free anesthesia will provide comparable or superior analgesia, reduce the incidence of emergence agitation, attenuate the stress response, and decrease opioid-related adverse effects, thereby improving overall perioperative safety and recovery in pediatric patients undergoing cleft surgery. The particular value of this study lies in the subgroup of children who will undergo at least two surgical procedures within the observation period. In these patients, each child will be exposed to both anesthetic protocols in separate procedures-once according to the randomly assigned regimen and the second time according to the alternative protocol. In this way, each patient serves as their own control, allowing for a more precise comparison of outcomes with a substantial reduction in inter-individual variability. This approach largely eliminates individual differences such as age, body weight, baseline hemodynamic status, individual sensitivity to anesthetics and analgesics, as well as variability in stress response and pain perception. Such a design enhances the internal validity of the study and enables a more reliable interpretation of the results.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started May 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress83%
May 2024Sep 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 16, 2024

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 29, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 30, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2026

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Anesthesia, orofacial clefts, pain control, emergence agitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Postoperative pain intensity assessed by the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS)

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS), a validated observational tool for pain assessment in infants and young children. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain. Pain assessments will be performed at predefined time points: 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after extubation. A CHIPPS score ≥4 is considered indicative of insufficient analgesia.

    Scores will be estimated 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after extubation.

  • Emergence agitation assessed by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS)

    Emergence agitation will be assessed using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAEDS), a validated observational tool based on behavioral observation and consisting of five items: eye contact, purposeful actions, awareness of surroundings, restlessness, and inconsolability. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate severe emergence delirium. Values ≥10 are commonly considered clinically significant.

    Scores will be estimated 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours after extubation.

  • Emergence agitation assessed by the Cravero Agitation Scale

    Emergence agitation will also be assessed using the Cravero scale, an observational scale used for evaluation of postoperative agitation in pediatric patients. Agitation will be recorded at extubation and during the early postoperative recovery period at predefined intervals of 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours after extubation. Higher scores indicate more pronounced agitation.

    Scores will be estimated 5 minutes ,15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours after extubation.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Perioperative stress response assessed by serum cortisol levels

    Before intravenous anesthesia induction and before emergence from anesthesia

  • Perioperative stress response assessed by serum alpha-amylase levels

    Before intravenous anesthesia induction and before emergence from anesthesia

  • Perioperative stress response assessed by serum neuropeptide Y levels

    Before intravenous anesthesia induction and before emergence from anesthesia

  • Incidence of postoperative adverse events

    From anesthesia emergence until 24 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Opioid-Free Anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive opioid-free anesthesia using a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine, along with standard anesthetic agents (propofol, sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and muscle relaxant) during cleft lip and/or palate surgery.

Drug: Ketamine (1 mg/kg)Drug: Dexmedetomidine (1-0,8-0,6-0,4 mcg/kg/h)Drug: Propofol (IV) 3-4 mg/kgDrug: Sevoflurane (Volatile Anesthetic)Drug: Nitrous Oxide/OxygenDrug: Vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg)

Opioid-Based Anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants receive opioid-based anesthesia using fentanyl in combination with standard anesthetic agents (propofol, sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and muscle relaxant) during cleft lip and/or palate surgery.

Drug: Fentanyl 5 mcg/kgDrug: Propofol (IV) 3-4 mg/kgDrug: Sevoflurane (Volatile Anesthetic)Drug: Nitrous Oxide/OxygenDrug: Vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg)

Interventions

Ketamine administered as part of an opioid-free anesthesia protocol during pediatric cleft surgery.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia

Dexmedetomidine administered as part of an opioid-free anesthesia protocol during pediatric cleft surgery.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia

Fentanyl administered as part of an opioid-based anesthesia protocol during pediatric cleft surgery.

Opioid-Based Anesthesia

Propofol used for induction and/or maintenance of general anesthesia.

Opioid-Based AnesthesiaOpioid-Free Anesthesia

Sevoflurane used for maintenance of general anesthesia

Opioid-Based AnesthesiaOpioid-Free Anesthesia

Nitrous oxide used as an adjunct to general anesthesia.

Opioid-Based AnesthesiaOpioid-Free Anesthesia

Neuromuscular blocking agent used to facilitate tracheal intubation and surgical conditions.

