NCT07511738

Brief Summary

This cross-sectional observational study aims to test the original conceptual diagram of the Youth Physical Activity Promotion Model (YPAP) in Brazilian adolescents. The study evaluates the relationships among predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing correlates described in the YPAP framework and investigates how these correlates interact with one another according to the pathways proposed by the model. A convenience sample of adolescents aged 10 to 13 years will be recruited through broad public dissemination as part of a larger experimental intervention project. Data will be collected at a single time point. Instead of traditional linear analytical strategies, the study will adopt complex, flexible, and non-linear methods such as network analysis to examine how correlates interconnect and influence physical activity behavior. Secondary analyses will explore whether the structure and strength of associations differ across demographic subgroups such as sex and socioeconomic level.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
93

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
5mo left

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress18%
Apr 2026Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 6, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2026

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2026

Last Updated

April 9, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 3, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

adolescentsphysical activitycorrelatesYPAP model

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (17)

  • Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity (MVPA)

    Minutes per day spent in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous intensity, measured using ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers and classified according to Evenson cut-points.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Total Body Mass

    Total body mass will be measured using a digital electronic scale Filizola (model ID 1500; capacity: 150 kg; accuracy: 100 g). Measurements will be recorded in kilograms (kg).

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Standing and Sitting Height

    Standing height will be measured using a vertical stadiometer Sanny (model ES2020; millimetric scale; range up to 2.20 m), with the participant standing barefoot in the orthostatic position and the head aligned in the Frankfurt plane. Values will be recorded in centimeters (cm).

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Body Mass Index (BMI) will be calculated using measured total body mass and standing height, following World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (2007). Participants will be classified according to age- and sex-specific BMI nutritional status categories. Values will be expressed in kg/m².

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Waist Circumference

    Waist circumference will be measured using a metal measuring tape. Values will be recorded in centimeters (cm).

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR)

    The waist-to-height ratio will be calculated using measured waist circumference and standing height.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Body Fat Percentage

    Body fat percentage will be assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) using a Lunar scanner from GE Healthcare. The device will be calibrated according to manufacturer guidelines. Participants will remain in the supine position, motionless, with upper and lower limbs aligned. Scans will be performed in high resolution and analyzed by the same trained technician.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Cardiorespiratory Fitness (Yo-Yo IR1C)

    Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed using the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 adapted for children (YoYo IR1C). The protocol consists of repeated 16-meter shuttle runs interspersed with a 4-meter active recovery zone and 10-second rest periods. Running pace is controlled by audio cues from a dedicated application, with progressive speed increments until voluntary exhaustion. Maximum heart rate (HRmax) will be recorded using a heart rate sensor Polar Electro (model H10). Test termination will occur when the participant fails to reach the designated line twice consecutively or demonstrates significant fatigue. Results will be used to estimate maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and HRmax.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Motor Competence (KTK)

    Motor competence will be assessed using the Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder (KTK), developed by Klaus Kiphard and Friedhelm Schilling. The battery consists of four subtests evaluating distinct components of motor coordination: (1) dynamic balance through walking on beams of different widths; (2) speed and rhythm through two-foot lateral jumps performed for 15 seconds; (3) strength and motor control through single-leg jumps over progressively higher foam obstacles; and (4) lateral agility using two moving platforms over a fixed 20-second interval. Raw scores from each subtest will be converted into age- and sex-adjusted standardized scores and summed to generate a global motor index. All assessments will be conducted by trained evaluators to ensure procedural standardization and data reliability.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Cognitive Function (Tower of Hanoi)

    Cognitive function will be assessed using the three-disk Tower of Hanoi task. The test consists of a base with three pegs and three disks of different sizes and colors, initially stacked on the left peg with the smallest disk on top. Participants must transfer the entire tower to the right peg while following two rules: only one disk may be moved at a time, and a larger disk may not be placed on top of a smaller one. The entire procedure will be video recorded to allow quantification of the total number of moves and the total time required to complete the task.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Perceived Health Status

    Perceived health status will be assessed through a single question using a 5-point Likert scale. Adolescents will classify their health as: (1) poor, (2) fair, (3) good, (4) very good, or (5) excellent. Higher scores indicate better perceived health.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Motivation for Physical Activity (BREQ-2)

