NCT07494422

Brief Summary

Globally, studies indicated that 16% of community dwelling older adults have been exposed to some form of abuse in the past 12 months. Furthermore, a global meta-analysis about AOP in long-term care facilities used staff as respondents and found that the pooled estimate of overall self-reported perpetration of staff to resident abuse during the past 12 months was 64.2% (95% CI 53.3-73.9%). Similar findings was also reported in a study from Norway in which the overall prevalence of observed staff-to-resident abuse was 76% and 60% of respondents report self-perpetration of abusive acts during the past 12 months. Resident-to-resident aggression was even more common, observed by 88% of respondents. This study is part of the Swedish national research program APPEAL (A Path to Prevention of Elder Abuse in Long-term care) with the long-term goal to co-create an intervention for abuse of older people (AOP) in nursing homes together with stakeholders, i.e., staff, managers, care recipients and relatives. Study design and data collection: A cross-sectional study design will be used with slightly different data collection modes.

  1. 1.Population sample. Statistics Sweden combine data from the Swedish Occupational Register with data about industry codes (SNI-codes) to make a national randomized sample of staff working in home care services (n=12000) and nursing homes (n=11000) in Sweden. Data will be collected through a digital survey. Data will be combined with available register data from Statistics Sweden, including for example sex, age, civil state and occupational related data.
  2. 2.Workplace sample. Sweden has 290 Municipalities. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) have an official categorization of the municipalities based on e.g., urban area size, proximity to a larger urban area, and commuting patterns. One municipality in each of the nine categories has been randomly selected for participation. In the randomization process, geographical location of the municipalities has been considered to assure national representativeness, meaning that in case several municipalities in the same geographical region were selected a new randomization was conducted. Staff in each selected municipalities will be invited to participate through managers in each organization. Data will be collected through a digital questionnaire. Organizations will be encouraged to set a side time at a staff meeting for completing the questionnaire. If this is not possible, a link to the questionnaire will be sent out by e-mail. Data will be collected anonymously.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
9mo left

Started Mar 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress33%
Mar 2026Apr 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 24, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2026

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Abuse of older peopleLong-term care facilitiesHome careHome health care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Self-reported perpetration of abuse

    Proportion of staff reporting perpetration of abuse of older people during the past 12 monts

    Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about abuse. The timeframe used in the questionnaire is experiences of abuse during the past 12 months.

  • Staff-to-resident abuse

    Proportion of staff reporting witnessing abuse of older people by another staff member during the past 12 monts

    Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.

  • Relative-to-resident abuse

    Proportion of staff reporting witnessing abuse by a relative during the past 12 months

    Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.

  • Resident-to-resident aggression

    Proportion of staff reporting witnessing resident-to-resident abusive behaviours in the past 12 months

    Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Staff exposure to abuse

    Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about expsoure to abuse at the workplace during the past 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Random sample

Random sample of staff working in home care services or long-term care facilities according to national registers

Workplace sample

Staff working in home care services and long-term care facilities in a selected number of municiaplities who accepted participation in the study

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 69 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Two samples are used. 1. Population sample. Statistics Sweden combine data from the Swedish Occupational Register with data about industry codes (SNI-codes) to make a national randomized sample of staff working in home care services (n=12000) and nursing homes (n=11000) in Sweden. 2. Workplace sample. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) have an official categorization of the 290 municipalities in Sweden based on e.g., urban area size, proximity to a larger urban area, and commuting patterns. One municipality in each of the nine categories has been randomly selected for participation. Staff in each selected municipalities will be invited to participate through managers in each organization.

You may qualify if:

  • Working in home care services or a long-term care facility in Sweden
  • Working in direct contact with older adults (e.g., providing care, nursing, rehabilitation to older adults)

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Linköping University

Linköping, Sweden

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sexual BehaviorBehavior

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Posted

March 27, 2026

Study Start

March 24, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

We plan to share IPD upon reasonable request and as appropriate according to rules and regulations in Sweden.

Access Criteria
Data will be shared upon reasonable request by contacting the principal investigator.

Locations