Time to Healing in Displaced Pediatric Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures Treated With Bioabsorbable Compared to Titanium Intramedullary Nails
FOREST
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study looks at children with forearm fractures that need surgery. The standard treatment uses titanium nails, which usually need to be removed in a second operation later. This study compares titanium nails with bioabsorbable nails, which gradually dissolve in the body and may help some children avoid another operation. The study will compare how quickly the fractures heal on X-ray, and also look at complications, recovery, function, and the family's experience. Children who need surgery will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatments so the comparison is fair. Hypothesis: The researchers expect that fractures treated with bioabsorbable nails will heal almost as quickly as fractures treated with titanium nails, while reducing the need for later implant removal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2031
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2031
April 22, 2026
April 1, 2026
5.1 years
April 11, 2026
April 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to fracture healing (weeks)
Time in weeks from surgery/randomization (Day 0) to the first postoperative radiographic assessment meeting the predefined healing threshold, assessed using the modified Radiographic Union Score (mRUS). Healing is defined as mRUS ≥11, with bridging callus present in at least 3 of 4 cortices and no cortex scored 1; for both-bone fractures, both bones must meet this threshold at the same assessment.
Postoperative radiographic assessments at 2, 4, and 6 weeks; if healing has not yet been established, additional radiographic assessments at 8 and 10 weeks, until the healing threshold is reached.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Range of motion
From surgery/randomization (Day 0) to scheduled follow-up assessments at 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks, and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years; if healing is delayed, also at 8 and 10 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Bioabsorbable intramedullary nail (BIN)
EXPERIMENTALChildren in this arm receive surgical fixation with a bioabsorbable intramedullary nail, followed by above-elbow cast immobilization for 4 weeks.
Titanium elastic nail (TEN)
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren in this arm receive surgical fixation with a titanium elastic intramedullary nail, followed by above-elbow cast immobilization for 2 weeks.
Interventions
Bioabsorbable intramedullary: Surgical fixation of the forearm fracture with a bioabsorbable intramedullary nail made of PLGA (poly\[lactic-co-glycolic acid\]), performed under general anesthesia, followed by above-elbow cast immobilization for 4 weeks. The implant is designed to retain strength during early healing and gradually absorb over time, so routine implant removal is not planned.
Titanium elastic intramedullary nail arm: surgical fixation of the forearm fracture with a titanium elastic intramedullary nail, performed under general anesthesia, followed by above-elbow cast immobilization for 2 weeks. In Denmark, later elective implant removal is standard practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of a traumatic diaphyseal forearm fracture of the radius, ulna, or both
- Operative fixation required
- Fractures must be complete (not unicortical or greenstick) AND displaced \>50% of bone width (after attempted closed reduction) AND/OR angulated \>10° in any plane (after attempted closed reduction)
- Informed consent obtained
You may not qualify if:
- Conditions where internal fixation is contraindicated (e.g. active or potential infection)
- Grossly open fractures (Gustilo Anderson grade \> 2)
- Fracture occurred more than 2 weeks prior
- Fractures that are well managed conservatively (undisplaced or minimally displaced)
- Previous ipsilateral forearm fracture (risk of closed medullary canal)
- Fractures unsuited for intramedullary nailing (e.g. multifragmentary, metaphyseal or epiphyseal)
- Concurrent ipsilateral wrist or elbow involvement (e.g. Monteggia or Galeazzi variants)
- Unable to participate in follow-up
- Existing bone pathology (e.g. tumor, osteogenesis imperfecta, degenerative disease)
- Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence in opinion of the PI the results of the present study
- Fractures suitable for closed reduction and casting (see 6.3.9)
- Indication for treatment 1 (BIN) only
- Indication for treatment 2 (ESIN) only
- Intraoperative decision to use implants other than the devices under investigation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev
København NV, 2400, Denmark
Related Publications (3)
Korhonen L, Perhomaa M, Kyro A, Pokka T, Serlo W, Merikanto J, Sinikumpu JJ. Intramedullary nailing of forearm shaft fractures by biodegradable compared with titanium nails: Results of a prospective randomized trial in children with at least two years of follow-up. Biomaterials. 2018 Dec;185:383-392. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
PMID: 30292588BACKGROUNDSimanovsky N, Tair MA, Simanovsky N, Porat S. Removal of flexible titanium nails in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):188-92. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000218534.51609.aa.
PMID: 16557132BACKGROUNDLascombes P, Haumont T, Journeau P. Use and abuse of flexible intramedullary nailing in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):827-34. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000235397.64783.d6.
PMID: 17065959BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Morten J Andersen, MD
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The following parties will be masked to treatment allocation: the participants, the parents, postoperative ward and outpatient clinic caregivers involved in routine care, clinicians performing follow-up assessments, radiograph reviewers, occupational/hand therapists performing functional assessments, and the statistician/data analyst. Participants and parents will remain masked until completion of the 6-month follow-up visit, unless earlier unblinding is required for patient safety. The operating surgeon and operating room staff cannot be masked because they must know which implant is used during surgery. A limited number of designated study personnel will remain unblinded for device logistics and, when relevant, planning of elective titanium nail removal.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Pediatric Trauma
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2026
First Posted
April 17, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2031
Last Updated
April 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
De-identified individual participant data collected during this study will not be made publicly available. Due to the small sample size, single-center design, and pediatric population, there is a relevant risk of participant re-identification even after de-identification. Aggregate study results will be reported in publications and presentations.