The Effect of Mandala Art Therapy, Psychological Resilience, Coping With Cancer, Colorectal Cancer Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of mandala art therapy on psychological resilience and coping with cancer in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial with a pre-test-post-test design, including intervention and control groups. The study will be conducted between January 2026 and December 2026 with patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. The G.power 3.1.9.7 program was used for sample size calculation. The sample size was determined as 28 individuals in each group, considering equal sample sizes in the experimental and control groups, a 95% confidence interval (type I error 5%), and statistical power of 80% (type II error 20%) with an effect size of d=0.50. However, considering a possible 20% data loss, 35 individuals will be included in each group, resulting in a total sample size of 70 individuals. Sample selection will be made using sequential sampling according to inclusion criteria. Patients will then be randomly assigned to the experimental group (A) and the control group (B) using block randomization (four-block). First, 15 blocks of four, such as AABB, ABAB, ABBA, BBAA, BABA, BAAB, etc., will be prepared by the researcher and statistician. Individuals will then be divided into two groups according to the prepared list; this process will be repeated continuously until the sample size is complete. Three data collection forms were used. SPSS 22.00 software package was used for data analysis. Skewness and kurtosis analyses were performed to determine the normality of the data distribution. Frequency (n) and percentage (%) distributions were calculated to determine the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the participants. Independent samples t-test was used to determine the mean differences between two independent groups, dependent samples t-test was used to compare pre- and post-intervention measurements, and repeated measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. Cohen's d effect size was calculated to evaluate the significance of the difference between groups in terms of the intervention. The statistical significance level was accepted as p\<0.05.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
April 16, 2026
April 1, 2026
5 months
April 10, 2026
April 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Patient Information Form on experimental group
The form includes personal information such as age, gender, marital status, education level, employment status, smoking, and alcohol use; and clinical information such as family history of cancer, loss of life due to cancer, stage of cancer diagnosis, stoma placement, and metastasis status.
1 day
Cognitive Emotional Coping Scale with Cancer pre-test post-test on experimental group
The scale consists of 21 items and 5 sub-dimensions (cognitive avoidance, cognitive re-evaluation, distraction and suppression, optimism and hope, uncontrollable thoughts) and is a 6-point Likert scale. The scale is answered as follows: "Strongly Disagree" (0), "Disagree" (1), "Partially Disagree" (2), "Partially Agree" (3), "Agree" (4), "Strongly Agree" (5) (Appendix-2). The minimum score on the scale is 0 and the maximum score is 105. It is known that as the score on the scale increases, the coping abilities of individuals also increase.
1 day
Short Psychological Resilience Scale pre-test post-test on experimental group
The scale measures psychological resilience. The scale is prepared in a 5-point Likert type and contains 6 items. The scale is answered as follows: "Not suitable at all" (1), "Not suitable" (2), "Somewhat suitable" (3), "Suitable" (4), The answer is "Completely Appropriate" (5). Items 2, 4 and 6 on the scale are reverse coded. A high score on the scale indicates high psychological resilience.
1 day
Patient Information Form on control group
The form includes personal information such as age, gender, marital status, education level, employment status, smoking, and alcohol use; and clinical information such as family history of cancer, loss of life due to cancer, stage of cancer diagnosis, stoma placement, and metastasis status.
1 day
Cognitive Emotional Coping Scale with Cancer pre-test post-test on control group
The scale consists of 21 items and 5 sub-dimensions (cognitive avoidance, cognitive re-evaluation, distraction and suppression, optimism and hope, uncontrollable thoughts) and is a 6-point Likert scale. The scale is answered as follows: "Strongly Disagree" (0), "Disagree" (1), "Partially Disagree" (2), "Partially Agree" (3), "Agree" (4), "Strongly Agree" (5) (Appendix-2). The minimum score on the scale is 0 and the maximum score is 105. It is known that as the score on the scale increases, the coping abilities of individuals also increase.
1 day
Short Psychological Resilience Scale pre-test post-test on control group
The scale measures psychological resilience. The scale is prepared in a 5-point Likert type and contains 6 items. The scale is answered as follows: "Not suitable at all" (1), "Not suitable" (2), "Somewhat suitable" (3), "Suitable" (4), The answer is "Completely Appropriate" (5). Items 2, 4 and 6 on the scale are reverse coded. A high score on the scale indicates high psychological resilience.
1 day
Study Arms (2)
The application of mandala art therapy to patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery
EXPERIMENTALColorectal cancer patients
rutine service operation
OTHERColorectal cancer patients
Interventions
Mandala art therapy was applied to the experimental group in the postoperative period.
No additional intervention will be made to the control group; only data collection forms will be applied.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To communicate,
- Aged 18 or older,
- Agreed to participate
- Scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery.
- No physical disability of the upper extremities,
- no visual problems,
- no history of psychotic drug use,
- pain intensity and fatigue level ≤3 points according to VAS-10 before MST application,
- will be hospitalized for 3 days postoperatively,
You may not qualify if:
- Over 74 years old,
- has not completed mandala art therapy application,
- is not compliant with the application,
- has a history of previous psychiatric diagnosis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sivas Cumhuriyet University
Sivas, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Doğan, T. (2015). Kısa Psikolojik Sağlamlık Ölçeği'nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması Adaptation of the Brief Resilience Scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Içinde The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being (C. 3, Sayı 1).
BACKGROUNDCwik, J. C., Vaganian, L., Bussmann, S., Labouvie, H., Houwaart, S., Gerlach, A. L., & Kusch, M. (2021). Assessment of coping with cancer-related burdens: psychometric properties of the Cognitive-Emotional Coping with Cancer scale and the German Mini-mental Adjustment to Cancer scale. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research & Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/or9.0000000000000046
BACKGROUNDSmith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Melis BOZOGLU
İstanbul Atlas University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pınar YILMAZ EKER
Cumhuriyet University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ayşegül KAYA İMREK
Cumhuriyet University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Çağla TOPRAK
İstanbul Atlas University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- This study will utilize a sequential sampling method. Patients will then be randomly assigned to the experimental group (A) and the control group (B) using block randomization (four-block). First, 15 blocks of four, such as AABB, ABAB, ABBA, BBAA, BABA, BAAB, etc., will be prepared by the researcher and statistician. Individuals will then be divided into two groups according to the prepared list; this process will be repeated continuously until the sample size is complete.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asst. Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2026
First Posted
April 16, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be collected for six months.
We plan to publish the study in an international journal.