NCT07458178

Brief Summary

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains a common and potentially life-threatening emergency condition requiring early risk stratification to guide clinical management. Although several validated scoring systems such as Rockall, Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS), AIMS65, H3B2, ABC, ABL, and Pre-endoscopic Rockall (Pre-RS) are widely used, their discriminative performance for identifying patients at high clinical risk varies across populations. This retrospective, single-center observational study included 312 adult patients admitted to the emergency department between January 2024 and January 2026 with clinical manifestations of UGIB. Patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk groups based on clinically significant outcomes, including transfusion requirement, endoscopic/radiological/surgical intervention, intensive care unit admission, rebleeding, or in-hospital mortality. The primary objective was to develop a novel risk score (HOLD\_B), derived from independent predictors identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine optimal cut-off values for continuous predictors and to evaluate discriminative performance. The newly developed score was compared with established scoring systems using area under the curve (AUC) analysis and DeLong's test for pairwise comparisons. The study aims to provide a simplified and clinically applicable risk stratification tool for early identification of high-risk UGIB patients in the emergency department setting.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
312

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 3, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

March 3, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleedingrisk scoreshigh risk bleeding

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcome is the ability of the HOLD-B score to identify patients with high-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

    The HOLD-B score (Hemoglobin, Lactate, Diastolic Blood Pressure, Blood Urea Nitrogen) is a risk stratification score developed in this study. The score ranges from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate a higher probability of high-risk clinical outcomes. Based on ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value is 3.5. High-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following events during hospitalization: blood transfusion endoscopic hemostatic intervention intensive care unit admission rebleeding in-hospital mortality Predictive performance will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC).

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • compare the effectiveness of the newly developed risk score

    1 year

Study Arms (3)

upper gastrointestinal bleeding

clinical manifestations of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and subsequently hospitalized during

High-Risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding group

Patients were classified as high risk if they met at least one of the following criteria during hospitalization: Requirement for blood transfusion Endoscopic hemostatic intervention Radiological intervention Surgical intervention Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission Re-bleeding In-hospital mortality This composite definition was used to reflect clinically significant deterioration or the need for advanced care.

Low risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding group

Patients who did not meet any of the above high-risk criteria during hospitalization were classified as low risk.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Demographic characteristics, presenting complaints, comorbid conditions, regularly used medications, mental status, vital signs, laboratory values, admission locations, blood transfusion requirements, endoscopic hemostasis procedures, radiological interventions, surgical procedures, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and in-hospital mortality data were obtained from the electronic patient record system. All data were recorded by a single physician using a pre-prepared data collection form.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department between January 2024 and January 2026
  • Clinical presentation suggestive of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, including hematemesis, melena, or hematochezia suspected to originate from the upper gastrointestinal tract due to rapid intestinal transit
  • Patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during the index hospitalization
  • Presence of endoscopic findings confirming upper gastrointestinal pathology
  • Availability of complete clinical, laboratory, and outcome data in the hospital information management system
  • Patients evaluated and managed in the Emergency Department of İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \<18 years
  • Patients presenting with cardiac arrest at admission
  • Intubated patients at the time of emergency department presentation
  • Presence of concomitant active infectious diseases
  • Patients diagnosed with esophageal variceal bleeding
  • Use of medications known to increase serum lactate levels, including:
  • metformin
  • β2-agonists
  • methotrexate
  • zidovudine
  • linezolid
  • Patients with missing or incomplete clinical or laboratory data
  • Patients whose hospital outcomes could not be determined during follow-up

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Guner NG, Catal F, Yurumez Y, Guneysu F, Bostanci F. Comparison of the new risk score (ABL) with the Glasgow Blatchford Score, AIMS65, and pre-endoscopic Rockall Score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to the emergency department. BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01291-z.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD PhD Assoc. Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2026

First Posted

March 9, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion

January 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations