NCT07508137

Brief Summary

This study is a mixed-methods pilot designed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of a brief digital micro-intervention aimed at reducing stigma-related barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) engagement among people who use drugs (PWUD) in Kazakhstan. Participants will complete baseline and post-intervention surveys and receive structured informational content via Telegram or WhatsApp over approximately 2-3 weeks. The intervention focuses on addressing anticipated stigma, confidentiality concerns, and misinformation that may prevent PWUD from seeking PrEP services. No clinical procedures, medication provision, or biological specimen collection are involved.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
16mo left

Started Apr 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress10%
Apr 2026Oct 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2026

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Mean Score Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). It has 4-items scored on a 5-point Likert scale summed to achieve a total score. Total score range of 0-20. Higher scores indicate more acceptability.

    Baseline and Post intervention (Week 4)

  • Mean Score Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale ( 1=Completely Disagree to 5=Completely Agree) used to evaluate the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of an intervention or implementation strategy. Total score range 0-20. Higher scores indicate better appropriateness.

    Baseline and Post intervention (Week 4)

  • Mean Score Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    Feasibility of intervention measured using Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)- a 4-item instrument to assess perceived intervention feasibility. Total score 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater feasibility.

    Baseline and Post intervention (Week 4)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in PrEP knowledge

    Baseline and Post intervention (Week 4)

  • Change in perceived stigma-related barriers

    Baseline and Post intervention (Week 4)

  • Change in readiness to seek PrEP

    Baseline and Post intervention (Week 4)

  • Mean number of clicks or links accessed

    Baseline and Post intervention (Week 4)

  • Mean number of messages delivered

    Baseline and Post intervention (Week 4)

Study Arms (1)

Digital micro-intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive digital micro-intervention modules via Telegram or WhatsApp over approximately 2-3 weeks.

Behavioral: Dgital micro-intervention

Interventions

Intervention will include 6-10 brief modules delivered asynchronously consisting of text-based content with optional simple visuals. There is no requirement for participant response. Messages will avoid explicit labeling referencing HIV or drug use in preview text and be written using neutral language. Participants are allowed to discontinue receipt at any time.

Digital micro-intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Self-reported drug use within the past six months
  • HIV-negative or unknown HIV status (self-reported)
  • Not currently taking PrEP
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Have access to a personal mobile phone capable of receiving Telegram or WhatsApp messages

You may not qualify if:

  • Are unable to provide informed consent
  • Do not have access to a mobile device for digital message delivery
  • Are currently enrolled in another PrEP behavioral intervention study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Center for Scientific and Practical Initiatives

Almaty, Kazakhstan

Location

Study Officials

  • Frederick L Altice, MD

    Yale University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Assel Terlikbayeva, MD, MS, MPH

CONTACT

David Oliveros, MPH

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Adults in Kazakhstan who report recent drug use and who are not currently using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Participants will be recruited through established community-based harm-reduction organizations that serve people who use drugs (PWUD).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2026

First Posted

April 2, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual-level participant data collected during the study may be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request after publication of the study results. Shared data will include de-identified survey data and study documentation, such as the study protocol and data dictionary. Data will be shared in a manner consistent with institutional policies and participant confidentiality protections.

Locations