Accuracy of the Accuro 3S
Feasibility and Accuracy of the Accuro 3S
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of the Accuro 3S to provide live guidance when performing a neuraxial technique (e.g., spinal, or epidural). The Accuro 3S is a new device that was designed to allow for midline live neuraxial guidance. If the device can perform as the manufacturers claim the device will permit the performance of epidurals as close as doing them under fluoroscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2028
September 23, 2026
September 1, 2026
1.3 years
February 19, 2026
September 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Mean number of needle attempts
Defined as the number of times the needle is inserted into patients back
At time of procedure, 1 day
Mean number of needle redirections
Defined as number of needle movements in a cephalad, caudal or lateral position.
At time of procedure, 1 day
Accuracy of device
The ultrasound device can be used to measure the distance from skin to epidural space, this will be recorded as the estimated distance to epidural space (EDES). Once the epidural space is accessed the needle will be marked and measured. This will represent the Distance to epidural space (DES). The difference between EDES and DES will provide the accuracy of the device. Mean distance in centimeters (cm).
At time of procedure, 1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient satisfaction
20 minutes post procedure
Study Arms (1)
Standard of Care and neuraxial guidance
EXPERIMENTALSpinal or Epidural will be performed utilizing neuraxial guidance and standard of care techniques for placement. The spinal or epidural technique will not deviate from the standard of care. The device will only add the use of the disposable sterile drape and the use of the image will guide change of needle trajectory (without the need for contrast or radiation exposure) but not changing the technique.
Interventions
Provides anatomical guidance during the placement of needles or catheters using real-time visualization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The anesthetic plan for the patient includes a neuraxial anesthetic (spinal or epidural) as the main anesthetic for labor, surgery (e.g. orthopedic surgery, cesarean delivery) or for postoperative pain management (e.g, major abdominal surgery). \*Given our labor and delivery volume (\~300 epidurals/month) investigators think that they will only recruitc obstetric patients. In case of difficulty recruiting, then investigators will seek out a different patient population.
- No history of allergic reactions to adhesives used in standard epidural placements as per chart review or self-reported.
- Patient skin is intact in the area of placement of the epidural or spinal anesthesia.
- The patient is English speaking.
- For obstetric patients, the patient is admitted for cesarean delivery or for induction and is not in active labor. \*Clarification - Patients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery will be approached for spinal anesthesia. Given that spinal anesthesia carries a smaller risk for post-dural puncture headache and other morbidities, investigators will recruit and perform 10 spinals on this patient population. Once comfortable with the technology, then will move to recruiting and performing epidurals. If during the spinal anesthesia trial the device does not provide accurate and clear needle visualization, the study will be culminated.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to epidural catheter placement including bleeding diathesis (essential thrombocythemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, von Willebrand disease, and hemophilia A or B), neurological dysfunction (multiple sclerosis, subacute myeloopticoneuropathy or preexisting lower limb neurological deficit), prior extensive spinal surgery or major spinal deformity, pre-operative use of anti-coagulant with planned use of therapeutic dose of anti-coagulant in post-operatively, documented pre-operative coagulopathy (INR greater than 1.3 not on Coumadin or PTT greater than 42), platelets less than 100, 000, or evidence of infection at potential epidural site.
- Presence of orthopedic implants in the spine.
- Skin dyscrasias or allergies to the ultrasound procedure.
- Unable to assume sitting position.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 18.5 kg/m2.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
- Rivanna Medical, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antonio Gonzalez-Fiol, MD
Yale University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2026
First Posted
March 9, 2026
Study Start
October 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 15, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 15, 2028
Last Updated
September 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share