    Motivation for physical activity will be assessed using the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2), adapted for Portuguese. The questionnaire consists of items distributed across subscales evaluating amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation. Participants will respond on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Not true for me" to "Very true for me." Scores will be calculated for each regulatory style to characterize participants' motivational profile toward physical activity.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Self-Perception and Motor Competence (EAPH-A)

    Self-perception will be assessed using the Escala de Autopercepção de Harter para Adolescentes (EAPH-A), the Brazilian adaptation of the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents (SPPA). The instrument comprises five specific domains of self-perception-school competence, social competence, athletic competence, physical appearance, and behavioral conduct-along with a global self-esteem score. The scale uses a structured alternative-response format with four response levels, in which participants first choose which of two hypothetical descriptions best resembles them and then indicate whether the statement is "very true for me" or "somewhat true for me." This response structure reduces social desirability bias and enhances self-reflection.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Social Support for Physical Activity

    Social support for physical activity will be assessed using a 12-item scale that captures different forms of support provided by parents and friends. Considering a typical week, adolescents will report the frequency (never, rarely, often, always) with which parents and friends encourage them, practice together, watch, comment, discuss, invite them to be active, or provide/arrange transportation to physical activity locations. Higher scores reflect greater perceived social support for engaging in physical activity.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Perceived Environment for Physical Activity

    Perception of the environment for physical activity will be assessed using a scale composed of three domains. An overall score will be created by summing the items within each domain. Scores will then be divided into tertiles, with higher tertiles indicating more favorable perceptions of the environment for engaging in physical activity.

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Attitude Toward Physical Activity

    Attitude toward physical activity will be assessed using a five-item semantic differential scale. Two items evaluate affective/emotional aspects and three evaluate instrumental aspects. Participants will rate bipolar adjective pairs (safe-unsafe, fun-boring, important-unimportant, healthy-harmful, good-bad) on a 4-point scale. Higher scores indicate a more positive attitude toward physical activity

    Baseline (single assessment)

  • Self-Efficacy for Physical Activity

    Self-efficacy for physical activity will be measured using a 12-item scale assessing confidence to engage in physical activity when facing commonly reported barriers. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree"). Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy to be physically active.

    Baseline (single assessment)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Stratified network structure by sex

    Baseline

  • Stratified network structure by socioeconomic level

    Baseline

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Maturational Status (Maturity Offset / PHV)

    Baseline (single assessment)

Study Arms (1)

1 - Brazilian Adolescents (10-13 years)

All participants complete the same assessments in two days at a single time point. No arms or exposure groups, as this is an observational study.

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 13 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Brazilian adolescents aged 10 to 13 years, recruited through broad public dissemination as part of a larger intervention project.

You may qualify if:

  • age 10-13 years;
  • medical clearance for physical activity.

You may not qualify if:

  • presence of any clinical diagnosis that may interfere the performance of assessments (including musculoskeletal, neurological, vascular, pulmonary, or cardiac disorders).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

State University Of Rio de Janeiro

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 27.537-000, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Jiang C, Razak NA, Rasyid NM, Cheng H. Investigating the youth physical activity promotion model among Chinese middle school students. BMC Public Health. 2025 May 19;25(1):1843. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23046-y.

    PMID: 40389903BACKGROUND
  • Belanger M, Giroux MA, Registe PPW, Gallant F, Jemaa S, Faivre P, Saucier D, Mekari S. Adolescent physical activity profiles as determinants of emerging adults' physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Mar 25;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01732-9.

    PMID: 40134004BACKGROUND
  • Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26(14):1557-65. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196.

    PMID: 18949660BACKGROUND
  • Vasconcellos F, Seabra A, Cunha F, Montenegro R, Penha J, Bouskela E, Nogueira Neto JF, Collett-Solberg P, Farinatti P. Health markers in obese adolescents improved by a 12-week recreational soccer program: a randomised controlled trial. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(6):564-75. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1064150. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

    PMID: 26208409BACKGROUND
  • Zhao C, Yuan J, Huang WW. Multilevel determinants of physical activity in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis guided by social ecological model. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul 15;17(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01225-z.

    PMID: 40665401BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Central Study Contacts

Isabela F Soares, MSc.

CONTACT

Fabricio V A Vasconcellos, Dr.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
2 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Student and Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2026

First Posted

April 6, 2026

Study Start

April 6, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Last Updated

April 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical restrictions related to research involving minors.

Locations