Right Colon Adenoma Detection Rate Using Water Exchange Versus Air Insufflation in Colonoscopy.
A Patient Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Right Colon Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy Using Right Colon Water Exchange and Traditional Air Insufflation
1 other identifier
interventional
414
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although colonoscopy is currently regarded as the gold standard to detect and prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) but post-colonoscopy CRCs (interval cancer, IC) still occur. Recent studies demonstrated that protection by colonoscopy against right-sided colon cancer was lower than that attained in the left colon. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been correlated with IC - each 1 % increase in ADR is associated with 3% decrease in the risk of ICs. Hopefully, innovations that improve right colon ADR would reduce the right colon IC. Insertion water exchange (WE), characterized by infusing water to guide the advance of the colonoscope in an airless lumen with its removal mainly during insertion. WE has been shown to improve the overall and right colon ADR compared to traditional air insufflation (Air). Several plausible causes have been proposed to explain the enhanced ADR by WE, including decreased multitasking related distraction, improved bowel cleanness, and flat polyps appearing less flatten and floating up in water Therefore, the adoption of WE in the right colon might be especially beneficial. In addition, WE has been criticized for prolonged insertion time, about 3-5 minutes longer than Air to reach the cecum and required a learning curve of about 50 to 100 cases.In this study, we devise a right colon WE method (RCWE), in which Air will be used to intubate to the hepatic flexure, followed by WE in the right colon. We test the hypothesis that RCWE would increase the right colon ADR without prolonging the insertion time. Consecutive patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic examinations performed by participating endoscopists will be stratified for enrollment. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (n=207 per group) to either the AI or RCWE group. Demographic data (age, gender, height, and weight), indications for colonoscopy, history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, constipation and chronic use of laxatives will be ascertained before colonoscopy. Quality of bowel preparation, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total procedure time, use of abdominal compression, need for change of position, presence and location of polyps and reasons for incomplete colonoscopy will be recorded. In addition, the right colon (from the hepatic flexure to cecum) insertion time and withdrawal time and infused and suction water amount will be recorded separately.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2026
CompletedJune 22, 2026
March 1, 2026
5.6 years
March 3, 2026
June 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
adenoma detection rate in proximal colon
The proportion of patients with the presence of adenoma in the proximal colon.
one week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
adenoma detection rate
one week
Other Outcomes (1)
Insertion time
During the procedure.
Study Arms (2)
Right colon water exchange group
EXPERIMENTALAir insufflation was used to advance the colonoscope to the hepatic flexure, where the insertion method was switched to water exchange (WE) to reach the cecum. This predefined transition was designed to specifically evaluate the effect of WE on right-sided colon adenoma detection.
Air insufflation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORCecal intubation was achieved using conventional air insufflation.
Interventions
Air insufflation was used to advance the colonoscope to the hepatic flexure, where the insertion method was switched to water exchange (WE) to reach the cecum. This predefined transition was designed to specifically evaluate the effect of WE on right-sided colon adenoma detection.Air insufflation was applied during withdrawal in both groups.
Behavioral: Air nsufflationAir was used to minimally distend the lumen during insertion. Water (30-50 mL aliquots) was delivered via syringe as needed to clear residual stool. Carbon dioxide was not used, as it is not standard practice for colonoscopy in Taiwan. Air insufflation was applied during withdrawal in both groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 40 to 80 years.
- Patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy.
- Colonoscopy performed by participating endoscopists.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
- Age \< 40 years or \> 80 years.
- History of colorectal surgery (e.g., partial colectomy).
- Known or suspected colorectal cancer.
- Known inflammatory bowel disease (e.g., ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease).
- Planned therapeutic colonoscopy (e.g., polypectomy).
- Inadequate bowel preparation.
- Known or suspected colonic obstruction or severe stricture.
- Massive ascites.
- Severe comorbid conditions (e.g., renal failure).
