Comparative Effectiveness of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises With Idiopathic Scoliosis
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises (PSSE-Schroth) compared with General Exercises in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis over a 12-month intervention period. Primary outcomes include Cobb angle progression and brace prescription rate. Secondary outcomes include trunk rotation, quality of life, self-image, and body symmetry.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2026
CompletedApril 27, 2026
April 1, 2024
7 months
April 20, 2026
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Cobb Angle
Cobb angle will be measured on standing anteroposterior spinal radiographs using the standard Cobb method. The angle is defined as the intersection of lines drawn parallel to the superior endplate of the upper-end vertebra and the inferior endplate of the lower-end vertebra of the primary curve. Measurements will be performed at baseline and after the intervention period, and the change in Cobb angle (in degrees) will be calculated. Lower values indicate an improvement in spinal curvature.
Baseline to 12 Months
Brace Prescription Rate
The proportion of participants requiring orthotic bracing during the study period will be recorded. Brace prescription will be determined by a specialist according to established clinical criteria (e.g., curve magnitude, skeletal maturity, and risk of progression). The rate will be expressed as the percentage of participants prescribed a brace in each group during the follow-up period.
12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
SRS-22 Questionnaire Score
Baseline to 12 Months
TAPS Score
Baseline to 12 Months
TRACE Score
Baseline to 12 Months
Study Arms (2)
PSSE-Schroth Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants performed individualized PSSE-Schroth exercises based on curve pattern, including corrective breathing, postural correction, and ADL training.
General Exercise Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants performed general strengthening and stretching exercises without scoliosis-specific correction.
Interventions
Participants performed individualized PSSE-Schroth exercises based on curve pattern, including corrective breathing, postural correction, and ADL training
Participants performed general strengthening and stretching exercises without scoliosis-specific correction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
- Cobb angle 10°-25°
- Risser sign 0-3 ATR \>5°
- Less than 1 year post-menarche (for females)
You may not qualify if:
- Previous brace treatment \* Non-idiopathic scoliosis
- Previous scoliosis surgery
- Neuromuscular or congenital scoliosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Gaziantep, Şahinbey, 27000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Zhang Y, Chai T, Weng H, Liu Y. Pelvic rotation correction combined with Schroth exercises for pelvic and spinal deformities in mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2024 Jul 30;19(7):e0307955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307955. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39078854RESULTMohamed N, Acharya V, Schreiber S, Parent EC, Westover L. Effect of adding Schroth physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises to standard care in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis on posture assessed using surface topography: A secondary analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). PLoS One. 2024 Apr 30;19(4):e0302577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302577. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38687741RESULTKuru T, Yeldan I, Dereli EE, Ozdincler AR, Dikici F, Colak I. The efficacy of three-dimensional Schroth exercises in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Feb;30(2):181-90. doi: 10.1177/0269215515575745. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
PMID: 25780260RESULTNegrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, de Mauroy JC, Diers H, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Lebel A, Marti C, Maruyama T, O'Brien J, Price N, Parent E, Rigo M, Romano M, Stikeleather L, Wynne J, Zaina F. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018 Jan 10;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29435499RESULTWeinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1512-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307337. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
PMID: 24047455RESULTBago J, Sanchez-Raya J, Perez-Grueso FJ, Climent JM. The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): a new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2010 Mar 25;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-6.
PMID: 20338048RESULTAsher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):63-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015.
PMID: 12544958RESULTLangensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, Fricke O, Franklin J, Schonau E, Eysel P. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2360-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2693-9. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
PMID: 23443679RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors and statisticians were blinded to group allocation. Participants and treating therapists were not blinded due to the nature of exercise interventions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2026
First Posted
April 27, 2026
Study Start
April 18, 2024
Primary Completion
November 18, 2024
Study Completion
November 18, 2025
Last Updated
April 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share