Innovative Sternal Closure Techniques: Evaluating STRATAFIX™ and DERMABOND™ for Reduced Complications in CABG Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
401
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new method of closing the breastbone after heart bypass surgery can improve healing and reduce complications in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does this new closure method reduce infections and wound reopening? Does it improve healing, recovery, and overall patient outcomes? Researchers will compare patients who receive the new closure method to past patients who received the standard method to see if outcomes are better. Participants will: Receive the new closure method during their surgery (as part of standard care) Be followed during their normal recovery up to their 6-week follow-up visit Complete a short quality-of-life questionnaire (about 10 minutes) Have their recovery assessed, including healing, complications, and hospital use Researchers will also look at quality of life, heart complications, hospital readmissions, antibiotic use, scar appearance, and overall costs to understand the full impact of the new method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2028
April 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.5 years
March 27, 2026
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Sternal Wound Complications (Composite Endpoint)
The primary outcome is a composite measure of treatment success or failure. A participant is considered a success only if they experience none of the following: Deep Sternal Wound Infection (DSWI), Superficial Sternal Wound Infection (SSWI), general Surgical Site Infection (SSI), or Sternal Dehiscence (SD). A participant is considered a failure if any one of these complications occurs. Sternal wound sites will be classified by blinded personnel using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 4-level classification system. Sternal Dehiscence (SD) will be determined via a visual assessment by a cardiac surgeon and recorded as a binary result (yes or no).
6 weeks post-operatively
Study Arms (1)
STRATAFIX™ and DERMABOND™ PRINEO™ Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALThis experimental arm evaluates a dual-component sternal closure strategy in 401 patients undergoing CABG surgery. The intervention replaces traditional non-barbed sutures with a combination of STRATAFIX™ barbed sutures and DERMABOND™ PRINEO™ mesh-based adhesive.
Interventions
This intervention replaces traditional non-barbed, knotted sutures with a specialized knotless and adhesive system. The strategy is characterized by the following layer-specific applications: Deep Tissue (Presternal Fascia): Application of STRATAFIX™ Symmetric barbed sutures. Subcutaneous and Subcuticular Layers: Use of STRATAFIX™ Spiral MONOCRYL™ Plus and/or STRATAFIX™ Spiral PDS™ Plus. These sutures feature an antibacterial triclosan coating designed to reduce the risk of surgical site infections.
Skin Surface: Final closure using the DERMABOND™ PRINEO™ system, which combines 2-octyl cyanoacrylate topical adhesive with a self-adhesive polymer mesh tape.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients aged 18 years and older undergoing CABG surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to participate in the trial.
- Patients who do not read or speak English.
- Patient with allergy to surgical adhesives or sutures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Unity Health Torontolead
- Johnson & Johnsoncollaborator
Related Publications (14)
Krishnamoorthy B, Shepherd N, Critchley WR, Nair J, Devan N, Nasir A, Barnard JB, Venkateswaran RV, Waterworth PD, Fildes JE, Yonan N. A randomized study comparing traditional monofilament knotted sutures with barbed knotless sutures for donor leg wound closure in coronary artery bypass surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;22(2):161-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv314. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
PMID: 26590381BACKGROUNDHaenen, F. W. N., Guy, T. S. & Rodrigus, I. Knotless Closure of the Cardiac Venous Cannulation Site Using Barbed Suture: A First Step in Including Barbed Sutures in our Cardiac Surgery Practice. Surg. Case Rep. 2021, 1-4 (2021).
BACKGROUNDEQ-5D-5L. EuroQol https://euroqol.org/information-and-support/euroqol-instruments/eq-5d5l/.
BACKGROUNDHerman TF, Popowicz P, Bordoni B. Wound Classification. 2023 Aug 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554456/
PMID: 32119343BACKGROUNDLemaignen A, Birgand G, Ghodhbane W, Alkhoder S, Lolom I, Belorgey S, Lescure FX, Armand-Lefevre L, Raffoul R, Dilly MP, Nataf P, Lucet JC. Sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors according to clinical presentation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Jul;21(7):674.e11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
PMID: 25882356BACKGROUNDPastene B, Cassir N, Tankel J, Einav S, Fournier PE, Thomas P, Leone M. Mediastinitis in the intensive care unit patient: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jan;26(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
PMID: 31306791BACKGROUNDHaenen FW, Van Oostende C, Allegaert M, Round KJ, Rosen JL, Guy ST, Rodrigus I. Prosthesis-prosthesis anastomosis using barbed sutures compared to conventional sutures under high, long-term pressure; in vitro extracorporeal circulation setup. Perfusion. 2024 Apr;39(3):571-577. doi: 10.1177/02676591231153539. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
PMID: 36691745BACKGROUNDLin Y, Lai S, Huang J, Du L. The Efficacy and Safety of Knotless Barbed Sutures in the Surgical Field: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 23;6:23425. doi: 10.1038/srep23425.
PMID: 27005688BACKGROUNDGreenberg JA, Goldman RH. Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(3-4):107-15.
PMID: 24920976BACKGROUNDSingh K, Anderson E, Harper JG. Overview and management of sternal wound infection. Semin Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;25(1):25-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275168.
PMID: 22294940BACKGROUNDSong Y, Chu W, Sun J, Liu X, Zhu H, Yu H, Shen C. Review on risk factors, classification, and treatment of sternal wound infection. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 May 19;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02228-y.
PMID: 37208736BACKGROUNDReser D, Caliskan E, Tolboom H, Guidotti A, Maisano F. Median sternotomy. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jul 17;2015:mmv017. doi: 10.1093/mmcts/mmv017. Print 2015.
PMID: 26188337BACKGROUNDCanada, P. H. A. of. Heart Disease in Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/publichealth/services/publications/diseases-conditions/heart-disease-canada.html (2017).
BACKGROUNDRoth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, Barengo NC, Beaton AZ, Benjamin EJ, Benziger CP, Bonny A, Brauer M, Brodmann M, Cahill TJ, Carapetis J, Catapano AL, Chugh SS, Cooper LT, Coresh J, Criqui M, DeCleene N, Eagle KA, Emmons-Bell S, Feigin VL, Fernandez-Sola J, Fowkes G, Gakidou E, Grundy SM, He FJ, Howard G, Hu F, Inker L, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Koroshetz W, Lavie C, Lloyd-Jones D, Lu HS, Mirijello A, Temesgen AM, Mokdad A, Moran AE, Muntner P, Narula J, Neal B, Ntsekhe M, Moraes de Oliveira G, Otto C, Owolabi M, Pratt M, Rajagopalan S, Reitsma M, Ribeiro ALP, Rigotti N, Rodgers A, Sable C, Shakil S, Sliwa-Hahnle K, Stark B, Sundstrom J, Timpel P, Tleyjeh IM, Valgimigli M, Vos T, Whelton PK, Yacoub M, Zuhlke L, Murray C, Fuster V; GBD-NHLBI-JACC Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Writing Group. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982-3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.
PMID: 33309175BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- All personnel involved in data collection and the grading of sternal wound sites will be blinded to the treatment parameters to reduce bias.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2026
First Posted
April 2, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03