Evaluation of the Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Perineal Healing Following Abdominoperineal Amputation
AAPICO
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Abdomino-perineal resection is a surgical procedure involving the removal of the rectum and anus via abdominal and perineal approaches. During this procedure, a terminal colostomy is created and the perineum is closed. This procedure is indicated for patients with non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lower and very lower rectum (where preservation of the sphincter apparatus is not possible) or squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal that does not respond to chemoradiotherapy. Most often, treatment for non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lower and very lower rectum is part of a therapeutic sequence that includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery 7 to 12 weeks later. Recently, the GRECCAR group (Rectal Surgery Research Group) published the results of the Prodigy 23 study demonstrating the benefit of intensification chemotherapy prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This neoadjuvant regimen, and in particular chemoradiotherapy, can lead to impaired postoperative wound healing due to radiation-damaged tissue. The incidence of impaired wound healing following chemoradiotherapy varies in the literature, with rates ranging from 30% to 70%. These wound complications can lead to local skin infections that may progress to pelvic sepsis, resulting in septic shock. The perineum can be closed directly with a skin suture, but perineal reconstructions using a musculocutaneous flap have also been described. These reconstruction techniques require more extensive operating room coordination due to the need for a plastic and reconstructive surgery team. For this reason, the use of musculocutaneous flaps is not routine. In recent years, pharmaceutical companies have developed a negative-pressure wound therapy system that allows for the absorption of infectious material and exudate through the wound. This system is intended to reduce surgical site infections. Results in the literature are inconsistent, with varying indications. Rather et al. report a nearly 40% improvement in wound healing using a negative pressure therapy system on a closed perineal wound. In the literature review published by Meyer et al. in 2021, positive results of this technique are reported, with a 25% to 30% improvement in wound healing. These results are encouraging, but currently there are no studies with a high level of evidence analyzing this practice. For this reason, it is necessary to evaluate negative pressure therapy on perineal scars following chemoradiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2029
May 22, 2026
May 1, 2026
3.1 years
March 18, 2026
May 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The occurrence of at least one infectious complication at the perineal incision site within 45 days of the procedure.
The 45-day period was chosen to allow for evaluation of the wound before resuming adjuvant therapy, particularly chemotherapy. To avoid worsening the patient's oncological prognosis, adjuvant therapy must be resumed between 6 and 8 weeks after surgery. A perineal infection will be defined by perineal discharge with a bacteriological culture and the initiation of antibiotic therapy, or the presence of a pelvic collection on an abdominal-perineal CT scan associated with a biological inflammatory syndrome (white blood cell count \> 10,000/mm³ and CRP \> 5 mg/L).
45-day
Study Arms (2)
Standard: Direct perineal skin suture;
SHAM COMPARATORExperimental: Direct perineal skin suturing with negative pressure wound therapy (PICO 7®)
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The PICO 7® single-use negative pressure wound therapy system consists of a pump and two sterile dressings. The PICO 7® pump maintains a negative pressure of 80 mmHg (nominal) at the wound surface. Wound exudate is managed by the dressing through a combination of absorption and evaporation of moisture through the outer film. PICO 7® is designed for use on wounds measuring up to 400 cm³ (surface area x depth), considered to be mildly to moderately exudative, and can be used on sutured surgical wounds. For prophylaxis, the dressing is applied for a period of 14 days, with the dressing and pump replaced on the 7th day.
Patients receive a skin suture that is checked daily during their hospital stay to ensure there are no local complications. Dressings are not routinely applied to the skin suture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient;
- Patient scheduled to undergo abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the lower and very lower rectum following chemoradiotherapy (50 Gy over 5 weeks);
- Patients capable of following the clinical trial protocol and who have provided written informed consent to participate in the clinical trial;
- Patients enrolled in the social security system or eligible for coverage;
You may not qualify if:
- Patients scheduled to undergo a salvage abdominoperineal resection for squamous cell carcinoma following chemoradiotherapy;
- Patients scheduled to undergo an abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the very low rectum without neoadjuvant therapy;
- Patients with a known allergy to the dressing;
- Patients with a contraindication to the use of the PICO 7® dressing:
- Malignancy within the wound bed or at the wound margins;
- Previously confirmed, untreated osteomyelitis;
- Non-enteric, unexplored fistulas;
- Necrotic tissue with pressure ulcers;
- Exposed arteries, veins, nerves, or organs;
- Exposed anastomotic sites;
- Patients participating in another clinical research protocol that could affect the objectives of this clinical trial;
- Patients already randomized in this clinical trial;
- Pregnant patients, women in labor, breastfeeding women, or women of childbearing age not using effective contraception\*;
- Patients under guardianship, conservatorship, or deprived of their liberty;
- Patients under an activated future protection order;
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Chu Amiens
Amiens, 80054, France
Chu Angers
Angers, 49933, France
Chd Vendee
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925, France
Hospital Saint Antoine (Aphp)
Paris, France
Chu Rennes
Rennes, 35033, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emeric ABET, Dr.
CHD Vendee
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2026
First Posted
March 24, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 15, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 15, 2029
Last Updated
May 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share