Dermocosmetic Treatment for Facial Redness in Rosacea With or Without Laser Therapy
Impact of Using a Dermocosmetic Product as Monotherapy or as an Adjunct to Laser Treatment on Redness Associated With Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea: a Comparative Study Versus Placebo.
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a dermocosmetic product in reducing facial redness and visible blood vessels associated with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Investigators will compare the dermocosmetic product to a placebo applied to opposite sides of the face, when used alone and in combination with laser treatment. Participants will apply the products twice daily for 2 month followed by continued use in combination with laser treatment, and will attend regular clinical visits for assessments and questionnaires.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
10 months
April 3, 2026
April 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of the dermocosmetic product
To evaluate the efficacy of the dermocosmetic product when used as a monotherapy and following laser treatment on visible microvessels and facial redness associated with rosacea.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Tolerance
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 months
Study Arms (2)
Split-Face dermocosmetic
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive both treatments in a split-face design, with the dermocosmetic product applied to one side of the face and placebo applied to the opposite side. Treatments are applied twice daily.
Split-Face placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants receive both treatments in a split-face design, with the dermocosmetic product applied to one side of the face and placebo applied to the opposite side. Treatments are applied twice daily.
Interventions
The dermocosmetic product will be applied topically to one side of the face twice daily.
The placebo is a dermocosmetic formulation identical in appearance, texture, and application to the active product but without active ingredients. It is applied topically to the opposite side of the face twice daily, following the same regimen as the active product.
Participants receive three sessions of vascular laser treatment performed at regular intervals during the study. Laser therapy is used as part of standard care to target facial redness and visible blood vessels. The dermocosmetic product and placebo continue to be applied as adjunct treatments during this phase.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gender: male or female
- Age: \> 18 years -Patients with mild to severe erythro-couperotic rosacea (stage 2, 3, or 4 - TRoSA scale, section 2.2.3.1)
- Patients wishing to undergo vascular laser treatments for their rosacea
- Patients who have provided informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant patients or patients with a positive urine pregnancy test at the initial visit
- Patients with another condition in the study area.
- Patients who have received laser treatment for the same condition within the previous 12 months.
- Patients with another form of rosacea (e.g., papules and pustules, ocular rosacea, etc.).
- Patients using another anti-redness product on the face during the study.
- Patients who have taken photosensitizing treatments during the month prior to study enrollment.
- Patients taking or having taken oral isotretinoin within 6 months prior to study enrollment.
- Patients enrolled in another study.
- Adult patients under a legal guardianship arrangement (guardianship, conservatorship, judicial protection).
- Patients not covered by social security.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ISISPHARMAlead
Related Publications (6)
Schaller M, Almeida LMC, Bewley A, Cribier B, Del Rosso J, Dlova NC, Gallo RL, Granstein RD, Kautz G, Mannis MJ, Micali G, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Steinhoff M, Tanghetti E, Thiboutot D, Troielli P, Webster G, Zierhut M, van Zuuren EJ, Tan J. Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel. Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1269-1276. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18420. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
PMID: 31392722BACKGROUNDChajra H, Nadim M, Auriol D, Schweikert K, Lefevre F. Combination of new multifunctional molecules for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea disorder. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Oct 1;8:501-10. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S92326. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26491365BACKGROUNDKowalska A, Kalinowska-Lis U. 18beta-Glycyrrhetinic acid: its core biological properties and dermatological applications. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2019 Aug;41(4):325-331. doi: 10.1111/ics.12548. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
PMID: 31166601BACKGROUNDCribier B. Rosacea: Treatment targets based on new physiopathology data. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Jun;149(2):99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
PMID: 34893359BACKGROUNDSchaller M, Almeida LM, Bewley A, Cribier B, Dlova NC, Kautz G, Mannis M, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Steinhoff M, Thiboutot D, Troielli P, Webster G, Wu Y, van Zuuren E, Tan J. Rosacea treatment update: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):465-471. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15173. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
PMID: 27861741BACKGROUNDTan J, Almeida LM, Bewley A, Cribier B, Dlova NC, Gallo R, Kautz G, Mannis M, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Steinhoff M, Thiboutot D, Troielli P, Webster G, Wu Y, van Zuuren EJ, Schaller M. Updating the diagnosis, classification and assessment of rosacea: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):431-438. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15122. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
PMID: 27718519BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivia BAUVIN, Doctor of Medicine
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Charles-Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, FRANCE
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2026
First Posted
April 13, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to sponsor confidentiality policies and in order to protect participant privacy and comply with applicable data protection regulations.