NCT07488910

Brief Summary

This study investigates how antidepressant pharmacotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or their combination modulate the temporal dynamics and connectivity of depressive symptom networks. Using intensive longitudinal ecological momentary assessment data, the trial examines treatment-specific changes in symptom interactions. By applying network-based analytic approaches, the study aims to elucidate differential and potentially complementary mechanisms of change across treatment modalities. Findings may contribute to more informed and individualized treatment strategies for major depressive disorder.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
19mo left

Started Feb 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress16%
Feb 2026Jan 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2026

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2026

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 23, 2026

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2028

Last Updated

March 23, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

February 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Structure of symptom networks via multilevel vector autoregressive modeling (mlVAR)

    Planned network intervention analyses will focus on intervention-specific effects at the symptom-network level. We will describe whether each of the three interventions shows differential direct associations with specific depressive symptoms or processes, operationalized as edges between intervention indicators and symptom/process nodes. We will also examine whether the interventions differ in their pattern of indirect associations within the network, that is, whether changes in some symptoms appear to be associated with downstream changes in other symptoms or processes. In addition, we will compare centrality metrics of depressive symptoms across interventions and over time.

    From Baseline (2 weeks) to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D)

    From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)

  • Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)

  • The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology clinician (IDS-C)

    From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)

  • Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)

    Immediately at Inclusion

  • Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Short Form (PANAS-SF)

    From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Psychopharmacological treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive psychopharmacological treatment according to guideline-based clinical practice.

Drug: Psychopharmacological treatment

Psychotherapeutical group treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive manualized cognitive-behavioral group psychotherapy.

Behavioral: Cognitive-behavioral group treatment (CBGT-D)

Combined intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Combination of the aforementioned psychopharmacological and cognitive-behavioral group treatment.

Drug: Psychopharmacological treatmentBehavioral: Cognitive-behavioral group treatment (CBGT-D)

Interventions

Participants will receive outpatient treatment with escitalopram. Treatment will be initiated at 5 mg/day for three days and increased to a target dose of 10 mg/day. Clinical re-evaluations will take place after two and four weeks. In case of insufficient clinical response, the dose may be increased to 15 mg/day in accordance with guideline recommendations.

Combined interventionPsychopharmacological treatment

Consisting of a group treatment of the same time frame as the psychopharmacological treatment and includes the following components: psychoeducation, behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, social problem-solving, homework assignments and relapse prevention.

Combined interventionPsychotherapeutical group treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Depressive disorder (mild to moderate symptom severity)
  • years
  • must own a smartphone with internet access

You may not qualify if:

  • severe depressive episode
  • acute suicidality,
  • bipolar disorder,
  • substance use disorder
  • psychotic depression
  • severe medical or neurological illness
  • insufficient german language skills
  • concurrent psychotherapeutic treatment
  • conditions that may interfere with fMRI

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

Frankfurt, 60486, Germany

Location

Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy

Frankfurt, 60528, Germany

Location

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Marburg, 35039, Germany

Location

Study Officials

  • Igor Nenadic, Prof. Dr.

    Philipps University Marburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Due to the nature of the interventions, full blinding is not feasible. Participants are aware of their assigned treatment condition, as the interventions differ in format (e.g., pharmacotherapy versus group CBT). Similarly, therapists and prescribing physicians are not blinded. However, clinical outcome assessments, specifically structured interviews such as the HAM-D, are conducted by trained raters who remain blinded to group allocation wherever possible. To reduce analytical bias, data analysis will be conducted on pseudonymized datasets, with group identifiers masked during preprocessing and statistical modeling stages (Schulz et al., 2010).
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study employs a parallel-group design with three arms: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) pharmacotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered in a group format, and a combination of both interventions. The study is multicentred across two locations encompassing three study centres.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Goethe Research Professorship

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2026

First Posted

March 23, 2026

Study Start

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Last Updated

March 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations