Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment of Endosseous Lesions
AIpreop
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Despite these advances, CBCT interpretation remains largely qualitative and dependent on the clinician's experience. Conventional evaluation is based on two-dimensional slices and linear measurements, which may underestimate lesion complexity and spatial distribution. Recent developments in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine have introduced automated image segmentation tools capable of identifying lesion boundaries and calculating volumetric data. These technologies allow a transition from subjective assessment to objective, reproducible quantification. The potential clinical advantages include:
- Objective measurement of lesion size (volume in mm³)
- Improved surgical planning
- Enhanced prediction of anatomical involvement
- Reduction of diagnostic errors
- Standardization of follow-up and outcome assessment Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of AI-based segmentation and volumetric analysis of endosseous lesions compared to conventional CBCT interpretation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedApril 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
1 month
March 21, 2026
April 12, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time required for CBCT interpretation (minutes)
assessment of the time required for CBCT interpretation by the surgeon. A digital stopwatch was used to record the operative time required for each procedural step, with measurements expressed in seconds, in order to obtain an objective and standardized assessment of execution time.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Patients with endosseous lesion-Analyzed using conventional CBCT
NO INTERVENTIONPatients with endosseous lesion- AI-assisted evaluation
EXPERIMENTAL* Automated segmentation of the lesion * 3D reconstruction * Volumetric calculation
Interventions
CBCT scans were processed using AI-based software capable of: * Automated segmentation of the lesion * 3D reconstruction * Volumetric calculation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Good health according to the System of the American Society of Anesthesiology
- Aged older than 18 years
- No general medical contraindication for surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Smoking more than 15 cigarettes a day
- Pregnancy
- Acute infections
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Bari Aldo Moro
Bari, 70021, Italy
Dr. Giuseppe D'Albis
Bari, 70124, Italy
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe D'Albis, Dr
University of Bari Aldo Moro
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Saverio Capodiferro, Prof
University of Bari Aldo Moro
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2026
First Posted
April 1, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04