NCT07510035

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of frailty in hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure. The main questions it aims to answer are:(1) To clarify differences in demographic characteristics and test results (including CGA, BNP, and echocardiography) among different frail populations (2) What demographic, clinical, and geriatric assessment factors are independently associated with frailty in elderly patients with heart failure?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
298

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2026

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 3, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

elderly inpatientsFrail Elderly people hospitalizedheart failureclinical geriatric assessment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Clinical Frail Scale (CFS) score

    The CFS is assessed through clinical judgment based on a patient's functional status, mobility, activity tolerance, comorbidities, and cognitive function in the preceding two weeks. The scale classifies patients into nine levels based on their degree of frailty: 1 - Very Fit, 2 - Well, 3 - Managing Well, 4 - Vulnerable, 5 - Mildly Frail, 6 - Moderately Frail, 7 - Severely Frail, 8 - Very Severely Frail, and 9 - Terminally Ill. The higher the CFS score, the greater the degree of frailty. Excluding those with scores of 8-9, patients with scores of 0-4 are classified into the non-frail group, while those with scores of 5 or higher are classified into the frail group. Frailty Severity Grading Criteria: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score: non-frail (CFS 0-4), moderate frailty (CFS 5-6), and severe frailty (CFS 7).

    Baseline

  • brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)

    Assessed using a blood sample analyzed by an immunoassay. This biomarker reflects ventricular wall stress and is widely used for diagnosing and monitoring heart failure. BNP levels are reported in ng/L. According to clinical guidelines, a BNP \<100 ng/L is considered normal in untreated patients; levels \>400 ng/L are strongly suggestive of heart failure, while values between 100 and 400 ng/L are considered intermediate and should be interpreted in the clinical context. Higher BNP levels indicate greater cardiac stress and correlate with worse outcomes.

    Baseline

  • left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value

    Assessed using echocardiography (transthoracic echocardiography is the standard method), or alternatively by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or nuclear imaging. This imaging parameter quantifies the percentage of blood ejected from the left ventricle during systole and is the primary measure of systolic function. LVEF is reported as a percentage (%). According to clinical guidelines, a normal LVEF is ≥50%; a mildly reduced LVEF is 40-49%; a moderately reduced LVEF is 30-39%; and a severely reduced LVEF is \<30%. Lower LVEF values indicate worse systolic dysfunction and are associated with increased risk of heart failure and adverse outcomes.

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • body mass index (BMI)

    Baseline

  • activities of daily living (ADL) score

    Baseline

  • instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score

    Baseline

  • short physical performance battery (SPPB) score

    Baseline

  • performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA) score

    Baseline

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Non-frail Group

Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from 0 to 4.

Moderate Frailty Group

Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from 5 to 6.

Severe Frailty Group

Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 7

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population consists of hospitalized patients aged ≥60 years with a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure, admitted to the Geriatrics Department of Zhejiang Hospital between January 2023 and December 2023.

You may qualify if:

  • Age≥60 years
  • Patients with complete data(Patients who have completed the comprehensive geriatric assessment,BNP testing, electrocardiogram and echocardiography).
  • Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for heart failure (as defined in the "Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure 2024")

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with incomplete data
  • Patients with severe physical or cognitive impairments that prevent them from completing the assessment.
  • Acute Infections or cerebrovascular diseases
  • Terminal illnesses

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Xiufang Hong

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Yang X, Zhao ZP, Shi Y, Han GY, Xu Y, Li YC, Zhou MG. The evolving burden of heart failure in China: a 34-year subnational analysis of trends and causes from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Mil Med Res. 2025 Oct 9;12(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00650-y.

    PMID: 41068970BACKGROUND
  • Leng X. Concepts and practices of geriatric medicine in the United States[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 2011, 31(1): 31-33.

    BACKGROUND
  • Matsue Y, Kamiya K, Saito H, et al. Current findings and challenges on frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia in older patients with heart failure: insights from the FRAGILE-HF study[J].J Cardiol.2025,86(1):1-9.

