NCT07529756

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to gather additional safety and performance (effectiveness) data on the device for the treatment of symptomatic lower extremity venous obstructions and occlusions. The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • What is the observed rate of safety events through the 30-day follow-up?
  • What is the rate of technical success (acute procedural success) achieved at the index procedure? Participants already undergoing treatment with the Recana as part of their regular medical care will be followed for 1 year.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
86

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
33mo left

Started Jun 2026

Typical duration for all trials

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2026

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 14, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2026

Expected
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2028

3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2029

Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

in-stent restenosisvenous obstruction or occlusionthrombusemboliCALIBER Registryrecanalizationdebulking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Composite of Major Adverse Events (MAE)

    Composite of Major Adverse Events (MAE) where MAE is a combined clinical endpoint of death (all-cause mortality), major bleeding, and symptomatic pulmonary embolism

    From Index Procedure (Day 0) to 30-Days Post-Procedure

  • Technical Success (Acute Procedural Success)

    * In-stent restenosis (ISR) venous segment: defined as patency ≥50% luminal diameter utilizing IVUS * Native venous segment: defined as patency ≥50% luminal diameter utilizing IVUS

    Index Procedure (Day 0)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Incidence rates of the following: (1) Individual components of the MAE composite endpoint; (2) Minor bleeding; and (3) Access site complications from the index procedure (hematoma, false aneurysm, perforation)

    From Index Procedure (Day 0) to 30-Days Post-Procedure

  • Incidence rate of device-related death

    From Index Procedure (Day 0) through study completion assessed up to 365-days post-procedure

  • Incidence rate of procedure-related death

    From Index Procedure (Day 0) through study completion assessed up to 365-days post-procedure

  • Patency rates of Target Venous Segment (TVS)

    From Index Procedure (Day 0) through study completion assessed up to 365-days post-procedure

  • Incidence rate of device-related rethrombosis of the Target Venous Segment (TVS)

    From Index Procedure (Day 0) through study completion assessed up to 365-days post-procedure

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Additional Safety Outcome Measures through 30-days post-procedure in the Primary Analysis Cohort

    From Index Procedure (Day 0) through 30-Days Post-Procedure

  • Additional Safety Outcome Measures through 365-days post-procedure in the Primary Analysis Cohort

    From Index Procedure (Day 0) through study completion assessed up to 365-days post-procedure

  • Post-procedural average effective stent diameter (percent) in the Primary Analysis Cohort

    Immediately after the intervention/procedure (Day 0)

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Primary Safety Analysis Cohort

The Primary Safety Analysis cohort is comprised of the first 86 subjects that enroll with a clinical presentation analogous to that used for the literature-derived performance goal, and whose data is available for analysis. These subjects will not have been treated with thrombolytic or undergone percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy within 3 months prior to treatment.

Device: mechanical thrombectomy

Primary Effectiveness Analysis Cohort

The Primary Effectiveness Analysis cohort is 86 subjects who undergo treatment with the Recana Thrombectomy Catheter System and whose data is available for analysis.

Device: mechanical thrombectomy

Full Analysis Dataset

The Full Analysis Dataset is comprised of up to 500 subjects inclusive of subjects who sign consent, meet eligibility criteria and are treated with the Recana Thrombectomy Catheter System.

Interventions

Mechanical thrombectomy with the Recana Thrombectomy Catheter System

Primary Effectiveness Analysis CohortPrimary Safety Analysis Cohort

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Potential subjects with symptomatic lower extremity obstruction/occlusion