Opioid-Based AnesthesiaOpioid-Free Anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Months - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA physical status I-II
  • Body weight \>5 kg
  • Age ≥3 months for cleft lip repair and ≥9 months for cleft palate repair
  • Hemoglobin \>100 g/L

You may not qualify if:

  • ASA physical status III-IV
  • Body weight \<5 kg
  • Age \<3 months for cleft lip repair or \<9 months for cleft palate repair
  • Hemoglobin \<100 g/L
  • Acute illness
  • Respiratory infection or vaccination within 2 weeks prior to surgery
  • Requirement for perioperative intensive care

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Dubrava

Zagreb, 10000, Croatia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (24)

  • Marwa M. Advantages of ketamine as a perioperative analgesic. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol. 2022;28(1). doi:10.35975/apic.v28i1.2239

    BACKGROUND
  • Zielinski J, Morawska-Kochman M, Zatonski T. Pain assessment and management in children in the postoperative period: A review of the most commonly used postoperative pain assessment tools, new diagnostic methods and the latest guidelines for postoperative pain therapy in children. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Mar;29(3):365-374. doi: 10.17219/acem/112600.

    PMID: 32129952BACKGROUND
  • Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Anesthesiology. 2004 May;100(5):1138-45. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00015.

    PMID: 15114210BACKGROUND
  • Reduque L, Verghese S. Paediatric emergence delirium Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, 13, 39-41

    BACKGROUND
  • Rao Y, Zeng R, Jiang X, Li J, Wang X. The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Emergence Agitation or Delirium in Children After Anesthesia-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. Front Pediatr. 2020 Jul 14;8:329. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00329. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32766178BACKGROUND
  • Surana P, Parikh DA, Patkar GA, Tendolkar BA. A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine during cleft palate surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Dec;70(6):633-641. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.633. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

    PMID: 29225747BACKGROUND
  • Sadeghi A, Sajad Razavi S, Eghbali A, Alireza Mahdavi S, Kimia F, Panah A. The Comparison of the Efficacy of Early versus Late Administration of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Oral Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2022 Jan;47(1):25-32. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.84509.1471.

    PMID: 35017774BACKGROUND
  • Liu D, Pan L, Gao Y, Liu J, Li F, Li X, Quan J, Huang C, Lian C. Efficaciousness of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing cleft lip and palate repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 16;11(8):e046798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046798.

    PMID: 34400450BACKGROUND
  • Kayyal TA, Wolfswinkel EM, Weathers WM, Capehart SJ, Monson LA, Buchanan EP, Glover CD. Treatment effects of dexmedetomidine and ketamine on postoperative analgesia after cleft palate repair. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014 Jun;7(2):131-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371446. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

    PMID: 25045418BACKGROUND
  • Olejnik L, Lima JP, Sadeghirad B, Busse JW, Florez ID, Ali S, Bunker J, Jomaa D, Bleik A, Eltorki M. Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain in Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 1;179(4):407-417. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5920.

    PMID: 39899301BACKGROUND
  • Martin LD, Franz AM, Rampersad SE, Ojo B, Low DK, Martin LD, Hunyady AI, Flack SH, Geiduschek JM. Outcomes for 41 260 pediatric surgical patients with opioid-free anesthesia: One center's experience. Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Sep;33(9):699-709. doi: 10.1111/pan.14705. Epub 2023 Jun 10.

    PMID: 37300350BACKGROUND
  • Morzycki A, Nickel K, Newton D, Ng MC, Guilfoyle R. In search of the optimal pain management strategy for children undergoing cleft lip and palate repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Nov;75(11):4221-4232. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.104. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

    PMID: 36171173BACKGROUND
  • Rossell-Perry P, Romero-Narvaez C, Rojas-Sandoval R, Gomez-Henao P, Delgado-Jimenez MP, Marca-Ticona R. Is the Use of Opioids Safe after Primary Cleft Palate Repair? A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):e3355. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003355. eCollection 2021 Jan.

    PMID: 33564585BACKGROUND
  • Suleiman NN, Luedi MM, Joshi G, Dewinter G, Wu CL, Sauter AR; PROSPECT Working Group. Perioperative pain management for cleft palate surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Sep 2;49(9):635-641. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105024.

    PMID: 38124208BACKGROUND
  • Vittinghoff M, Lonnqvist PA, Mossetti V, Heschl S, Simic D, Colovic V, Hozle M, Zielinska M, Maria BJ, Oppitz F, Butkovic D, Morton NS. Postoperative Pain Management in children: guidance from the Pain Committee of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative) Part II. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024 Dec;43(6):101427. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101427. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

    PMID: 39299468BACKGROUND
  • Vittinghoff M, Lonnqvist PA, Mossetti V, Heschl S, Simic D, Colovic V, Dmytriiev D, Holzle M, Zielinska M, Kubica-Cielinska A, Lorraine-Lichtenstein E, Budic I, Karisik M, Maria BJ, Smedile F, Morton NS. Postoperative pain management in children: Guidance from the pain committee of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative). Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Jun;28(6):493-506. doi: 10.1111/pan.13373. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

    PMID: 29635764BACKGROUND
  • Peng W, Zhang T. Dexmedetomidine decreases the emergence agitation in infant patients undergoing cleft palate repair surgery after general anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 13;15:145. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0124-7.