    BACKGROUND
  • Denfeld QE, Jha SR, Fung E, Jaarsma T, Maurer MS, Reeves GR, Afilalo J, Beerli N, Bellumkonda L, De Geest S, Gorodeski EZ, Joyce E, Kobashigawa J, Mauthner O, McDonagh J, Uchmanowicz I, Dickson VV, Lindenfeld J, Macdonald P. Assessing and managing frailty in advanced heart failure: An International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Nov 29:S1053-2498(23)02028-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.013. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 38099896BACKGROUND
  • Kitai T, Kohsaka S, Kato T, Kato E, Sato K, Teramoto K, Yaku H, Akiyama E, Ando M, Izumi C, Ide T, Iwasaki YK, Ohno Y, Okumura T, Ozasa N, Kaji S, Kashimura T, Kitaoka H, Kinugasa Y, Kinugawa S, Toda K, Nagai T, Nakamura M, Hikoso S, Minamisawa M, Wakasa S, Anchi Y, Oishi S, Okada A, Obokata M, Kagiyama N, Kato NP, Kohno T, Sato T, Shiraishi Y, Tamaki Y, Tamura Y, Nagao K, Nagatomo Y, Nakamura N, Nochioka K, Nomura A, Nomura S, Horiuchi Y, Mizuno A, Murai R, Inomata T, Kuwahara K, Sakata Y, Tsutsui H, Kinugawa K; Japanese Circulation Society and the Japanese Heart Failure Society Joint Working Group. JCS/JHFS 2025 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure. Circ J. 2025 Jul 25;89(8):1278-1444. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0002. Epub 2025 Jun 25. No abstract available.

    PMID: 40159241BACKGROUND
  • Lai HY, Huang ST, Anker SD, von Haehling S, Akishita M, Arai H, Chen LK, Hsiao FY. The burden of frailty in heart failure: Prevalence, impacts on clinical outcomes and the role of heart failure medications. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Apr;15(2):660-670. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13412. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

    PMID: 38291000BACKGROUND
  • Kaufmann CC, Ahmed A, Harbich PF, Auer L, Propst L, Weltler P, Burger AL, Zweiker D, Geppert A, Huber K, Jager B. Prognostic impact of frailty at admission and in-hospital changes of frailty status in elderly patients with acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Nov;27(11):2501-2511. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3779. Epub 2025 Jul 25.

    PMID: 40711891BACKGROUND
  • Goyal P, Zainul O, Sharma Y, Reich A, Osma P, Lau JD, Massou E, Turchioe M, Russell D, Creber RM, Deaton C. Geriatric Vulnerabilities Among Adults With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cross-Continent Evaluation. JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101602. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101602.

    PMID: 40155186BACKGROUND
  • Galati G, Germanova O, Dacquino G, Bravo FF, Genovese L, Pedretti RFE. Cardiovascular Diseases Epidemiology and Management in the Elderly and very Elderly. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Sep 22:zwaf470. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf470. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 40977495BACKGROUND
  • Maeda D, Fujimoto Y, Nakade T, Abe T, Ishihara S, Jujo K, Matsue Y. Frailty, Sarcopenia, Cachexia, and Malnutrition in Heart Failure. Korean Circ J. 2024 Jul;54(7):363-381. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0089. Epub 2024 Apr 26.

    PMID: 38767446BACKGROUND
  • Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.

    PMID: 11253156BACKGROUND
  • Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physician; Chinese Heart Failure Association of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. [Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2024]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 24;52(3):235-275. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231101-00405. Chinese.

    PMID: 38514328BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Chief Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Posted

April 3, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the primary publication (including baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and analysis data sets) will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, beginning 9 months after article publication and ending 5 years thereafter. Proposals for data use will be reviewed by the study investigators. Requestors will need to sign a data access agreement specifying the intended use of the data, commitment to using it only for the agreed purpose, and agreement not to attempt to re-identify participants.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
De-identified IPD and supporting documents (study protocol, informed consent form) will become available 9 months after the publication of the primary results manuscript and will remain available for 5 years. Access will be provided upon reasonable request to the corresponding author and require a signed data use agreement.
Access Criteria
Access will be granted to qualified researchers (affiliated with academic or healthcare institutions) who provide a methodologically sound research proposal approved by the study investigators. Requestors can access de-identified IPD, study protocol, and informed consent form for the purpose of individual participant data meta-analysis, reproducibility checks, or secondary analysis aligned with the original study ethics. Proposals should be submitted to the corresponding author \[hongxf\ 1101@163.com\] and require a signed Data Access/Use Agreement that includes commitments to: (1) use data only for the specified purpose; (2) protect data confidentiality; (3) not attempt to re-identify participants; and (4) acknowledge the data source in publications.

Locations