NCT07531329

Brief Summary

Brief Summary This prospective, multicenter study evaluates whether delayed PSMA PET imaging improves diagnostic efficacy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7) compared with standard imaging in patients with suspected newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Each patient serves as their own control, with diagnostic performance compared between standard (60-minute) and delayed (2-3 hour) acquisitions. Background PSMA PET has transformed prostate cancer imaging, with emerging evidence suggesting delayed acquisition may further improve diagnostic accuracy by increasing tumor-to-background ratio. Recent studies demonstrate that delayed imaging significantly reduces equivocal findings and enhances detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Need While standard PSMA PET is well-validated, prospective multicenter data specifically evaluating the incremental diagnostic value of delayed imaging for clinically significant prostate cancer in treatment-naïve patients are lacking. This study addresses this gap by systematically comparing standard and delayed imaging in a large, well-defined cohort. Primary Outcome The primary outcome is to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of delayed SUVmax versus standard SUVmax for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), and to determine whether delayed imaging is superior to standard imaging. Secondary Outcomes

  1. 1.Optimal diagnostic thresholds for delayed imaging
  2. 2.Determine the optimal threshold for delayed SUVmax using ROC analysis with the Youden index;
  3. 3.Determine the optimal threshold for ΔSUVmax (delayed minus standard SUVmax);
  4. 4.Validate the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of these thresholds in an independent validation set.
  5. 5.Biopsy avoidance potential In patients with PI RADS 4-5 lesions, calculate the negative predictive value (NPV) using a predefined high threshold to estimate the proportion who could safely avoid biopsy.
  6. 6.Diagnostic performance in key subgroups Compare the AUC of delayed SUVmax versus standard SUVmax for csPCa detection in patients with PI RADS 2-3 and in those with PI RADS 4-5.
  7. 7.Additional lesion detection Proportion of patients with additional csPCa lesions detected only on delayed imaging, and the proportion whose PI RADS category would be upgraded based on these findings.
  8. 8.Clinical decision impact Proportion of patients in whom management recommendations would change after incorporating delayed imaging results, compared with standard imaging alone.
  9. 9.Exploratory subgroup analyses Stratify by PSA level (\<4, 4 10, \>10 ng/mL) and PSA density (\<0.10, 0.10-0.20, \>0.20 ng/mL/cc) to identify subgroups that derive the greatest benefit from delayed imaging; additionally, explore combined subgroups such as PI RADS 3 with PSA 4-10 or PSAD 0.10-0.20.
  10. 10.Suspected prostate cancer based on elevated PSA (≥4.0 ng/mL) or clinical symptoms
  11. 11.Undergo PSMA PET (standard + delayed) prior to prostate biopsy
  12. 12.Willing to undergo prostate biopsy
  13. 13.Provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
23mo left

Started Mar 2021

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

9 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress73%
Mar 2021Mar 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 5, 2021

Completed
5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 11, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2026

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 5, 2028

Last Updated

April 15, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6.7 years

First QC Date

March 11, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 8, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Prostate CancerPSMA PETDelayed imagingDiagnosticEfficacy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Delayed SUVmax vs. Standard SUVmax for csPCa

    Compare the AUC of delayed SUVmax versus standard SUVmax for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (ISUP grade group ≥2) using the DeLong test , to determine whether delayed imaging is superior.

    [Time Frame: Baseline (comparison of standard vs. delayed images)]

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Optimal Threshold of Delayed SUVmax for csPCa

    Baseline

  • Optimal Threshold of ΔSUVmax (Delayed Minus Standard) for csPCa

    Baseline

  • Diagnostic Performance of Optimal Thresholds in Validation Cohort

    Baseline

  • Negative Predictive Value for Biopsy Avoidance in PI-RADS 4-5 Patients

    Baseline

  • AUC of Delayed vs. Standard Imaging in PI-RADS 2-3 and PI-RADS 4-5 Subgroups

    Baseline

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Study Cohort

All enrolled patients with suspected prostate cancer undergo both standard and delayed PSMA PET imaging. Each patient serves as their own control, with diagnostic performance compared between the standard imaging phase and the delayed imaging phase.

Diagnostic Test: [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT with Delayed Pelvic PET-Only Acquisition

Interventions

All enrolled patients undergo a dual-phase PSMA PET/CT imaging protocol consisting of: (1) a standard whole-body PET/CT acquisition performed at approximately 60 minutes after intravenous administration of \[⁶⁸Ga\]Ga-PSMA-11; and (2) a delayed pelvic PET acquisition performed at approximately 2-3 hours post-injection (exact timing to be standardized across participating centers based on local protocols and clinical workflow). The delayed phase does not include a separate CT scan; images are reconstructed using the CT dataset obtained from the initial whole-body acquisition for attenuation correction.

Study Cohort

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population consists of a consecutive series of patients with suspected prostate cancer based on elevated PSA levels (≥4.0 ng/mL) who are referred for initial diagnostic evaluation at participating centers. All enrolled patients undergo dual-phase \[⁶⁸Ga\]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging (standard whole-body acquisition at approximately 60 minutes post-injection, followed by delayed pelvic PET acquisition at approximately 2-3 hours post-injection) prior to transrectal or transperineal prostate biopsy. Eligible patients must have no prior history of prostate cancer-related treatment and no other active malignancy within the past two years. This prospective cohort represents a typical diagnostic population in whom the incremental value of delayed PSMA PET imaging for prostate cancer detection is being investigated.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with suspected prostate cancer and a PSA level ≥4.0 ng/mL
  • Patients who undergo PSMA PET imaging (including delayed phase imaging) prior to prostate biopsy
  • Patients who are willing to undergo prostate biopsy
  • Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have received any prior prostate cancer-related treatment before the initial PSMA PET scan
  • Patients with a history of other malignancies within the past two years
  • Patients judged by the study investigator to be at risk for serious complications that could interfere with the normal conduct of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

The First Hospital of Lanzhou University

Lanzhou, Gansu, China

RECRUITING

General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University

Yinchuan, Ningxia, China

RECRUITING

Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital

Xining, Qinghai, China

RECRUITING

Weinan Central Hospita

Weinan, Shaanxi, China

RECRUITING

Xijing 986 Hospital

Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China

RECRUITING

Xijing Hospital

Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China

RECRUITING

Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

RECRUITING

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine

Xianyang, Shaanxi, China

RECRUITING

Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University

Yan’an, Shaanxi, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic NeoplasmsDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Jianhua Jiao, MD.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CROSSOVER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2026

First Posted

April 15, 2026

Study Start

March 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 5, 2028

Last Updated

April 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations