NCT07529158

Brief Summary

The global aging of the population presents significant challenges to health and quality of life, especially among the elderly, who face a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors. Additionally, aging is associated with increases in blood pressure (BP) and a gradual loss of functional capacity. On the other hand, physical exercise improves various cardiometabolic and functional aspects of the elderly. However, determining the ideal weekly frequency of physical training for this population is uncertain, requiring further investigation of the manipulation of this training variable on overall health parameters. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of two different weekly frequencies of combined training on the functional capacity, hemodynamic, and anthropometric aspects of elderly individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors. The study adopted an uncontrolled clinical trial design, focused on investigating the effects of combined training over 12 weeks, conducted at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) and involved elderly participants from the Cardiopulmonary Prevention and Rehabilitation Program (PROCOR). Participants underwent a wide range of assessments, including anthropometric measurements, functional capacity tests through the Senior Fitness Test battery and the 1000-meter test, as well as blood pressure assessments using automatic equipment. Then, participants were divided into two groups: G2x, which trained twice a week, and G3x, which trained three times a week during the intervention period, which consisted of three mesocycles of four weeks each with intensity progression. Data analysis was performed by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP), using generalized estimating equations, with Bonferroni post-hoc adjustment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 3, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 15, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 25, 2026

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 14, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • change in strength

    Lower limb strength was measured using the 30-second sit-to-stand test. The test result used was the number of repetitions performed in this time, in one attempt. Upper limb strength was assessed using the 30-second arm curl test, with a 2.0 kg dumbbell for women and a 4.0 kg dumbbell for men. The test result was the total number of curls completed in a single attempt with the dominant arm.

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • change in balance/Agility

    Agility/dynamic balance was measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The test result was the shortest time to stand up from a seated position, walk 3.00 meters, turn around, and return to the seated position. The TUG was performed at two walking speeds (maximum and usual), with two attempts for each, and the shortest time of each speed was recorded.

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • change in flexibility

    Flexibility was assessed using the sit-and-reach test, in which participants sat on a mat with their legs fully extended and their feet placed against a box used for the test, reaching forward. The total distance reached represented the final score, with two reach attempts recorded.

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • change in cardiorespiratory fitness

    Aerobic capacity was evaluated using two tests: the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), which participants completed one attempt, and the result was the total distance covered in that time; and the 1000-meter test (1000m), that was developed due to the presence of a ceiling effect observed in the 6MWT in many participants in previous PROCOR training semesters, in which participants also made one attempt, and the score was the total time in seconds to complete the distance, allowing walking and/or running.

    Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Change in clinic systolic blood pressure

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • Change in clinic diastolic blood pressure

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • Change in clinic mean blood pressure

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • change in fasting glucose

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • change in total cholesterol

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Exercise Group 2 times per week

EXPERIMENTAL

The group training twice per week (G2x) performed sessions on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The training consisted in aerobic exercise combined with strength training. Further details are specified in the intervention description.

Behavioral: PROCOR 2024.1

Exercise Group 3 times per week

EXPERIMENTAL

The group trained three times a week (G3x) had sessions on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. For those who trained three times a week, two sessions with speed variation and one with incline were assigned. The training consisted in aerobic exercise combined with strength training. Further details are specified in the intervention description.

Behavioral: PROCOR 2024.1

Interventions

PROCOR 2024.1BEHAVIORAL

Aerobic training consisted of interval and pyramidal treadmill exercises, with participants autonomously adjusting speed and incline according to their perceived exertion. Those in G2x alternated equally between speed- and incline-focused sessions. Strength training included bench press, leg press, seated row, and abductor machine exercises. At the start of each mesocycle, a load assessment test was conducted using two sets with the same load; adjustments were made based on second-set performance to maintain the prescribed repetition range. Participants were familiarized with the Borg 6-20 scale, treadmill speed and incline adjustments, and resistance exercises, receiving instruction on proper technique and selection of an appropriate initial load.

Exercise Group 2 times per weekExercise Group 3 times per week

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have a diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and/or another cardiovascular disease;
  • Provide medical documentation confirming the diagnosis (e.g., medical report or prescription);
  • Present a medical clearance for participation in physical exercise issued by a cardiologist or endocrinologist;
  • If diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, provide a recent exercise stress test at the beginning of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not properly using medication for an existing chronic condition;
  • Presenting severe complications of the existing chronic condition (e.g., severe autonomic neuropathy in individuals with Diabetes);
  • Having muscular and/or joint impairments that prevent the performance of physical exercise.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sports Center - Federal University of Santa Catarina

Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88035-972, Brazil

Location

Study Officials

  • Aline Mendes Gerage, PhD

    Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study was characterized as an uncontrolled and pragmatic clinical trial, as it sought to establish a cause-and-effect relationship based on the object of study, its objective being explanatory and of an applied nature, allowing knowledge for practice and serving as an instrument for problem-solving.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2026

First Posted

April 14, 2026

Study Start

March 3, 2024

Primary Completion

June 30, 2024

Study Completion

December 15, 2024

Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations