NCT07539025

Brief Summary

Associative plasticity has been used to promote functional recovery from conditions affecting movement. Prior work from the Carmel laboratory has shown that paired associative stimulation protocols timed to converge in the cervical spinal cord induce significantly larger upper limb motor responses than if timed to converge in the motor cortex. The goal of this prospective experimental study in typically developing adults is to test the effects of pairing sub-threshold hand motor cortical and median nerve stimulation targeted to induce plasticity in the cervical spinal cord, rather than in the motor cortex. Based on preliminary data, the investigators are performing a confirmatory study to test the physiological and behavioral effects of the paired brain and peripheral nerve protocol, called the SCAP-Nerve protocol. This study will first be conducted in typically developing adults to confirm the cervical spinal cord as the ideal target and verify the present stimulation parameters are sufficient to promote induction of associative plasticity of sensorimotor connections for manual dexterity. The outcomes from this study could then be translated to efficacy studies in people with spinal cord injury and cerebral palsy to promote clinically meaningful improvements in dexterity.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
38mo left

Started Apr 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress3%
Apr 2026Jun 2029

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 13, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2026

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2028

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2029

Last Updated

April 30, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

cervical spinal cordpaired associative stimulationmotor evoked potentialspinal cord injurycerebral palsymanual dexteritycorticospinalsensory afferentSCAPspinal cord associative plasticity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Size of muscle response to brain stimulation after SCAP (percentage)

    Size of muscle response will be measured in response to brain stimulation. This value will be normalized to the equivalent measure taken before the SCAP protocol.

    30 minutes after SCAP

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Size of muscle response to nerve stimulation during combined brain and nerve stimulation after SCAP (percentage)

    Immediately after intervention, up to 1 minute

  • Size of muscle response to nerve stimulation during combined brain and nerve stimulation (percentage)

    Immediately after intervention, up to 1 minute

  • Size of muscle response to nerve stimulation during combined brain and nerve stimulation after SCAP (percentage)

    30 minutes after SCAP

  • Duration of effect of SCAP on subsequent responses to brain stimulation

    30 minutes after SCAP

  • Pinch force variability

    30 minutes after SCAP

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

SCAP

EXPERIMENTAL

With this session, participants will receive 90 trials of 0.1hz paired motor cortical stimulation and median nerve stimulation for 15 minutes at sub-threshold intensities, timed to converge in the cervical spinal cord simultaneously.

Other: SCAP

Cortical stimulation only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

With this session, participants will receive 90 trials of 0.1hz motor cortical stimulation for 15 minutes at sub-threshold intensities.

Device: MagPro X100

Median nerve stimulation only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

With this session, participants will receive 90 trials of 0.1hz median nerve stimulation for 15 minutes at sub-threshold intensities.

Device: Digitimer DS8R

Paired non-associative stimulation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

With this session, participants will receive 90 trials of 0.1hz paired motor cortical stimulation and median nerve stimulation for 15 minutes at sub-threshold intensities, timed to be 40 milliseconds apart in the cervical spinal cord.

Other: Paired non-associative stimulation

Interventions

SCAPOTHER

This utilizes pairing of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (rPNS) timed to converge in the cervical spinal cord.

SCAP

This stimulator will be use to provide repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

Cortical stimulation only

This stimulator will be used to provide repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation (rPNS).

Median nerve stimulation only

This utilizes pairing of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (rPNS) timed to arrive at a pairing interval of 40 msec.

Paired non-associative stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Willingness to participate in up to 4 sessions
  • Maintenance of caffeine and exercise levels at time of sessions
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • No known central or peripheral neurological disease or injury
  • No known musculoskeletal injury of the tested arm or hand

You may not qualify if:

  • Personal or family history of seizures
  • Use of medications that lower seizure threshold
  • History of implanted equipment including stimulators/pacemakers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

New York, New York, 10040, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Ling YT, Alam M, Zheng YP. Spinal Cord Injury: Lessons about Neuroplasticity from Paired Associative Stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2020 Jun;26(3):266-277. doi: 10.1177/1073858419895461. Epub 2019 Dec 31.

    PMID: 31889474BACKGROUND
  • Shulga A, Lioumis P, Zubareva A, Brandstack N, Kuusela L, Kirveskari E, Savolainen S, Ylinen A, Makela JP. Long-term paired associative stimulation can restore voluntary control over paralyzed muscles in incomplete chronic spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2016 Jul 14;2:16016. doi: 10.1038/scsandc.2016.16. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 28053760BACKGROUND
  • Delvendahl I, Jung NH, Kuhnke NG, Ziemann U, Mall V. Plasticity of motor threshold and motor-evoked potential amplitude--a model of intrinsic and synaptic plasticity in human motor cortex? Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):586-93. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

    PMID: 22445536BACKGROUND
  • Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, Benecke R, Classen J. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000 Mar;123 Pt 3:572-84. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.3.572.

    PMID: 10686179BACKGROUND
  • Murray LM, McIntosh JR, Goldsmith JA, Wu YK, Liu M, Sanford SP, Joiner EF, Mandigo C, Virk MS, Tyagi V, Carmel JB, Harel NY. Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Apr 27:2025.04.17.25326011. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.17.25326011.

    PMID: 40313296BACKGROUND
  • Murray LM, McIntosh JR, Goldsmith JA, Wu YK, Liu M, Sanford SP, Joiner EF, Mandigo C, Tyagi V, Virk MS, Carmel JB, Harel NY. Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 Dec;180:2111372. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2111372. Epub 2025 Oct 10.

    PMID: 41106070BACKGROUND
  • Pal A, Park H, Ramamurthy A, Asan AS, Bethea T, Johnkutty M, Carmel JB. Spinal cord associative plasticity improves forelimb sensorimotor function after cervical injury. Brain. 2022 Dec 19;145(12):4531-4544. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac235.

    PMID: 36063483BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord InjuriesCerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesBrain Damage, ChronicBrain Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Shaker Dukkipati, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Jason Carmel, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: All participants will undergo all arms of the study. They will first receive the SCAP protocol, which is the source of the primary investigation in this study. Then, they will receive the three comparator arms in randomized order over multiple sessions timed at least 24 hours apart to minimize carryover effects.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Weinberg Family Associate Professor of Neurology (in Orthopedic Surgery)

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2026

First Posted

April 20, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Last Updated

April 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations