Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Post-Dural Puncture Headache
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot randomised controlled trial compared sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) using intranasal 2% lidocaine versus conservative management (bed rest and aggressive hydration) in patients who developed post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following accidental dural puncture with 17G Tuohy needles during epidural procedures. The primary outcomes were feasibility metrics (recruitment, retention, and protocol adherence). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 0-10) at 30 minutes, 12 hours, and 24 hours post-intervention; rescue analgesia requirements; mobilisation time; and adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2026
CompletedMay 15, 2026
March 1, 2026
26 days
March 20, 2026
May 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Feasibility: recruitment rate
Proportion of eligible patients who were successfully recruited and randomised to meet the pre-specified pilot sample size target of 26 participants.
At study completion (enrolment period)
Feasibility: retention rate
Proportion of randomised participants who completed all follow-up assessments through 24 hours, expressed as a percentage with 95% confidence interval.
At 24 hours post-intervention (T3)
Feasibility: protocol adherence
Proportion of participants in each group who received their allocated intervention in full accordance with the study protocol, expressed as a percentage with 95% confidence interval.
Throughout the 24-hour observation period
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain intensity by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Immediately post-intervention (T0), at 30 minutes (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) post-intervention
Rescue analgesia requirement
At 30 minutes (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) post-intervention
Time to mobilisation
At 30 minutes (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) post-intervention
Adverse events
Throughout the 24-hour observation period
Study Arms (2)
SPGB
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion block using cotton-tipped applicators saturated with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine, inserted at 45° to the hard palate and advanced along the superior border of the middle turbinate to the posterior nasopharyngeal wall, remaining in place for 15-20 minutes before removal.
CON
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received conservative management comprising strict bed rest (supine then prone positioning) with bathroom privileges at bedside only, and aggressive hydration (IV 0.9% saline at 125 mL/hr plus a minimum of 3L oral fluids per 24 hours).
Interventions
Bilateral transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block using cotton-tipped applicators saturated with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine (total 4 mL), applied for 15-20 minutes. Patient positioned supine with slight cervical extension during the procedure.
Strict bed rest (supine then prone positioning) with bathroom privileges at bedside only, combined with aggressive intravenous and oral hydration (IV 0.9% saline at 125 mL/hr plus a minimum of 3L oral fluids per 24 hours).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-55 years
- ASA physical status I or II
- Developed post-dural puncture headache following accidental dural puncture with a 17G Tuohy needle during an epidural procedure
- Enrolled within 24 hours of dural puncture
- PDPH diagnosed clinically as headache with postural characteristics (worsening upright, relief supine), consistent with ICHD criteria
- Willing to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- History of migraine or chronic headache
- Received prior intervention for PDPH before enrolment
- Chronic use of anticonvulsants, gabapentinoids, or weak opioids
- Elimination Criteria:
- Patient withdrawal of consent at any point during the study
- Development of side effects requiring further interventional management
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Regional "General Ignacio Zaragoza," ISSSTE
Mexico City, Mexico City, 09360, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This was a single-blind trial. Blinding of patients and treating clinicians was not feasible given the nature of the interventions. The outcome assessor collecting NRS pain scores was instructed to remain blinded to group allocation and was not involved in treatment delivery.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Head and Coordinator of Anesthesiology Graduate Program, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2026
First Posted
March 27, 2026
Study Start
May 29, 2024
Primary Completion
June 24, 2024
Study Completion
June 28, 2024
Last Updated
May 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Beginning at the time of article publication, with no end date.
- Access Criteria
- Data and code will be publicly available with no access restrictions via GitHub.
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this article, along with the full analysis code, will be made available following article publication via the corresponding author's public GitHub repository (https://github.com/phabel-LD).