Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer
Diagnostic Performance of F18-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
97
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
compare the accuracy and sensitivity of 18F FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT in detecting distant metastases in breast cancer
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2029
ExpectedApril 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
Same day
April 5, 2026
April 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT in detecting distant metastases.
Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT in detecting distant metastases.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Early staging and clinical management of breast cancer in attempt to improve survival and quality of life
12 months
Study Arms (1)
Breast cancer Patients
18 FDG PET CT scan for metastatic breast cancer
Eligibility Criteria
patients with metastatic breast cancer
You may qualify if:
- Patients with pathologically proven breast cancer
- Metastatic breast cancer proved by pathology or radiological modalities.
- Interval between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CE-CT from one to three weeks.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known concomitant malignancy
- Patients receive systemic treatment chemotherapy or radiotherapy between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CE-CT.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (9)
Niikura N,Costelloe CM,Madewell JE,Hayashi N,Yu TK,Liu J,Palla SL,Tokuda Y,Theriault RL,Hortobagyi GN,Ueno NT
BACKGROUNDPaydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, Emamzadehfard S, Shamchi SP, Gholami S, Werner TJ, Alavi A. The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Feb;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1181-3.
PMID: 29516387BACKGROUNDVercher-Conejero JL, Pelegri-Martinez L, Lopez-Aznar D, Cozar-Santiago Mdel P. Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2015 Mar 16;5(1):61-83. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics5010061.
PMID: 26854143BACKGROUNDZangheri B, Messa C, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Landoni C, Fazio F. PET/CT and breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Jun;31 Suppl 1:S135-42. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1536-7. Epub 2004 May 5.
PMID: 15133636BACKGROUNDVogsen M, Harbo F, Jakobsen NM, Nissen HJ, Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE, Gerke O, Jensen JD, Asmussen JT, Jylling AMB, Braad PE, Vach W, Ewertz M, Hildebrandt MG. Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study Comparing 18F-FDG PET/CT with Conventional CT. J Nucl Med. 2023 Mar;64(3):355-361. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263358. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
PMID: 36207136BACKGROUNDLoibl S, Poortmans P, Morrow M, Denkert C, Curigliano G. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1750-1769. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32381-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
PMID: 33812473BACKGROUNDHadebe B, Harry L, Ebrahim T, Pillay V, Vorster M. The Role of PET/CT in Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 6;13(4):597. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040597.
PMID: 36832085BACKGROUNDCardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Senkus E, Curigliano G, Aapro MS, Andre F, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bhattacharyya GS, Biganzoli L, Boyle F, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, El Saghir NS, Elzayat M, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Gelmon K, Gligorov J, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Hu X, Kaufman B, Kaur R, Kiely BE, Kim SB, Lin NU, Mertz SA, Neciosup S, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Prat A, Penault-Llorca F, Rugo HS, Sledge GW, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Wiseman T, Xu B, Norton L, Costa A, Winer EP. 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5). Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1623-1649. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 32979513BACKGROUNDFerlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516.
PMID: 21351269BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hebatallah Ahmed Abdelraof, Professor
nuclear medicine unit Assiut university
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 12 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2026
First Posted
April 13, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2029
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04