Adductor Canal Block Methods in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
Comparison of Surgeon-Performed Intraoperative Adductor Canal Block and Ultrasound-Guided Anesthesiologist-Performed Block in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
48
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of surgeon-performed intraoperative adductor canal block (ACB) and ultrasound-guided anesthesiologist-performed ACB in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In a prospective, randomized paired design, each patient will receive surgeon-performed ACB on one knee and anesthesiologist-performed ACB on the contralateral knee. The primary outcome is postoperative pain measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the study is designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of surgeon-performed ACB. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, time to first ambulation, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Additionally, postoperative ultrasound evaluation will be performed to assess the distribution pattern of local anesthetic within the adductor canal, including cross-sectional area and longitudinal spread. This study is expected to provide evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness and technical accuracy of surgeon-performed ACB in comparison with the conventional ultrasound-guided technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started May 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2029
April 1, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.7 years
March 26, 2026
March 26, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain (Numeric Rating Scale)
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10). Pain scores will be recorded at predefined time points under resting conditions. The primary analysis will evaluate the non-inferiority of surgeon-performed adductor canal block compared to ultrasound-guided adductor canal block.
Baseline, postoperative day 0 (afternoon), postoperative day 1 (morning and afternoon), and postoperative day 2 (morning)
Study Arms (2)
Surgeon-Performed Adductor Canal Block
EXPERIMENTALAdductor canal block performed intraoperatively by the surgeon using an anatomical landmark-based technique. The injection is administered during surgery without ultrasound guidance using a standardized approach and the same type and volume of local anesthetic as the comparator.
Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdductor canal block performed by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance using real-time imaging. The same concentration and volume of local anesthetic are administered using a standardized ultrasound-guided technique.
Interventions
An adductor canal block performed intraoperatively by the surgeon using an anatomical landmark-based technique. The injection is administered at approximately 8 cm proximal to the distal femur, with the needle directed medially and posteriorly. A total of 20 mL of 0.3% ropivacaine mixed with epinephrine is injected using a standardized approach without ultrasound guidance.
An adductor canal block performed by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. The saphenous nerve and femoral artery within the adductor canal are identified using real-time imaging, and 20 mL of 0.3% ropivacaine mixed with epinephrine is injected using an in-plane technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 19 years or older
- Patients scheduled for bilateral total knee arthroplasty
- Patients who provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent
- Neurological or psychiatric conditions affecting cooperation (e.g., dementia, delirium)
- Pre-existing neurological or anatomical abnormalities of the lower extremities
- Chronic opioid use or opioid dependence
- Coagulation disorders or contraindications to nerve block
- Pregnancy
- Cases in which ultrasound evaluation is technically not feasible
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2026
First Posted
April 1, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2029
Last Updated
April 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share