- Emergency colonoscopy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
Chiayi City, Chiayi, 62247, Taiwan
Related Publications (19)
Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
PMID: 19136102RESULTKudo Se, Lambert R, Allen JI, Fujii H, Fujii T, Kashida H, Matsuda T, Mori M, Saito H, Shimoda T, Tanaka S, Watanabe H, Sung JJ, Feld AD, Inadomi JM, O'Brien MJ, Lieberman DA, Ransohoff DF, Soetikno RM, Triadafilopoulos G, Zauber A, Teixeira CR, Rey JF, Jaramillo E, Rubio CA, Van Gossum A, Jung M, Vieth M, Jass JR, Hurlstone PD. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Oct;68(4 Suppl):S3-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.052. No abstract available.
PMID: 18805238RESULTThe Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02159-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 14652541RESULTRamirez FC, Leung FW. The water method for aiding colonoscope insertion: the learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):97-101. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18507. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PMID: 22163078RESULTFischer LS, Lumsden A, Leung FW. Water exchange method for colonoscopy: learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist in a U.S. community practice setting. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):128-132. doi: 10.4161/jig.23734. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
PMID: 23805393RESULTHsieh YH, Koo M, Tseng CW, Yang HW, Leung FW. Reduction of multitasking distractions underlies the higher adenoma detection rate of water exchange compared to air insufflation - blinded analysis of withdrawal phase videos. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):230-238. doi: 10.1177/2050640618817105. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
PMID: 31080608RESULTFuccio L, Frazzoni L, Hassan C, La Marca M, Paci V, Smania V, De Bortoli N, Bazzoli F, Repici A, Rex D, Cadoni S. Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):589-597.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.06.028. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
PMID: 29981753RESULTHsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1390-400. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.126. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
PMID: 24890443RESULTJia H, Pan Y, Guo X, Zhao L, Wang X, Zhang L, Dong T, Luo H, Ge Z, Liu J, Hao J, Yao P, Zhang Y, Ren H, Zhou W, Guo Y, Zhang W, Chen X, Sun D, Yang X, Kang X, Liu N, Liu Z, Leung F, Wu K, Fan D. Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):568-576. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.501. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
PMID: 27922025RESULTHsieh YH, Tseng CW, Hu CT, Koo M, Leung FW. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
PMID: 27988288RESULTCadoni S, Falt P, Rondonotti E, Radaelli F, Fojtik P, Gallittu P, Liggi M, Amato A, Paggi S, Smajstrla V, Urban O, Erriu M, Koo M, Leung FW. Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2017 May;49(5):456-467. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101229. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
PMID: 28282689RESULTCorley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.
PMID: 24693890RESULTRondagh EJ, Bouwens MW, Riedl RG, Winkens B, de Ridder R, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno RM, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S. Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
PMID: 22482917RESULTGupta S, Balasubramanian BA, Fu T, Genta RM, Rockey DC, Lash R. Polyps with advanced neoplasia are smaller in the right than in the left colon: implications for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Dec;10(12):1395-1401.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
PMID: 22835574RESULTNishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, Liao X, Qian ZR, Inamura K, Kim SA, Kuchiba A, Yamauchi M, Imamura Y, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E, Ogino S, Chan AT. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1095-105. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301969.
PMID: 24047059RESULTDoubeni CA, Weinmann S, Adams K, Kamineni A, Buist DS, Ash AS, Rutter CM, Doria-Rose VP, Corley DA, Greenlee RT, Chubak J, Williams A, Kroll-Desrosiers AR, Johnson E, Webster J, Richert-Boe K, Levin TR, Fletcher RH, Weiss NS. Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 1):312-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00003.
PMID: 23460054RESULTBaxter NN, Warren JL, Barrett MJ, Stukel TA, Doria-Rose VP. Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2664-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.4772. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
PMID: 22689809RESULTWinawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.
PMID: 8247072RESULTDekker E, Rex DK. Advances in CRC Prevention: Screening and Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(7):1970-1984. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.069. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
PMID: 29454795RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2026
First Posted
March 6, 2026
Study Start
June 9, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
January 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03