NCT07496151

Brief Summary

Cerebral palsy is one of the most common causes of physical disability in childhood and is often associated with impaired trunk control, reduced upper limb strength, and limitations in functional mobility and daily activities. Trunk control is essential for postural stability and directly influences upper limb function and the ability to perform goal-directed tasks. Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT/Bobath) and functional physiotherapy are widely used approaches in pediatric neurorehabilitation. NDT/Bobath focuses on facilitating postural control and promoting efficient movement patterns, while functional physiotherapy emphasizes task-specific training and the improvement of motor performance through meaningful activities. However, evidence comparing the effectiveness of these approaches on trunk control and upper arm strength remains limited. This study aims to investigate and compare the effectiveness of Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT/Bobath) and functional physiotherapy on upper arm strength and trunk control in children with cerebral palsy. Participants will be allocated to different intervention groups, with each group receiving one of the two therapeutic approaches. Additionally, wearable Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) will be used to provide objective and quantitative assessment of trunk movement under both static (sitting) and dynamic (functional movement) conditions. We hypothesize that both intervention groups will demonstrate improvements in trunk control and upper arm strength, with potential differences in the magnitude of improvement between the two approaches. Furthermore, IMU-based measurements are expected to detect subtle changes in movement quality that may not be captured by traditional clinical assessment tools. The findings of this study may contribute to a better understanding of the comparative effectiveness of commonly used therapeutic approaches and support evidence-based decision-making in pediatric rehabilitation.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress15%
Apr 2026Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2026

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2026

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 21, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from Baseline in trunk control during Static Sitting and Static Standing at 12 Weeks using IMU's sensors

    Trunk kinematic data will be collected using Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors placed on T2-T4, L1 and S1. The measure evaluates the range of trunk sway (in degrees) during a standardized quiet sitting and static standing test for 30 seconds. A decrease in trunk sway range indicates improved postural stability and better trunk control.

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • Change from Baseline in Handgrip Strength at 12 Weeks

    Handgrip strength will be measured in kilograms (kg) using the Kinvent K-Grip digital dynamometer. Participants perform two maximal isometric contractions, and the peak force is recorded.

    Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change from Baseline in Upper Limb Muscle Strength (Push) at 12 Weeks

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • Change from Baseline in Sitting Assessment Scale (SAS) Score at 12 Weeks

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • Change from Baseline in Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) Score at 12 Weeks

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • Change from Baseline in Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) Score at 12 Weeks

    Baseline and 12 weeks

  • Change from Baseline in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Time at 12 Weeks

    Baseline and 12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Bobath Therapy Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will receive physical therapy based on the Neurodevelopmental Treatment (Bobath) approach. The sessions will focus on motor control, postural alignment, and facilitation of normal movement patterns. Treatment will be tailored to individual needs and performed by a certified therapist.

Other: Neurodevelopmental Treatment

Functional Physiotherapy Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Functional Physiotherapy

Interventions

The intervention consists of Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT/Bobath) focused on optimizing sensorimotor function through task-specific training and therapeutic handling. The approach emphasizes the inhibition of abnormal reflex patterns and the facilitation of normal postural control and voluntary movement. Dosage/Intensity: Sessions will last 60' Frequency: Participants will receive treatment 2 times a week Total Duration: The intervention period will span 12 weeks

Also known as: Bobath, NDT
Bobath Therapy Group

The intervention focuses on Functional Physiotherapy (FP), a task-oriented approach aimed at improving the performance of specific daily activities. Unlike neurofacilitation techniques, FP emphasizes repetitive practice of functional tasks in a real-world context. Dosage/Intensity: Sessions will last 60' Frequency: Participants will receive treatment 2 times a week Total Duration: The intervention period will span 12 weeks

Also known as: FP, Task-Specific Training
Functional Physiotherapy Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 4-12 years
  • Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy
  • Ability to understand simple commands (cooperative child)
  • Classification in GMFCS (Levels I-IV)
  • Physical therapy interventions in Pediatric Physiotherapy Laboratories throughout Greece
  • Signed parental consent within one week of notification

You may not qualify if:

  • Botulinum toxin (Botox) injection within the last 3 months
  • Selective dorsal rhizotomy within the last 1 year
  • Uncontrolled epilepsy
  • Co-existing pathologies affecting the trunk and functionality
  • Age outside the range of 4-12 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Christina Vassou

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Candidate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2026

First Posted

March 27, 2026

Study Start

April 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04