Efficacy of Different Interventions for Progressive Myopia After Orthokeratology Lens Wear
A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Different Interventions for Progressive Myopia in Children After Orthokeratology Lens Wear
1 other identifier
observational
3,890
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Myopia has emerged as a significant concern impacting the visual health of children and adolescents on a global scale. According to research conducted by Holden BA et al., it is projected that by the year 2050, the worldwide prevalence of myopia and high myopia will experience a substantial increase, affecting approximately 5 billion and 1 billion individuals, respectively, with particularly high prevalence rates observed in East Asia\[1\]. The persistent rise in myopia incidence, coupled with the escalation of complications associated with high myopia, is anticipated to exert complex socio-economic repercussions \[2\]. Consequently, the prevention of myopia onset and the management of axial length elongation have become critically important \[3\]. Orthokeratology (Ortho-K) is a procedure that involves the overnight application of specially designed reverse geometry rigid gas permeable contact lenses to achieve temporary corneal reshaping and reduce myopia during the day\[4,5\]. In children with mild to moderate myopia, Ortho-K has demonstrated visual correction efficacy ranging from 80% to 92%\[6,7\]. Nonetheless, its efficacy in controlling myopia progression may not match its corrective efficacy. The therapeutic effect of Ortho-K in decelerating axial elongation is reported to range from 43% to 63%. Despite the use of Ortho-K, approximately 15% of children continue to exhibit rapid axial elongation exceeding 0.36 mm per year.\[8,9\]. In recent years, adjunctive interventions such as low-concentration atropine eye drops, modification of the back optical zone diameter (BOZD) of orthokeratology (Ortho-K) lenses, and low-level red-light therapy (RLRL) have been proposed to augment the myopia control efficacy of Ortho-K. Zhao et al. \[10\] reported that after one year of treatment with either atropine orthokeratology (AOK) or Ortho-K lenses in children aged 5-14 years, the axial length (AL) increased by 0.14 mm and 0.29 mm, respectively. Another study involving children aged 8-12 years \[11\] demonstrated that after one year of treatment, the AOK group exhibited a 17% reduction in AL growth (0.20 mm vs. 0.24 mm). Research conducted by Xiong et al. \[12\] indicated that for children whose eyes elongated by at least 0.50 mm within one year of Ortho-K wear, the combination of RLRL therapy with Ortho-K significantly reduced axial elongation compared to Ortho-K alone. Additional studies have suggested that decreasing the BOZD can enhance the extent and degree of mid-peripheral corneal steepening, thereby decelerating axial elongation \[13-15\]. Most existing studies primarily compare a single intervention against a control group, thereby lacking direct "head-to-head" comparisons. Traditional meta-analyses are limited to comparing two interventions at a time and often fail to assess multiple treatments concurrently. Consequently, most meta-analyses offer only statistical insights into the efficacy of individual interventions. Clinically, it is common to combine two or more interventions to treat myopia, particularly in cases of rapidly progressive myopia. Previous research has indicated that combined interventions may have additive effects in the prevention and control of myopia; however, these findings require further empirical validation. This study employs a retrospective approach to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment strategies in managing axial elongation in children aged 8-12 years who experience rapid axial progression following Ortho-K lens wear. The objective is to provide a scientific foundation for the development of personalized myopia control plans.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2027
ExpectedApril 1, 2026
March 1, 2026
1 month
March 20, 2026
March 26, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Axial Length from Baseline at 12 Months
Axial length is measured by IOL-Master 700, and the change value is calculated by comparing with the baseline value before intervention.
12 Months
Change in Axial Length from Baseline at 12 Months
Axial length is measured by IOL-Master 700, and the change value is calculated by comparing with the baseline value before intervention. This is the primary efficacy endpoint to evaluate the myopia control effect of different interventions.
12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Axial Length from Baseline at 6 Months
6 Months
Incidence of Adverse Events
12 Months
Study Arms (4)
OK Lens Continuation Group
Continue wearing original orthokeratology lenses with unchanged parameters, follow-up every 6 months.
OK Lens + 0.01% Atropine Group
Continue OK lenses + 0.01% atropine sulfate eye drops once daily at bedtime.
OK Lens with Reduced Optical Zone Group
Wear OK lenses with reduced optical zone diameter (adjusted by 0.5mm from original parameters).
OK Lens + Low-Intensity Red Light Group
Continue OK lenses + low-intensity red light therapy (630nm, 6 minutes daily).
Interventions
Continue wearing original orthokeratology lenses with unchanged parameters, follow-up every 6 months.
Continue OK lenses + 0.01% atropine sulfate eye drops once daily at bedtime.
Wear OK lenses with reduced optical zone diameter (adjusted by 0.5mm from original parameters).
Continue OK lenses + low-intensity red light therapy (630nm, 6 minutes daily).
Eligibility Criteria
Children aged 8-12 years with myopia who have worn orthokeratology (OK) lenses for at least 1 year, with axial length elongation \>0.3mm in the past 12 months, indicating progressive myopia despite OK lens wear. Both male and female participants are eligible, with no gender restriction.
You may qualify if:
- \) The initial fitting age is between 8-12 years, irrespective of gender; 2) The spherical equivalent refraction (SE) of both eyes at the initial fitting falls within the manufacturer's approved range of -6.00D to -0.50D; 3) The best corrected visual acuity of both eyes is ≥1.0 (Snellen); 4) The ability to ensure overnight Ortho-K lens wear for a duration of 8 to 10 hours; 5) No prior history of ocular trauma or surgery; 6) No prior history of acute or chronic ocular inflammation, such as keratoconjunctivitis or abnormal tear film; 7) The ability to meticulously adhere to instructions for lens care and attend regular follow-up examinations; 8) The standard use of other myopia progression interventions, such as 0.01% atropine or red-light therapy as prescribed; 9) Comprehensive follow-up data; 10) At least one eye exhibits an annual axial length elongation of \>0.30 mm during the first year of Ortho-K lens wear.
You may not qualify if:
- \) Axial length elongation less than 0.30 mm in both eyes during the first year of Ortho-K treatment; 2) Incidence of significant complications during the study period, such as recurrent corneal inflammation; 3) Incomplete data or cases lost to follow-up; 4) SE of either eye less than -6.00D, or astigmatism greater than -2.00D; 5) Unstable vision during Ortho-K treatment, characterized by multiple instances of vision below 0.2 (LogMAR); 6) Change in the brand of Ortho-K lens.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Ophthalmology, Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2026
First Posted
March 27, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share