Postural Motor Activation Deficits After mTBI; Translating Laboratory Findings to Clinical Care
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This work will address an important gap in physical therapy rehabilitation after concussion. Physical therapy usually focuses on how the brain processes sensory information such as inner ear and vision for balance rehabilitation, but our recent research shows that people with imbalance more often have a problem with how they can respond to imbalance (i.e., motor activation). While there are complex laboratory tools to test motor activation for balance, these tests are not practical for the clinic. The goal of this study is to create both an exercise intervention focused on motor activation after concussion and simple, but objective and instrumented (wearable sensors), clinical measures of motor activation. Objectives: This research study has three aims. 1) The investigators and study team will develop an exercise program to improve the problems with how one's body responds to imbalance (i.e., improve motor activation) after a concussion. The study team will use a Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach by collaborating with a team of people with a broad range of experience related to concussion. The study team will form a Community Advisory Board (CAB) that will include patients who have had a concussion, healthcare professionals with expertise in concussion, and healthcare administrators. The CAB will contain people working in the military and civilians. 2) The investigators will compare our new motor-focused physical therapy intervention to the standard sensory focused balance intervention. The goal is to determine which intervention program is more effective in treating balance problems after a concussion. The investigators hypothesize that the motor-focused program will help patients more compared to the sensory program. 3) The investigators and study team will create and test several balance tests that can be used in the clinical without expensive research equipment to our standard research-based motor activation tests. This aim will allow the study team to determine if the clinical tests perform as well as the research-grade tests. To make the test useful to clinicians, the study team will use simpler technology like smart-phone applications, wearable sensors, and virtual reality goggles that are both affordable and practical for healthcare providers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2029
April 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
3.2 years
April 10, 2026
April 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Instrumented, Modified Push & Release Test (I-mP&R) - Time to Stability
The Instrumented, Modified Push \& Release (I-mP\&R) test quantifies reactive balance and motor activation by measuring the time required to regain stability following a controlled loss of balance. Participants are leaned just beyond their limit of stability, instructed to close their eyes, and then released unexpectedly. Wearable inertial sensors placed on the lumbar spine and bilateral feet are used to determine the instant of release and the first instant of stability, defined as lumbar acceleration magnitude less than 1.07 times gravity and angular velocity magnitude less than 14 degrees per second. The test is performed in four directions (forward, backward, left, right), and the median Time to Stability across all directions is retained as the primary outcome.
Weeks 0 and 7 of study
Secondary Outcomes (30)
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Week 7 only
Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)
Weeks 0 and 7
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI)
Weeks 0 and 7
Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI)
Weeks 0 and 7
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)
Weeks 0 and 7
- +25 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Participants with motor physical therapy for mTBI
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm of the study will receive physical therapy focused on reactive and dynamic balance exercises to improve motor activation for stability.
Standard of care physical therapy treatment for mTBI
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm of the study will receive physical therapy in accordance with current clinical practice guidelines for mTBI treatment.
Interventions
This arm of the study will complete approximately 12 rehabilitation sessions involving the the current clinical practice guidelines for mTBI treatment including exercises for aerobic tolerance, neck pain, balance, and movement.
The motor activation program will complete approximately 12 rehabilitation sessions involving a novel physical therapy program with exercises targeted to improve dynamic and reactive balance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed mTBI (concussion)
- years of age
- More than 2 weeks from the date of the most recent mTBI
- Less than 6 months from the most recent mTBI
- Persisting symptoms from the mTBI
You may not qualify if:
- Injury, medical, or neurological illness that could explain balance issues
- Moderate to severe substance abuse in the past month
- Display behavior that would interfere with safety during data collection
- Significant pain during the study period (\> 7/10)
- Pregnancy
- Persistent use of medications that cause balance impairment during the study
- Active in physical therapy services for mTBI symptoms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oregon Health and Science Universitylead
- University of Utahcollaborator
- Fort Sam Houstoncollaborator
Study Sites (2)
OHSU Balance Disorders Laboratory
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
University of Utah Neuromechanics and Applied Locomotion Laboratory
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurie A King, PhD, PT, MCR
Oregon Health and Science University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Fino, PhD
University of Utah
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The person performing the statistical analysis will be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2026
First Posted
April 24, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2029
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04