    PMID: 26464000BACKGROUND
  • Aniley HT, Mekuria ST, Kebede MA, Gebreanania AH, Muleta MB, Aniley TT. Magnitude of emergence agitation, its interventions and associated factors among paediatric surgical patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 13;24(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02623-5.

    PMID: 39003466BACKGROUND
  • Frković SH. Cleft lip and cleft palate from the genetic aspect. Paediatria Croatica. 2015; 59(2):98-98. DOI: 10.13112/PC.2015.15

    BACKGROUND
  • Disma N, Virag K, Riva T, Kaufmann J, Engelhardt T, Habre W; NECTARINE Group of the European Society of Anaesthesiology Clinical Trial Network; AUSTRIA (Maria Vittinghoff); BELGIUM (Francis Veyckemans); CROATIA (Sandra Kralik); CZECH REPUBLIC (Jiri Zurek); DENMARK (Tom Hansen); ESTONIA (Reet Kikas); FINLAND (Tuula Manner); FRANCE (Christophe Dadure, Anne Lafargue); GERMANY (Karin Becke, Claudia Hoehne); GREECE (Anna Malisiova); HUNGARY (Andrea Szekely); IRELAND (Brendan O'Hare); ITALY (Nicola Disma); LATVIA (Zane Straume); LITHUANIA (Laura Lukosiene); LUXEMBOURG (Bernd Schmitz); MALTA (Francis Borg); NETHERLANDS (Jurgen de Graaff); NORWAY (Wenche B Boerke); POLAND (Marzena Zielinska); PORTUGAL (Maria Domingas Patuleia); ROMANIA (Radu Tabacaru); SERBIA (Dusica Simic); SLOVAKIA (Miloslav Hanula); SLOVENIA (Jelena Berger); SPAIN (Ignacio Galvez Escalera); SWEDEN (Albert Castellheim); SWITZERLAND (Walid Habre); TURKEY (Dilek Ozcengiz - Zehra Hatipoglu); UKRAINE (Dmytro Dmytriiev); UNITED KINGDOM (Thomas Engelhardt, Suellen Walker); Management Team. Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;126(6):1173-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Apr 1. Erratum In: Br J Anaesth. 2021 Aug;127(2):326. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.015.

    PMID: 33812665BACKGROUND
  • Heinrich S, Birkholz T, Ihmsen H, Irouschek A, Ackermann A, Schmidt J. Incidence and predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in 11,219 pediatric anesthesia procedures. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Aug;22(8):729-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03813.x. Epub 2012 Feb 20.

    PMID: 22340664BACKGROUND
  • Arteau-Gauthier I, Leclerc JE, Godbout A. Can we predict a difficult intubation in cleft lip/palate patients? J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Oct;40(5):413-9.

    PMID: 22420397BACKGROUND
  • Leslie EJ, Marazita ML. Genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013 Nov;163C(4):246-58. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31381. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

    PMID: 24124047BACKGROUND
  • Putri FA, Pattamatta M, Anita SES, Maulina T. The Global Occurrences of Cleft Lip and Palate in Pediatric Patients and Their Association with Demographic Factors: A Narrative Review. Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 8;11(3):322. doi: 10.3390/children11030322.

    PMID: 38539356BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Emergence DeliriumAgnosia

Interventions

KetamineDexmedetomidineFentanylPropofolSevofluraneNitrous OxideOxygenVecuronium Bromide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DeliriumConfusionNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersPerceptual Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPiperidinesPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticMethyl EthersEthersHydrocarbons, FluorinatedHydrocarbons, HalogenatedNitrogen OxidesGasesInorganic ChemicalsNitrogen CompoundsOxidesOxygen CompoundsChalcogensElementsAndrostanolsAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Iva Smiljanic, MD, MSc

    University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Iva SMILJANIĆ, MD, MSc

CONTACT

Predrag Knežević, MD, Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, MSc

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2026

First Posted

April 29, 2026

Study Start

May 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This is a single-investigator study, and there are no plans to share individual participant data (IPD).

Locations