Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Frailty in Elderly Patients With Heart Failure
A Cross-Sectional Observational Study:Prevalence and Associated Factors of Frailty in Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Heart Failure
1 other identifier
observational
298
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of frailty in hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure. The main questions it aims to answer are:(1) To clarify differences in demographic characteristics and test results (including CGA, BNP, and echocardiography) among different frail populations (2) What demographic, clinical, and geriatric assessment factors are independently associated with frailty in elderly patients with heart failure?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2026
CompletedApril 8, 2026
April 1, 2026
12 months
March 20, 2026
April 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Clinical Frail Scale (CFS) score
The CFS is assessed through clinical judgment based on a patient's functional status, mobility, activity tolerance, comorbidities, and cognitive function in the preceding two weeks. The scale classifies patients into nine levels based on their degree of frailty: 1 - Very Fit, 2 - Well, 3 - Managing Well, 4 - Vulnerable, 5 - Mildly Frail, 6 - Moderately Frail, 7 - Severely Frail, 8 - Very Severely Frail, and 9 - Terminally Ill. The higher the CFS score, the greater the degree of frailty. Excluding those with scores of 8-9, patients with scores of 0-4 are classified into the non-frail group, while those with scores of 5 or higher are classified into the frail group. Frailty Severity Grading Criteria: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score: non-frail (CFS 0-4), moderate frailty (CFS 5-6), and severe frailty (CFS 7).
Baseline
brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Assessed using a blood sample analyzed by an immunoassay. This biomarker reflects ventricular wall stress and is widely used for diagnosing and monitoring heart failure. BNP levels are reported in ng/L. According to clinical guidelines, a BNP \<100 ng/L is considered normal in untreated patients; levels \>400 ng/L are strongly suggestive of heart failure, while values between 100 and 400 ng/L are considered intermediate and should be interpreted in the clinical context. Higher BNP levels indicate greater cardiac stress and correlate with worse outcomes.
Baseline
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value
Assessed using echocardiography (transthoracic echocardiography is the standard method), or alternatively by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or nuclear imaging. This imaging parameter quantifies the percentage of blood ejected from the left ventricle during systole and is the primary measure of systolic function. LVEF is reported as a percentage (%). According to clinical guidelines, a normal LVEF is ≥50%; a mildly reduced LVEF is 40-49%; a moderately reduced LVEF is 30-39%; and a severely reduced LVEF is \<30%. Lower LVEF values indicate worse systolic dysfunction and are associated with increased risk of heart failure and adverse outcomes.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (9)
body mass index (BMI)
Baseline
activities of daily living (ADL) score
Baseline
instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score
Baseline
short physical performance battery (SPPB) score
Baseline
performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA) score
Baseline
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Non-frail Group
Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from 0 to 4.
Moderate Frailty Group
Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from 5 to 6.
Severe Frailty Group
Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 7
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of hospitalized patients aged ≥60 years with a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure, admitted to the Geriatrics Department of Zhejiang Hospital between January 2023 and December 2023.
You may qualify if:
- Age≥60 years
- Patients with complete data(Patients who have completed the comprehensive geriatric assessment,BNP testing, electrocardiogram and echocardiography).
- Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for heart failure (as defined in the "Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure 2024")
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with incomplete data
- Patients with severe physical or cognitive impairments that prevent them from completing the assessment.
- Acute Infections or cerebrovascular diseases
- Terminal illnesses
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Xiufang Hong
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Related Publications (12)
Yang X, Zhao ZP, Shi Y, Han GY, Xu Y, Li YC, Zhou MG. The evolving burden of heart failure in China: a 34-year subnational analysis of trends and causes from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Mil Med Res. 2025 Oct 9;12(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00650-y.
PMID: 41068970BACKGROUNDLeng X. Concepts and practices of geriatric medicine in the United States[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 2011, 31(1): 31-33.
BACKGROUNDMatsue Y, Kamiya K, Saito H, et al. Current findings and challenges on frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia in older patients with heart failure: insights from the FRAGILE-HF study[J].J Cardiol.2025,86(1):1-9.
