The Effect of Peer Video Modeling and 3D Jaw Video Modeling Training on Oral Health and Toothbrushing Skills in Children With Autism
RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was conducted to improve the oral hygiene habits of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and to compare the effects of peer video modeling and three-dimensional (3D) jaw model simulation methods. The research was carried out at Istanbul Hamit Ibrahimiye Special Education Practice School with a randomized controlled experimental design, involving 120 children aged 6-12 years. The participants were divided into three groups: peer video modeling, 3D jaw model simulation, and control. Data collection tools included a sociodemographic information form, oral and dental health knowledge form, plaque index, gingival index and tooth brushing evaluation forms. The study was evaluated based on assessments conducted at baseline, 1st month, 3rd month, and 6th month. The findings of the study revealed that the peer video modeling method significantly reduced the plaque index (p \< 0.05) and led to a notable improvement in tooth brushing skills. The improvement observed in the 3D jaw model simulation group was more limited. In terms of long-term effects, peer video modeling was found to have a lasting impact on children's oral hygiene habits (p \< 0.01). These results indicate that peer video modeling is particularly more effective in promoting tooth brushing habits among children with ASD. In conclusion, peer video modeling appears to be a more effective method for oral and dental health education in children with ASD. Future studies should examine its long-term effects in more detail across different age groups. In addition, developing guideline materials for parents and educators may be beneficial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2026
CompletedMarch 25, 2026
March 1, 2026
3.8 years
March 16, 2026
March 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Modified silness-löe plaque ındex (mPLI)
Dental plaque accumulation was assessed using the Modified Silness-Löe Plaque Index (mPLI), a widely used tool for evaluating plaque presence on tooth surfaces, particularly suitable for pediatric and special needs populations. In accordance with the FDI tooth numbering system and expert consultation, six index teeth (3 buccal, 8 buccal, 14 buccal, 19 lingual, 24 buccal, and 30 lingual) were selected. Both buccal and lingual surfaces were examined. Each surface was scored on a 4-point scale (0 = no plaque; 1 = plaque detectable by probe; 2 = visible plaque; 3 = abundant plaque). The individual plaque score was calculated by dividing the total score by the number of surfaces examined. Scores were categorized as no (\<0.1), mild (0.1-1.0), moderate (1.1-2.0), or severe (2.1-3.0) plaque accumulation.
Baseline, 1.,3., and 6. months
Gingival Index (GI)
Gingival health was assessed using the Silness-Löe Gingival Index, a validated tool used to evaluate gingival inflammation and overall periodontal health. Gingival inflammation was measured by gently probing four gingival surfaces of each selected tooth with a WHO periodontal probe, applying a force not exceeding 20 g. Each surface was scored on a 4-point scale (0-3). The individual gingival index score was calculated by dividing the total score by the number of surfaces examined. Scores were classified as no (\<0.1), mild (0.1-1.0), moderate (1.1-2.0), or severe (2.1-3.0) inflammation.
Baseline, 1., 3., and 6. months
Toothbrushing assessment form
Toothbrushing performance was assessed using a structured 14-step protocol designed to evaluate toothbrushing skills and independence in oral hygiene practices, based on national guidelines and relevant literature. Each step was scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not completed, 1 = completed with caregiver assistance, 2 = completed with verbal guidance, 3 = completed independently). The overall score was calculated by dividing the total score by 14. The protocol includes essential brushing steps, such as cleaning anterior teeth and right and left posterior teeth in both jaws. This tool enables the systematic assessment of brushing accuracy, skill acquisition, and level of independence in children.
Baseline, 1., 3., and 6.months
Study Arms (3)
Peer video modeling
EXPERIMENTALAfter obtaining written parental consent and demographic data, the study protocol is implemented. Oral examinations are conducted in the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist, under the researcher's supervision, using disposable materials. The number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are recorded. Children and their parents then watch a 14-step toothbrushing instructional video in a separate classroom, in which a healthy 12-year-old boy demonstrates proper brushing behaviors with verbal instructions. Following the video, children practice brushing using a mirror and materials provided by the researcher. Performance is assessed using a 14-step tool scored from 0 to 3, and parents receive individualized feedback. For the peer video modeling group, a WhatsApp group is created, and parents are instructed to show the video daily before brushing. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using plaque and gingival indices.
