Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation at Jing-Well Points for Disorders of Consciousness
Wells-DoC II
Efficacy and Safety of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation at Hand Jing-Well Points in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness:A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Effective treatment options for disorders of consciousness (DoC) remain limited, and available interventions show heterogeneous efficacy. To date, limited evidences support the use of amantadine and transcranial direct current stimulation in this population. Bloodletting puncture (BP) at the hand twelve Jing-Well points (HTWPs) has been traditionally used in China as an empirical therapy for DoC; however, its efficacy has not been established by robust clinical evidence. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) provides a modern, noninvasive alternative for acupoint stimulation. The Wells-DoC trial, a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study with blinded endpoint assessment, provided preliminary evidence that TEAS applied at the hand twelve Jing-Well points was associated with a numerically higher proportion of consciousness improvement in patients with DoC, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. These findings support the need for further evaluation in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial. The Wells-DoC II trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TEAS at the twelve Jing-Well points of the hand in patients with DoC. The primary objective of the Wells-DoC II trial is to determine whether TEAS applied at the twelve Jing-Well points of the hand improves consciousness in adults with DoC. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving consciousness improvement after 14 consecutive days of treatment, compared between the TEAS group and the sham stimulation (placebo control) group. The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of TEAS versus sham stimulation on: (1) changes in Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores at 7 and 14 days; (2) change in ABCD model classification at day 14; and (3) functional outcomes measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) at 3 and 6 months after enrollment. A total of 160 patients will be recruited over a 28-month period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Apr 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
April 17, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.2 years
April 7, 2026
April 14, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of consciousness improvement after 14 consecutive days of treatment
The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of patients with consciousness improvement after 14 consecutive days of treatment, wherein improvements from unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS)/vegetative state (VS) to minimally conscious state (MCS) or emergence from minimally conscious state (EMCS), from MCS minus (MCS-) to MCS plus (MCS+) or EMCS, or from MCS+ to EMCS signify a consciousness improvement. Diagnoses of UWS/VS, MCS (minus or plus) and EMCS were determined based on the presence of specific Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) subscale items, assessed by a trained neurologist. The hierarchical order of consciousness levels from worst to best is UWS/VS, MCS-, MCS+, and EMCS.
14 days after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Changes in Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores after 7 days of treatment
7 days after treatment
Changes in sub scale of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores after 7 days of treatment
7 days after treatment
Changes in Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores after 14 days of treatment
14 days after treatment
Changes in sub scale of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores after 14 days of treatment
14 days after treatment
Changes in ABCD model classification after 14 days of treatment
14 days after treatment
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation group
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the treatment group will receive transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation at hand twelve jing-well points for 14 consecutive days, twice a day, combined with conventional treatment or rehabilitation for patients with DoC.
Sham electrical stimulation group
SHAM COMPARATORPatients randomized to the Sham electrical stimulation group will receive sham electrical acupoint stimulation at hand twelve jing-well points for 14 consecutive days, twice a day, combined with conventional treatment or rehabilitation for patients with DoC.
Interventions
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation at hand twelve jing-well points
Sham electrical acupoint stimulation at hand twelve jing-well points
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 18-80 years old;
- From 7 to 90 days since brain injury;
- Diagnosed in VS/UWS or MCS as defined by at least two CRS-R assessments performed during the screening period
- Acquired cerebral damage of known etiology
- Intact hand skin
- Informed consent given by the legal surrogate
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who continuously receive sedative drugs and Na+ or Ca2+ channel blockers (e.g., carbamazepine) or NMDA receptor antagonists (e.g., dextromethorphan)
- History of previous serious、progressive neurological disorder prior to the brain injury;
- Epilepsy and seizure
- Unstable vital signs or life-threatening comorbidities
- Implanted devices: including cardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), deep brain stimulators, ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts, and other indwelling electronic or neurosurgical implants.
- Documented pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xijing Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Xijing Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All study members are blinded to randomization except the following: electrical stimulation operators in each investigation site. Electrical stimulation operators are independent of all other components of the trial and are responsible for participant randomization as well as the administration of both active TEAS and sham interventions. Consequently, they are aware of treatment allocation. To minimize bias, they will not be involved in outcome assessment, data collection beyond the intervention procedures, or statistical analysis, and will be required to maintain strict confidentiality regarding group assignments throughout the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2026
First Posted
April 17, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04