Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block and Combined Adductor Canal Block Plus IPACK Block in Knee Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block and combined Adductor Canal plus IPACK block in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in patients undergoing knee surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2028
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
2 years
April 7, 2026
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
opioid consumption
In the recovery room, all patients will given a patient- controlled analgesia device containing morphine 0.5 mg/ml, set to deliver a 1mg bolus dose of morphine with an 15 min lockout time and 4 mg 1 h limit.Total morphine consumption during the 24 hours postoperative period will recorded at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours).
24 hours after surgery
Verbal analog Pain Scores on rest and movement
A Research assistant, blinded to the group allocation, interviewed patients and collected data at 5 times intervals ( 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, hours) in the 24 hours postoperatively. Patients were asked to rate their pain using verbal analog scale, where 0= no pain and 10= worst pain possible.
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
incidences of adverse effects (like nausea and vomiting)
24 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Adductor canal block group(ACB)
Patients in the ACB group (Group I) will receive a single-shot adductor canal block under ultrasound guidance bupivacaine administered preoperatively.
Adductor canal + iPACK block group(ACB+IPACK)
Patients in the ACB + iPACK group (Group II) will receive a single-shot adductor canal block combined with an infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (iPACK) under ultrasound guidance bupivacaine.
Interventions
All patients in Group I will receive a preoperative adductor canal block. In all groups, an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device containing morphine will be administered for postoperative pain management.
All patients in Group II will receive a preoperative adductor canal block combined with an iPACK block. Postoperatively, all patients in both groups will be provided with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia containing morphine for pain management.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged ≥18 years, classified as ASA physical status I-III, scheduled to undergo total knee arthroplasty.
You may qualify if:
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I- ASA II-ASA III Patients
You may not qualify if:
- history of allergy to the study medication
- refusal to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Sibel Pehlivan
Kayseri, Talas, 38090, Turkey (Türkiye)
Sibel Seckin Pehlivan
Kayseri, 38039, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Shoni M, Samineni AV, Salavati S, Mikkilineni N, Wang A, Abdeen A, Freccero D. Combined Single-Shot Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee and Adductor Canal Block With Bupivacaine, Dexmedetomidine, and Dexamethasone for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Arthroplast Today. 2023 Dec 28;25:101292. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101292. eCollection 2024 Feb.
PMID: 38235397RESULTMariano ER, Kim TE, Wagner MJ, Funck N, Harrison TK, Walters T, Giori N, Woolson S, Ganaway T, Howard SK. A randomized comparison of proximal and distal ultrasound-guided adductor canal catheter insertion sites for knee arthroplasty. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Sep;33(9):1653-62. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.9.1653.
PMID: 25154949RESULT
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sibel Pehlivan
Erciyes Üniversitesi
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Teaching Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2026
First Posted
April 13, 2026
Study Start
April 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 15, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available within 12 months of study completion
- Access Criteria
- Data accept requests will be reviewed by an external independent Review Panel.Requesters will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.
De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.