Efficacy and Safety of Intra-operative Dual Laparoscopy and Neo-rectoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy for Bowel Endometriosis: The LUMEN-01 Trial
LUMEN-01
2 other identifiers
interventional
192
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of intra-operative dual laparoscopy and neo-rectoscopy (IDLnR) versus conventional laparoscopy (CL) in patients with bowel endometriosis (BE) undergoing surgery. The primary objective is to assess differences in postoperative bowel function improvement at 6 months between the two groups. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a significant difference in postoperative bowel function (primary endpoint) at 6 months postoperatively between IDLnR and CL groups? Do the two groups differ in secondary outcomes, including efficacy indicators (LARS score/cure rate/improvement rate, CRADI-8, Wexner score, GIQLI, EHP-30, VAS pain reduction) and safety indicators (30-day severe complications, antibiotic use intensity, hospital stay \>7 days)? Researchers will randomize BE surgical patients to IDLnR or CL groups, then compare the above primary and secondary endpoints to evaluate IDLnR's clinical value. Participants will undergo either IDLnR or CL surgery for BE lesions, and be followed up to assess bowel function, quality of life, pain, and safety outcomes as specified. This study will fill evidence gaps for IDLnR in BE surgery, support its standardized application, optimize BE treatment strategies, and aim for complete lesion resection, preserved intestinal function, and improved long-term patient quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2028
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.6 years
April 4, 2026
April 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The improvement rate of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score grade at 6 months after bowel surgery.
Improvement was defined as a change in LARS grade at 6 months postoperatively from severe LARS to mild LARS or no LARS, or from mild LARS to no LARS. The LARS score was obtained using the LARS questionnaire. The definitions of each LARS grade are as follows: 1. No LARS: score 0-20; normal bowel function with no significant defecation-related distress and no impact on daily life or social activities. 2. Minor LARS: score 21-29; presence of symptoms such as flatus or fecal incontinence, increased stool frequency, or urgency, but mild in severity. These symptoms are largely controllable through dietary modification and bowel habit adjustment, with limited impact on quality of life. 3. Major LARS: score 30-42; severe symptoms including frequent fecal incontinence, intractable severe urgency, and cluster defecation, which significantly interfere with daily activities, social life, and psychological status and often require prof
baseline, and 6 months after bowel surgery
Secondary Outcomes (11)
LARS cure rate (LARS grade improved to no LARS at 12 months postoperatively)
baseline, and 12 months postoperatively
LARS improvement rate (decrease in LARS grade at 3 and 12 months postoperatively)
baseline, 3 and 12 months postoperatively
Change in LARS score (changes from baseline at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively)
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Change in Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory-8 (CRADI-8) score (change from baseline at 6 months postoperatively)
baseline, and 6 months postoperatively
Change in Wexner constipation score (change from baseline at 12 months postoperatively)
baseline, 12 months postoperatively
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CL group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will undergo standard laparoscopic surgery for the localization, observation, and resection of bowel endometriosis lesions.
IDLnR group
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group receives the novel IDLnR technique. The procedure begins with conventional laparoscopic exploration, followed by intra-operative neo-rectoscopy to check for mucosal involvement and identify lesion locations. After dual visualization, precise resection of bowel lesions is performed laparoscopically.
Interventions
Underwent localization, observation and resection of bowel lesions using conventional laparoscopy (CL). The surgery for bowel endometriosis was completed laparoscopically.
Underwent localization, observation and resection of bowel lesions using intra-operative Dual Laparoscopy and Neo-rectoscopy (IDLnR). The surgery for bowel endometriosis was completed laparoscopically.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Premenopausal women aged 18 to 55 years.
- Preoperative pelvic contrast-enhanced MRI and/or transrectal endosonography confirmed bowel endometriosis (BE) lesions involving the muscular layer of the intestinal wall, located in the rectum and/or sigmoid colon. Postoperative pathological diagnosis serves as the gold standard.
- Pre-treatment LARS score \> 20.
- Eligible for laparoscopic surgery.
- Voluntarily participated in this study and signed written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Presence of active inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, or other similar conditions with disease flare-ups within the past 1 year.
- Acute or severe infectious disease within 4 weeks prior to surgery.
- History of malignant tumor, or highly suspected gynecological/gastrointestinal malignancy based on preoperative imaging or tumor marker tests.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification ≥ Grade Ⅲ, or severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, or coagulation dysfunction that precludes general anesthesia and elective laparoscopic surgery.
- Undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery or open laparotomy.
- Currently participating in other clinical trials that may affect the outcome assessment of this study.
- Previous participation in other interventional clinical trials that may affect the outcome assessment of this study.
- History of colorectal resection and anastomosis or stoma surgery.
- History of pelvic radiotherapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of surgical intervention, blinding of surgeons and patients was not feasible. However, outcome assessors and data analysts remained blinded to group allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2026
First Posted
April 13, 2026
Study Start
April 25, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2028
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04