Integrative Bilateral Cervical Sympathetic Blocks for Trauma-Related Symptoms in Special Operations Veterans: A Prospective Case Series
1 other identifier
observational
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study prospectively evaluates the effects of Integrative Bilateral Cervical Sympathetic Block (BCSB) on trauma-related symptoms in Special Operations Veterans, comparing outcomes in those receiving BCSB alone versus BCSB combined with structured integrative therapy. Using standardized FDA-approved dosing, validated symptom measures, and strict safety criteria, the study aims to determine whether this dual-level autonomic intervention improves PTSD-related and TBI-related symptoms, and whether pairing the procedure with therapy enhances durability and overall clinical benefit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 24, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
March 20, 2026
March 1, 2026
11 months
March 11, 2026
March 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5
In a military context, the PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) is one of the most commonly used psychological questionnaires. Derived from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), the PCL-5 contains 20 self-report items assessing the degree to which individuals have been bothered by PTSD symptoms. Items are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4. Individuals who score 33 or higher on the PCL-5 meet the cutoff commonly used to indicate PTSD. The PCL-5 has demonstrated internal consistency and validity in civilian populations, as well as in a study of service members (N = 12) (Wortmann et al., 2016).
From baseline to 7, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 270 days post BCSB procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
General Anxiety Disorder - 7
From baseline to 7, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 270 days post BCSB procedure.
Adult Hope Scale
From baseline to 7, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 270 days post BCSB procedure.
Moral Injury Symptom Scale - Military Short Form
From baseline to 7, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 270 days post BCSB procedure.
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory
From baseline to 7, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 270 days post BCSB procedure.
Study Arms (1)
Ropivacaine Based BCSB
This cohort consists of combat veterans participating in the RESET study to evaluate the effects of bilateral cervical sympathetic ganglion blocks (BCSB) on post-traumatic stress symptoms and suicide risk. Participants receive one procedures as a clinical intervention. Some participants may decided to access additional therapies, making BCSB an integrative model.
Interventions
This study is distinct because it evaluates an integrative, dual-level bilateral cervical sympathetic block (BCSB), a more comprehensive autonomic intervention than the traditional unilateral SGB, specifically in Special Operations Veterans, a uniquely high-trauma, high-TBI population rarely studied. It is also the first to directly compare BCSB alone versus BCSB combined with structured integrative psychological therapy, using a prospective design with validated outcome measures, strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, and standardized FDA-approved dosing. By incorporating TBI-specific symptom tracking and applying IND-level rigor in a specialized trauma-informed clinical setting, this study fills critical gaps left by prior SGB research and offers a clearer understanding of who benefits most and why.
Eligibility Criteria
This study will include adult Special Operations Forces (SOF) veterans with PTSD who meet eligibility criteria who are through the Operator Relief Fund network of care. Individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are considered a vulnerable population due to potential emotional sensitivity and risk of psychological distress. Because of this, additional safeguards will be used during recruitment and enrollment to prevent coercion, protect autonomy, and support participant well-being. These safeguards include the use of neutral recruitment language, IRB-approved scripts, and clear communication that participation is entirely voluntary. This study will not discriminate based on race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, religion, marital status, disability, or socioeconomic status. All eligible individuals will be given equal opportunity to participate.
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- PTSD (PCL Score of 33 or greater at baseline screening)
- Willing and able to provide informed consent and complete study procedures
- Fluent in English
- Special Operations Forces Veteran
You may not qualify if:
- Recent Sympathetic Block: Receipt of any cervical sympathetic block (including stellate ganglion block \[SGB\], dual sympathetic ganglion block \[DSGB\], or bilateral SGB/BCSB), whether unilateral or bilateral, within the past 6 months.
- Concurrent interventional clinical trial participation: Currently enrolled in another interventional clinical trial or receiving any experimental treatment targeting PTSD, TBI, or autonomic dysfunction during the study period
- Acute Psychiatric Instability: Currently experiencing acute psychiatric crisis requiring inpatient care, active suicidal or homicidal intent, or untreated mania, psychosis, or severe dissociation
- Medical Contraindications to BCSB: Any known anatomical abnormalities, bleeding disorders, allergy to local anesthetics, pregnancy, or comorbidities that represent a contraindication to receiving a cervical sympathetic block, per the treating physician's judgment.
- Language or communication barriers: Inability to read, speak, or understand English sufficiently to complete informed consent and study assessments
- Low PTSD Symptom Severity at Baseline: PCL-5 Score \< 33 at screening, indicating subclinical or minimal PTSD symptoms (Rationale: to ensure measurable clinical benefit and reduce floor effects)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Reset Medical and Wellness Center
Strongsville, Ohio, 44136, United States
Related Publications (7)
Wortmann, J. H., Jordan, A. H., Weathers, F. W., Resick, P. A., Dondanville, K. A., Hall-Clark, B., Foa, E. B., Young-McCaughan, S., Yarvis, J. S., Hembree, E. A., Mintz, J., Peterson, A. L., & Litz, B. T. (2016). Psychometric Analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) Among Treatment-Seeking Military Service Members. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1392-1403. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000260
BACKGROUNDLindberg, M. A., Moy Martin, E. M., & Marion, D. W. (2022). Military Traumatic Brain Injury: The History, Impact, and Future. Journal of neurotrauma, 39(17-18), 1133-1145. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0103
BACKGROUNDLabrosciano, K., Dorrian, J., Lowies, B., Russell, R., & Lushington, K. (2025). Adult Hope Scale: validation in older adults. Australian journal of psychology, 77(1), 2532077. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2025.2532077
BACKGROUNDKoenig, H. G., Ames, D., Youssef, N. A., Oliver, J. P., Volk, F., Teng, E. J., Haynes, K., Erickson, Z. D., Arnold, I., O'Garo, K., & Pearce, M. (2018). Screening for Moral Injury: The Moral Injury Symptom Scale - Military Version Short Form. Military Medicine, 183(11-12), e659-e665. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy017
BACKGROUNDAshendorf, L. (2019). Neurobehavioral symptom validity in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mild traumatic brain injury evaluations. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(4), 432-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1567693
BACKGROUNDAhmadi, A., Ponder, W. N., Carbajal, J., Schuman, D. L., Whitworth, J., Yockey, R. A., & Galusha, J. M. (2023). Validation of the PCL-5, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 in a Sample of Veterans. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 65(8), 643-654. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002898
BACKGROUNDMulvaney, S. W., Lynch, J. H., Mahadevan, S., Dineen, K. J., & Rae Olmsted, K. L. (2024). The effect of bilateral, two-level cervical sympathetic chain blocks on specific symptom clusters for traumatic brain injury, independent of concomitant PTSD symptoms. Brain Sciences, 14(12), 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121193
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Louwers, MD
Reset Medical and Wellness Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 270 Days
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Director and CEO Reset Medical and Wellness Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2026
First Posted
March 16, 2026
Study Start
March 20, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 24, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The study team has elected not to share individual participant data, including deidentified datasets. This decision is based on ethical and methodological considerations specific to the study population and design. Participants are Special Operations Forces veterans, a population for whom concerns about privacy, stigma, and downstream use of sensitive mental health data may negatively affect willingness to participate. Additionally, given the observational case series design, small sample size, and context-dependent clinical variables, secondary analyses by external parties could result in misinterpretation or inappropriate conclusions that do not reflect the study's intent or limitations. Aggregate results and summary-level findings will be reported publicly through ClinicalTrials.gov and peer-reviewed publications to support transparency while prioritizing participant trust and data integrity.