Predictors of Clinical Response After Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Steroid Injection for Cervical Radiculopathy
M-DICER
1 other identifier
observational
107
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cervical epidural steroid injection is a commonly used treatment option for patients with cervical radicular pain who do not improve adequately with conservative treatment. Cervical radicular pain typically radiates from the neck to the shoulder, arm, or hand and may be accompanied by numbness, weakness or changes in reflexes. The most common causes are cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis. By reducing inflammation around the affected nerve root, epidural steroid injection may help relieve pain and improve function. Among available techniques, the interlaminar approach is frequently preferred in the cervical region because of its technical feasibility and safety profile. Although interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection is widely used, treatment response varies among patients, and not all individuals experience the same degree of benefit. Identifying the factors associated with better or poorer clinical response may help improve patient selection and reduce unnecessary procedures. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes after interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection in patients with cervical radiculopathy and to investigate demographic, clinical, and procedure-related variables which may predict treatment response. By analyzing pain scores before and after the procedure, this study seeks to better define the predictors of clinical outcome following this intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2026
CompletedApril 17, 2026
April 1, 2026
8.3 years
April 10, 2026
April 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment response at 6 months (IMMPACT-defined responder rate)
Responder defined as ≥50% reduction or ≥4-point decrease in NRS-11 compared with baseline.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in NRS-11 pain score from baseline
Baseline, 1 months, and 6 months
Study Arms (1)
Patients Undergoing Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection
This cohort includes eligible patients with cervical radiculopathy due to cervical disc herniation who received interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection during the study period. In patients who received more than one procedure, only the first injection was analyzed. Clinical response was evaluated retrospectively based on pain scores documented before the procedure and during follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of adult patients with cervical radiculopathy related to cervical disc herniation who underwent interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection at the Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Pain Clinic between January 1, 2018, and October 1, 2025. Only patients who met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and had available pre-procedural, procedural, and post-procedural follow-up data, including Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) pain scores, were included in the analysis.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Presence of neck and upper extremity pain consistent with cervical radiculopathy
- Persistence of symptoms for at least 1 month despite conservative treatment
- Documented baseline NRS-11 pain score prior to the procedure and follow-up NRS-11 data available through at least 6 months after treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Active infection during the time of injection
- Allergie to local anesthetics or contrast agents
- History of bleeding diathesis.
- Insufficient follow-up data (less than 6 months of follow-up NRS-11 documentation).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Pain Medicine, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine
Mersin, Ciftlikkoy, 33110, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Yolcu G, Toprak CS, Sencan S, Gunduz OH. Dry Needling Plus Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections: Do We Have More Favorable Results in Cervical Disc Herniation? A Randomized Sham-Controlled Clinical Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Dec 1;103(12):1081-1087. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002509.
PMID: 39671525BACKGROUNDYildiz G, Perdecioglu GRG, Akkaya OT, Can E, Yuruk D. Comparison of Selective Nerve Root Pulsed Radiofrequency Vs Paramedian Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Painful Cervical Radiculopathy. Pain Physician. 2024 Feb;27(2):E221-E229.
PMID: 38324787BACKGROUNDSacaklidir R, Sanal-Toprak C, Yucel FN, Gunduz OH, Sencan S. The Effect of Central Sensitization on Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Cervical Disc Herniation: An Observational Study. Pain Physician. 2022 Sep;25(6):E823-E829.
PMID: 36122265BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2026
First Posted
April 17, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion
April 10, 2026
Last Updated
April 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be made available because the study is based on retrospectively collected medical record data from a single center, and sharing such data may raise confidentiality and privacy concerns.