3D video modeling
EXPERIMENTALAfter obtaining written parental consent and demographic data, the study protocol is implemented. Oral examinations are conducted in the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist under researcher supervision using disposable materials. The number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are recorded. Children and their parents then watch a 14-step toothbrushing instructional video in a separate classroom, in which a 3D jaw model demonstrates proper brushing behaviors with verbal instructions. Following the video, children practice brushing using a mirror and materials provided by the researcher. Performance is assessed using a 14-step tool scored from 0 to 3, and parents receive individualized feedback. For the peer video modeling group, a WhatsApp group is created, and parents are instructed to show the video daily before brushing. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using plaque and gingival indices.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONAfter obtaining written parental consent and demographic information, the study protocol is initiated. Oral examinations are conducted at the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist under researcher supervision using disposable materials. During the examination, the number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are systematically recorded. Children in the control group receive no intervention during the study period. Oral health assessments, including plaque index, gingival health, and toothbrushing performance, are conducted at predetermined time points (baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months). At the end of the six-month study, children and their parents who have not received prior training are provided with toothbrushing education. The researcher demonstrates proper brushing techniques using a 3D jaw model in the school conference hall, and a peer video modeling material is sent to parents via e-mail or WhatsApp.
Interventions
After obtaining written parental consent and demographic data, the study protocol is implemented. Oral examinations are conducted in the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist, under the researcher's supervision, using disposable materials. The number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are recorded. Children and their parents then watch a 14-step toothbrushing instructional video in a separate classroom, in which a healthy 12-year-old boy demonstrates proper brushing behaviors with verbal instructions. Following the video, children practice brushing using a mirror and materials provided by the researcher. Performance is assessed using a 14-step tool scored from 0 to 3, and parents receive individualized feedback. For the peer video modeling group, a WhatsApp group is created, and parents are instructed to show the video daily before brushing. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using plaque and gingival indices.
After obtaining written parental consent and demographic data, the study protocol is implemented. Oral examinations are conducted in the school infirmary by a pediatric dentist under researcher supervision using disposable materials. The number of teeth, caries and fillings, plaque index scores, and gingival health are recorded. Children and their parents then watch a 14-step toothbrushing instructional video in a separate classroom, in which a 3D jaw model demonstrates proper brushing behaviors with verbal instructions. Following the video, children practice brushing using a mirror and materials provided by the researcher. Performance is assessed using a 14-step tool scored from 0 to 3, and parents receive individualized feedback. For the peer video modeling group, a WhatsApp group is created, and parents are instructed to show the video daily before brushing. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using plaque and gingival indices.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The child responds to their name when called.
- The child maintains eye contact for at least 2-5 minutes.
- The child follows simple instructions (e.g., come, sit, open-close mouth).
- The child can use at. least one reward (food, toy, or verbal).
- No sensory hypersensitivity.
- No antibiotic use in the last month.
- No additional plaque control application in the last 5 months.
- At least 20 teeth present.
- Not undergoing orthodontic treatment.
- No systemic diseases affecting oral health (e.g., Down syndrome, diabetes).
- Average intelligence level comparable to peers.
- Able to brush teeth independently.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to sit in a specific place for 10 minutes.
- Refusal of physical contact (mouth, face, body).
- Severe autism (Grade 3).
- Mental retardation.
- Lack of parental consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Umraniye Community Mental Health Center
Istanbul, Ümraniye, 34760, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The pediatric dentist who conducted the examinations, the special education teacher who assigned the groups, and the statistician were all blind to the study.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MSc, PhD, Registered Nurse
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2026
First Posted
March 25, 2026
Study Start
September 20, 2021
Primary Completion
June 23, 2025
Study Completion
June 23, 2025
Last Updated
March 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share