NCT07455474

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare effect of cold compression to standard of care in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

  • whether opioid use is decreased in the experimental cold compression group
  • whether patient reported outcomes and pain scores are reduced in the experimental cold compression group Participants will be randomized to standard postoperative care versus standard postoperative care with use of cold compression therapy Researchers will compare control and experimental cold compression groups to see if there are differences between groups

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 7, 2023

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2023

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 3, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 6, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

September 7, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

cold compressionpostoperative painshoulder surgeryarthroscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • postoperative opioid consumption using milligram morphine equivalents

    opioid consumption conversion of opioid consumption to MMEQ

    6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • VAS

    6 weeks

  • sleep quality

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

cold compression

EXPERIMENTAL

These patients will receive a cold compression device in addition to standard postoperative care

Device: Breg Polar Care Wave Cold Compression Device

control

NO INTERVENTION

This group will have standard postoperative care

Interventions

cold compression sleeve

cold compression

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff surgical repair between the dates of July 17, 2023, and November 30, 2023
  • Adult males and females ages 18 to 70
  • No prior experience using the Breg Polar Care Wave device
  • No adverse underlying medical conditions or comorbidities that may enhance pain, require drugs that interact with opioids, or otherwise confound the results
  • Ownership of or daily access to a smart phone or internet-connected computer

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff surgical repair outside the dates of July 17, 2023, and November 30, 2023
  • Adults aged 71 and above
  • Children below the age of 18
  • Other medical conditions or concomitant medication use that are known to negatively impact the outcome of rotator cuff repair
  • Concurrent participation in other studies
  • Prior experience using the Breg Polar Care Wave device
  • Do not have daily access to an internet-connected device to provide study data

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Mammoth Hospital

Mammoth Lakes, California, 93546, United States

Location

Taos Orthopedic Institute

Taos, New Mexico, 87571, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • 8 Reeves, B. Using Cold Therapy To Improve Patient Satisfaction and Reduce Opioid Use Post Surgery, 2018.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff InjuriesPain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon InjuriesPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Dan Guttmann, MD

    Taos Orthopedic Institute

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study will enroll a total of at least 60 subjects. The sample size is based on a matter of practical convenience, i.e., based on the number of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures reasonably expected to be performed on eligible patients during the study's time period at the clinical sites. We carried out power analysis using our anticipated sample size of 60 subjects for a two-sided t-test with a 95% confidence interval in G\*Power. For a small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large effect size (d=0.8), the achieved power would be 0.12, 0.48, or 0.86, respectively. Therefore, we anticipate good power for a large effect size and plan to carry out post hoc power analysis for insignificant results. An equal number of subjects are required for the control group and test group (described below); thus, each group of the study will be comprised of at least 30 subjects. This will be a multi-site study. As such, all study participants will be enrolled at one of the two clinical sites.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant Professor of Surgery CF

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2023

First Posted

March 6, 2026

Study Start

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion

March 1, 2025

Study Completion

March 3, 2026

Last Updated

March 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations