Comparison of 3D Printed Metal Fixed Retainer Versus Conventional Fixed Bonded Retainer
2 other identifiers
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite the growing diversity of materials used for mandibular fixed retainers, the evidence base remains inconclusive. In particular, conflicting findings have been reported regarding the bond failure of titanium retainers across different evaluation periods, including immediate and 12-month outcomes. Additionally, the emergence of 3D metal-printed retainers has not yet been matched by sufficient clinical evidence, with current data being limited and lacking long-term validation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2026
CompletedApril 20, 2026
April 1, 2026
6 months
April 8, 2026
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
bond failure
Bond failure will be assessed clinically by detecting any detachment of the retainer from the tooth surface (number of debonded teeth).
immediate (within 24 hours after bonding) and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
chairside time
Periprocedural (during retainer bonding procedure on Day 1)
wire breakage
Every 3months for 12 months
plaque accumulation
Baseline (before retainer bonding) and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
posttreatment relapse
Baseline (before retainer bonding) and at 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Conventional fixed bonded retainer
ACTIVE COMPARATORBar 3d printed metal fixed retainer
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Participants will receive a custom-designed 3D-printed metal fixed retainer. The retainer is digitally designed using intraoral scans and fabricated using metal 3D printing technology to achieve a precise fit tailored to each patient.
Participants will receive a conventional fixed bonded lingual retainer (canine-to-canine) fabricated using multistranded stainless steel wire and bonded using standard clinical procedures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 13 years
- Complete permanent dentition up to second molars
- Completed Class I orthodontic treatment and requiring a mandibular fixed -bonded retainer
- No sex predilection.
You may not qualify if:
- Enamel defects that may compromise bonding (e.g., hypoplasia, fluorosis)
- Poor oral hygiene
- Active dental or periodontal pathology at the site of intervention
- Lingual restorations on mandibular anterior teeth
- Poor compliance or inability to attend follow-up visits
- Psychological or medical conditions that may interfere with study participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amany Ibrahimlead
Study Sites (1)
Amany Eltantawy
Giza, Cairo University, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2026
First Posted
April 20, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04