Cardiorespiratory Prevention and Rehabilitation Program (PROCOR): Assessment and Prescription of Exercises for People With Cardiometabolic Diseases.
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The global aging of the population presents significant challenges to health and quality of life, especially among the elderly, who face a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors. Additionally, aging is associated with increases in blood pressure (BP) and a gradual loss of functional capacity. On the other hand, physical exercise improves various cardiometabolic and functional aspects of the elderly. However, determining the ideal weekly frequency of physical training for this population is uncertain, requiring further investigation of the manipulation of this training variable on overall health parameters. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of two different weekly frequencies of combined training on the functional capacity, hemodynamic, and anthropometric aspects of elderly individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors. The study adopted an uncontrolled clinical trial design, focused on investigating the effects of combined training over 12 weeks, conducted at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) and involved elderly participants from the Cardiopulmonary Prevention and Rehabilitation Program (PROCOR). Participants underwent a wide range of assessments, including anthropometric measurements, functional capacity tests through the Senior Fitness Test battery and the 1000-meter test, as well as blood pressure assessments using automatic equipment. Then, participants were divided into two groups: G2x, which trained twice a week, and G3x, which trained three times a week during the intervention period, which consisted of three mesocycles of four weeks each with intensity progression. Data analysis was performed by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP), using generalized estimating equations, with Bonferroni post-hoc adjustment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2026
CompletedApril 14, 2026
April 1, 2026
4 months
March 25, 2026
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
change in strength
Lower limb strength was measured using the 30-second sit-to-stand test. The test result used was the number of repetitions performed in this time, in one attempt. Upper limb strength was assessed using the 30-second arm curl test, with a 2.0 kg dumbbell for women and a 4.0 kg dumbbell for men. The test result was the total number of curls completed in a single attempt with the dominant arm.
Baseline and 12 weeks
change in balance/Agility
Agility/dynamic balance was measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The test result was the shortest time to stand up from a seated position, walk 3.00 meters, turn around, and return to the seated position. The TUG was performed at two walking speeds (maximum and usual), with two attempts for each, and the shortest time of each speed was recorded.
Baseline and 12 weeks
change in flexibility
Flexibility was assessed using the sit-and-reach test, in which participants sat on a mat with their legs fully extended and their feet placed against a box used for the test, reaching forward. The total distance reached represented the final score, with two reach attempts recorded.
Baseline and 12 weeks
change in cardiorespiratory fitness
Aerobic capacity was evaluated using two tests: the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), which participants completed one attempt, and the result was the total distance covered in that time; and the 1000-meter test (1000m), that was developed due to the presence of a ceiling effect observed in the 6MWT in many participants in previous PROCOR training semesters, in which participants also made one attempt, and the score was the total time in seconds to complete the distance, allowing walking and/or running.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in clinic systolic blood pressure
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in clinic diastolic blood pressure
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in clinic mean blood pressure
Baseline and 12 weeks
change in fasting glucose
Baseline and 12 weeks
change in total cholesterol
Baseline and 12 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Exercise Group 2 times per week
EXPERIMENTALThe group training twice per week (G2x) performed sessions on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The training consisted in aerobic exercise combined with strength training. Further details are specified in the intervention description.
Exercise Group 3 times per week
EXPERIMENTALThe group trained three times a week (G3x) had sessions on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. For those who trained three times a week, two sessions with speed variation and one with incline were assigned. The training consisted in aerobic exercise combined with strength training. Further details are specified in the intervention description.
Interventions
Aerobic training consisted of interval and pyramidal treadmill exercises, with participants autonomously adjusting speed and incline according to their perceived exertion. Those in G2x alternated equally between speed- and incline-focused sessions. Strength training included bench press, leg press, seated row, and abductor machine exercises. At the start of each mesocycle, a load assessment test was conducted using two sets with the same load; adjustments were made based on second-set performance to maintain the prescribed repetition range. Participants were familiarized with the Borg 6-20 scale, treadmill speed and incline adjustments, and resistance exercises, receiving instruction on proper technique and selection of an appropriate initial load.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and/or another cardiovascular disease;
- Provide medical documentation confirming the diagnosis (e.g., medical report or prescription);
- Present a medical clearance for participation in physical exercise issued by a cardiologist or endocrinologist;
- If diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, provide a recent exercise stress test at the beginning of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Not properly using medication for an existing chronic condition;
- Presenting severe complications of the existing chronic condition (e.g., severe autonomic neuropathy in individuals with Diabetes);
- Having muscular and/or joint impairments that prevent the performance of physical exercise.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sports Center - Federal University of Santa Catarina
Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88035-972, Brazil
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aline Mendes Gerage, PhD
Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2026
First Posted
April 14, 2026
Study Start
March 3, 2024
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 15, 2024
Last Updated
April 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04