Comparison of Dynamic Ultrasound Visual Feedback to Manual Feedback on Scapular Stabilizer Activation and Change in the Subacromial Space in Persons With Pain During Shoulder Elevation
SCAP-M-RUSI
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose of the Study This study looks at whether using real-time ultrasound images as feedback can help people better activate two important shoulder muscles-the serratus anterior and lower trapezius-compared to standard verbal or visual feedback from a clinician. The study also examines whether this training carries over to everyday arm movements and whether it helps create more space inside the shoulder joint. Why This Matters Shoulder pain is very common. One possible cause is poor movement or poor muscle control of the shoulder blade, which can reduce the space under the shoulder and lead to pain. The serratus anterior and lower trapezius muscles help the shoulder blade move correctly when lifting the arm. Improving how these muscles work may reduce pain and improve shoulder function. How the Study Is Done People with shoulder pain will take part in the study in a university laboratory. They will be randomly placed into one of two groups: One group will receive muscle training with ultrasound images that show their muscles working in real time. The other group will receive standard feedback without ultrasound. Participants will perform specific shoulder exercises targeting the two muscles. Muscle activity will be measured before and after training using specialized sensors. The researchers will also see if the muscle training improves muscle use during a more functional movement, such as lifting the arm to shoulder height. In addition, ultrasound will be used to measure the space inside the shoulder joint before and after training. Why This Is Important for Care If ultrasound feedback is shown to be effective, it could give physical therapists and other clinicians a new tool to help patients better activate key shoulder muscles. This may improve treatment options for people with shoulder pain, especially pain at the top of the shoulder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2028
March 11, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.7 years
February 18, 2026
March 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Muscle activity during functional task
Intramuscular electromyography will be used to record muscle activity during a functional task
Immediately after treatment administration (Day 1)
Subacromial space size
Ultrasound imaging will be used to measure the size of the subacromial space
Immediately after treatment administration (Day 1)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Muscle activity during a muscle specific task
Immediately after treatment administration (Day 1)
Study Arms (2)
Standardized exercise feedback
ACTIVE COMPARATORExercise will be performed with tactile and verbal feedback only
Standardized exercise feedback with dynamic ultrasound feedback
EXPERIMENTALStandard feed back of verbal and tactile cueing with the addition of dynamic ultrasound imaging feedback
Interventions
Verbal and tactile feedback are provided to the subject to improve the quality of the exercise being performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects with apical shoulder pain
- Pain level \>2 on the numeric pain rating scale
- Able to elevate shoulder beyond 140º
- Able to perform all research activities without difficulty
You may not qualify if:
- Experience shoulder pain \> 6 on the numeric pain rating scale
- Presence of a known neurological disorder
- Shoulder pain only elicited with neck movements
- History of shoulder fracture or surgery involving the glenohumeral joint capsule
- Diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis
- Previously received treatment for the scapular upward rotators
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pathokinesiology Research Laboratory
Long Beach, California, 90840, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George J Beneck, PT, PhD
California State University, Long Beach
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2026
First Posted
March 11, 2026
Study Start
January 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 15, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Last Updated
March 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There's no perceived benefits for sharing IPD.