INCLUSION CRITERA: A. Native Vessel: 1. INC-1: Subject is 18 years or older 2. INC-2: Proximal lower extremity obstruction/occlusion involving the femoral, common femoral, iliac veins, or inferior vena cava (IVC), alone or in combination that in the opinion of the investigator, treatment with the Recana would benefit the patient 3. INC-3: Recana Thrombectomy Catheter System must enter vasculature 4. INC-4: Willing and able to provide written informed consent B. In-Stent Restenosis: 1. INC-1: Subject is 18 years or older 2. INC-2: Subjects with stents implanted greater than 6 weeks prior to index procedure 3. INC-3: Location of thrombosed stents in proximal lower extremity deep vein segments including common femoral, external iliac, common iliac vein, or inferior vena cava alone or in combination that in the opinion of the investigator treatment with the Recana would benefit the patient 4. INC-4: Recana Thrombectomy Catheter System must enter vasculature 5. INC-5: Willing and able to provide written informed consent EXCLUSION CRITERA A. Native Vessel: 1. EXC-1: IVC aplasia/hypoplasia or other congenital anatomic anomalies of the IVC or iliac veins 2. EXC-2: IVC filter in place at the time of index procedure that, in the judgment of the investigator, may interfere with the procedure 3. EXC-3: Congenital anatomic anomalies of the iliac veins that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude treatment with the Recana 4. EXC-4: Heparin allergy or hypersensitivity that cannot be adequately managed with alternate anticoagulant during or after the procedure, or prior diagnosis of HIT (Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia) 5. EXC-5: Severe, life-threatening allergy to iodine or contrast dye 6. EXC-6: Any contraindication to anticoagulants or antiplatelets that, in the opinion of the Investigator, cannot be medically managed throughout the study period 7. EXC-7: Life expectancy less than 1 year 8. EXC-8: Chronic non-ambulatory status such as long-term wheelchair requirement or bedridden status 9. EXC-9: Known hypercoagulable states that, in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be medically managed throughout the study period 10. EXC-10: Inability to secure venous access and cross lesion 11. EXC-11: Subject has any condition for which, in the opinion of the Investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the subject 12. EXC-12: Current active participation in another investigational drug or device study in which the primary endpoint has not been analyzed B. In-Stent Restenosis: 1. EXC-1: Exposed stents with broken struts, significantly deformed struts, struts protruding into the vessel 2. EXC-2: Stent failure caused by undersizing or malapposition of the stent(s) \[For example, the segment of a stent in the iliac vein that is not wall apposed or cannot be apposed to the wall after balloon dilation is excluded. The segment of a stent that extends into the IVC that is not wall apposed would not be excluded.\] 3. EXC-3: Stents compressed to \<6mm that remain \<6mm after balloon dilation 4. EXC-4: IVC filter in place at the time of index procedure that, in the judgment of the investigator, may interfere with the procedure 5. EXC-5: Congenital anatomic anomalies of the iliac veins that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude treatment with the Recana 6. EXC-6: Heparin allergy or hypersensitivity that cannot be adequately managed with alternate anticoagulant during or after the procedure, or prior diagnosis of HIT (Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia) 7. EXC-7: Severe, life-threatening allergy to iodine or contrast dye 8. EXC-8: Any contraindication to anticoagulants or antiplatelets that, in the opinion of the Investigator, cannot be medically managed throughout the study period 9. EXC-9: Life expectancy less than 1 year 10. EXC-10: Chronic non-ambulatory status such as long-term wheelchair requirement or bedridden status 11. EXC-11: Known hypercoagulable states that, in the opinion of the Investigator, cannot be medically managed throughout the study period 12. EXC-12: Inability to secure venous access and cross lesion 13. EXC-13: Subject has any condition for which, in the opinion of the Investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the subject 14. EXC-14: Current active participation in another investigational drug or device study in which the primary endpoint has not been analyzed

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Blindness, CorticalVenous ThrombosisThrombosisEmbolism and ThrombosisBites and StingsEmbolism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BlindnessVision DisordersSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesEye DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPoisoningChemically-Induced DisordersWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • William A Marston, MD

    University of North Carolina

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Kush R Desai, MD

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sameh Sayfo, MD, MBA

    Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital - Plano

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Clinical Affairs Team

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2026

First Posted

April 14, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share