NCT07494383

Brief Summary

This pilot randomised controlled trial compared sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) using intranasal 2% lidocaine versus conservative management (bed rest and aggressive hydration) in patients who developed post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following accidental dural puncture with 17G Tuohy needles during epidural procedures. The primary outcomes were feasibility metrics (recruitment, retention, and protocol adherence). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 0-10) at 30 minutes, 12 hours, and 24 hours post-intervention; rescue analgesia requirements; mobilisation time; and adverse events.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 29, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 24, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 28, 2024

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 15, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

26 days

First QC Date

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Post-dural puncture headacheSphenopalatine ganglion blockPDPHSPGBPilot studyRandomised controlled trialRegional anaesthesiaNeuraxial anaesthesiaLidocaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Feasibility: recruitment rate

    Proportion of eligible patients who were successfully recruited and randomised to meet the pre-specified pilot sample size target of 26 participants.

    At study completion (enrolment period)

  • Feasibility: retention rate

    Proportion of randomised participants who completed all follow-up assessments through 24 hours, expressed as a percentage with 95% confidence interval.

    At 24 hours post-intervention (T3)

  • Feasibility: protocol adherence

    Proportion of participants in each group who received their allocated intervention in full accordance with the study protocol, expressed as a percentage with 95% confidence interval.

    Throughout the 24-hour observation period

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain intensity by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Immediately post-intervention (T0), at 30 minutes (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) post-intervention

  • Rescue analgesia requirement

    At 30 minutes (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) post-intervention

  • Time to mobilisation

    At 30 minutes (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) post-intervention

  • Adverse events

    Throughout the 24-hour observation period

Study Arms (2)

SPGB

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion block using cotton-tipped applicators saturated with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine, inserted at 45° to the hard palate and advanced along the superior border of the middle turbinate to the posterior nasopharyngeal wall, remaining in place for 15-20 minutes before removal.

Procedure: Sphenopalatine ganglion block

CON

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received conservative management comprising strict bed rest (supine then prone positioning) with bathroom privileges at bedside only, and aggressive hydration (IV 0.9% saline at 125 mL/hr plus a minimum of 3L oral fluids per 24 hours).

Other: Conservative management

Interventions

Bilateral transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block using cotton-tipped applicators saturated with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine (total 4 mL), applied for 15-20 minutes. Patient positioned supine with slight cervical extension during the procedure.

SPGB

Strict bed rest (supine then prone positioning) with bathroom privileges at bedside only, combined with aggressive intravenous and oral hydration (IV 0.9% saline at 125 mL/hr plus a minimum of 3L oral fluids per 24 hours).

CON

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-55 years
  • ASA physical status I or II
  • Developed post-dural puncture headache following accidental dural puncture with a 17G Tuohy needle during an epidural procedure
  • Enrolled within 24 hours of dural puncture
  • PDPH diagnosed clinically as headache with postural characteristics (worsening upright, relief supine), consistent with ICHD criteria
  • Willing to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • History of migraine or chronic headache
  • Received prior intervention for PDPH before enrolment
  • Chronic use of anticonvulsants, gabapentinoids, or weak opioids
  • Elimination Criteria:
  • Patient withdrawal of consent at any point during the study
  • Development of side effects requiring further interventional management

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Regional "General Ignacio Zaragoza," ISSSTE

Mexico City, Mexico City, 09360, Mexico

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Post-Dural Puncture HeadacheHeadache

Interventions

Sphenopalatine Ganglion BlockConservative Treatment

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Headache Disorders, SecondaryHeadache DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Autonomic Nerve BlockNerve BlockAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaDenervationNeurosurgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeTherapeutics

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This was a single-blind trial. Blinding of patients and treating clinicians was not feasible given the nature of the interventions. The outcome assessor collecting NRS pain scores was instructed to remain blinded to group allocation and was not involved in treatment delivery.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two-arm parallel-group pilot RCT. Participants were randomised equally (n=13 per group) to receive sphenopalatine ganglion block with 2% lidocaine or conservative management (bed rest and aggressive hydration).
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, Head and Coordinator of Anesthesiology Graduate Program, Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Posted

March 27, 2026

Study Start

May 29, 2024

Primary Completion

June 24, 2024

Study Completion

June 28, 2024

Last Updated

May 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this article, along with the full analysis code, will be made available following article publication via the corresponding author's public GitHub repository (https://github.com/phabel-LD).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning at the time of article publication, with no end date.
Access Criteria
Data and code will be publicly available with no access restrictions via GitHub.
More information

Locations