BACKGROUNDDenfeld QE, Jha SR, Fung E, Jaarsma T, Maurer MS, Reeves GR, Afilalo J, Beerli N, Bellumkonda L, De Geest S, Gorodeski EZ, Joyce E, Kobashigawa J, Mauthner O, McDonagh J, Uchmanowicz I, Dickson VV, Lindenfeld J, Macdonald P. Assessing and managing frailty in advanced heart failure: An International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Nov 29:S1053-2498(23)02028-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.013. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 38099896BACKGROUNDKitai T, Kohsaka S, Kato T, Kato E, Sato K, Teramoto K, Yaku H, Akiyama E, Ando M, Izumi C, Ide T, Iwasaki YK, Ohno Y, Okumura T, Ozasa N, Kaji S, Kashimura T, Kitaoka H, Kinugasa Y, Kinugawa S, Toda K, Nagai T, Nakamura M, Hikoso S, Minamisawa M, Wakasa S, Anchi Y, Oishi S, Okada A, Obokata M, Kagiyama N, Kato NP, Kohno T, Sato T, Shiraishi Y, Tamaki Y, Tamura Y, Nagao K, Nagatomo Y, Nakamura N, Nochioka K, Nomura A, Nomura S, Horiuchi Y, Mizuno A, Murai R, Inomata T, Kuwahara K, Sakata Y, Tsutsui H, Kinugawa K; Japanese Circulation Society and the Japanese Heart Failure Society Joint Working Group. JCS/JHFS 2025 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure. Circ J. 2025 Jul 25;89(8):1278-1444. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0002. Epub 2025 Jun 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 40159241BACKGROUNDLai HY, Huang ST, Anker SD, von Haehling S, Akishita M, Arai H, Chen LK, Hsiao FY. The burden of frailty in heart failure: Prevalence, impacts on clinical outcomes and the role of heart failure medications. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Apr;15(2):660-670. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13412. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
PMID: 38291000BACKGROUNDKaufmann CC, Ahmed A, Harbich PF, Auer L, Propst L, Weltler P, Burger AL, Zweiker D, Geppert A, Huber K, Jager B. Prognostic impact of frailty at admission and in-hospital changes of frailty status in elderly patients with acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Nov;27(11):2501-2511. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3779. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
PMID: 40711891BACKGROUNDGoyal P, Zainul O, Sharma Y, Reich A, Osma P, Lau JD, Massou E, Turchioe M, Russell D, Creber RM, Deaton C. Geriatric Vulnerabilities Among Adults With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cross-Continent Evaluation. JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101602. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101602.
PMID: 40155186BACKGROUNDGalati G, Germanova O, Dacquino G, Bravo FF, Genovese L, Pedretti RFE. Cardiovascular Diseases Epidemiology and Management in the Elderly and very Elderly. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Sep 22:zwaf470. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf470. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40977495BACKGROUNDMaeda D, Fujimoto Y, Nakade T, Abe T, Ishihara S, Jujo K, Matsue Y. Frailty, Sarcopenia, Cachexia, and Malnutrition in Heart Failure. Korean Circ J. 2024 Jul;54(7):363-381. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0089. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
PMID: 38767446BACKGROUNDFried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PMID: 11253156BACKGROUNDChinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physician; Chinese Heart Failure Association of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. [Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2024]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 24;52(3):235-275. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231101-00405. Chinese.
PMID: 38514328BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2026
First Posted
April 3, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
April 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- De-identified IPD and supporting documents (study protocol, informed consent form) will become available 9 months after the publication of the primary results manuscript and will remain available for 5 years. Access will be provided upon reasonable request to the corresponding author and require a signed data use agreement.
- Access Criteria
- Access will be granted to qualified researchers (affiliated with academic or healthcare institutions) who provide a methodologically sound research proposal approved by the study investigators. Requestors can access de-identified IPD, study protocol, and informed consent form for the purpose of individual participant data meta-analysis, reproducibility checks, or secondary analysis aligned with the original study ethics. Proposals should be submitted to the corresponding author \[hongxf\ 1101@163.com\] and require a signed Data Access/Use Agreement that includes commitments to: (1) use data only for the specified purpose; (2) protect data confidentiality; (3) not attempt to re-identify participants; and (4) acknowledge the data source in publications.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the primary publication (including baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and analysis data sets) will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, beginning 9 months after article publication and ending 5 years thereafter. Proposals for data use will be reviewed by the study investigators. Requestors will need to sign a data access agreement specifying the intended use of the data, commitment to using it only for the agreed purpose, and agreement not to attempt to re-identify participants.