Midfoot Osteotomy Versus 8-Plate Epiphysiodesis for Residual Metatarsal Adductus
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Epiphysiodesis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 18, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 18, 2028
March 12, 2026
March 1, 2026
1 year
February 24, 2026
March 7, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the results of the two technical procedures of surgical treatment by Radiological correction
radiological correction assessed using the Demiglio score to evaluate the outcome of the two surgical techniques.
6 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Midfoot Osteotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORA closing wedge osteotomy of the cuboid will be performed using an oscillating saw, with the wedge size determined according to the severity of forefoot adduction.
8-Plate Epiphysiodesis
ACTIVE COMPARATORA guidewire will be inserted to confirm proper positioning. A tension-band eight-plate was will then be placed bridging the lateral side of the calcaneocuboid region, with two cannulated 3.5 mm screws inserted-one into the cuboid and one into the calcaneus-ensuring central placement within the cuboid to modulate lateral column growth.
Interventions
Group 1 Immobilization in along leg (above knee cast) for 6 weeks Non-weight bearing during casting period Cast removal followed by gradual return to weight bearing
NO immobilization, only protective splinting for 2 weeks as postoperative rest, after splint removal return to normal activity. Plate will be removed after full clinical and radiological correction. Further procedures e.g. tibalis anterior tendon transfer can be done as needed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients are eligible for participation in the study if
- Age between 5 to 10 years old
- Relapsed idiopathic clubfoot (CTEV)
- Presence of residual metatarsal adductus
You may not qualify if:
- Patients are excluded for participation in the study if
- Teratologic clubfoot (e.g., myelomeningocele).
- Children under 4 years of mild severity that could be corrected with conservative treatment, or above 10 years old.
- flexible (correctable) deformity of the foot.
- Cases recurrent after midtarsal osteotomy
- Neuromuscular CTEV, or arthrogryposis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Zhao H, Ruan H, Cao Y, Yuan H, Kang Q. Outcomes of Eight-Plate Epiphysiodesis for Residual Clubfoot Deformities. Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3417-3422. doi: 10.1111/os.13548. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
PMID: 36254364RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- specialist of orthopedic surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2026
First Posted
March 12, 2026
Study Start
February 18, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 18, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 18, 2028
Last Updated
March 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share