The Effectiveness of Dialectical Behavioral Group Psychotherapy Compared to Supportive Individual Psychotherapy In Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Study on Therapeutic Alliance, Depression, Cognitive Function, Impulsivity, Suicide Risk, BDNF Levels, NFkB Levels, SOD Levels
DBT BPD
2 other identifiers
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the context of therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder, our department had conduct a study titled "The Effectiveness of Dialectical Behavioral Group Psychotherapy Compared to Supportive Individual Psychotherapy in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Study of Therapeutic Alliance, Depression, Cognitive Function, Impulsivity, Suicide Risk, BDNF Levels, NFkB Levels, SOD Levels."
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2026
CompletedMarch 6, 2026
March 1, 2026
1 year
February 21, 2026
March 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Therapeutic Alliances with California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS)
California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS) score. A higher CALPAS (California Psychotherapy Alliance Scale) score indicates a stronger, more positive therapeutic alliance between a patient and their therapist. The California Psychotherapy Alliance Scale (CALPAS) uses a 7-point Likert scale for its 24 items, ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 7 ("very much so"). Minimum score 24 and maximum score 168.
13 weeks
Depression with GRID Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID HAM-D)
GRID Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID HAM-D) score, interval, higher total scores indicating greater severity of depression. Minimum Score: 0 (No depression) Maximum Score: 52 (Severe depression)
13 weeks
cognitive function with Montreal Cognitive Assesment versi Indonesia (MoCA-Ina)
Montreal Cognitive Assesment Indonesian version (MoCA-Ina) score, interval. A 30-point screening tool validated to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Indonesia, with a score of 26 or higher considered normal.
13 weeks
impulsivity with Barrat Impulsiveness Scale (BIS11)
Barrat Impulsiveness Scale (BIS11) score, interval, Higher scores indicate greater impulsivity, with 30-51 indicating low, 52-71 average, and 72+ high impulsivity.
13 weeks
Suicide Risk with Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS)
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) score, interval, Any "Yes" answer to behavior or ideation requires further clinical assessment.
13 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
NFkB Levels in ng/ml
13 weeks
BDNF level in pg/ml
13 weeks
SOD levels in ng/ml
13 weeks
Study Arms (2)
DBT group psychotherapy
EXPERIMENTAL13 weeks, one session per week. Each week, 2-hour dialectical therapy group session for 5 patients per group.
Suportive psychotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATOR13 weeks, one session per week. Each week, one 30-minute session of individual supportive psychotherapy.
Interventions
13 weeks, one session per week. Each week, one 2-hour dialectical therapy group session for 5 patients in a group.
13 weeks, one session per week. Each week, one 30-minute session of individual supportive psychotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-60 years old
- Diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V Axis II Disorders (SCID-II)
- Junior high school education or higher
- Patients willing to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Taking immunosuppressive drugs since one week before the study.
- Based on interviews or medical records, there is no history of post-stroke, epilepsy, or diabetes mellitus.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical Faculty Diponegoro University
Semarang, Central Java, 50275, Indonesia
Related Publications (1)
MacDowell KS, Marsa MD, Buenache E, Villatoro JML, Moreno B, Leza JC, Carrasco JL. Inflammatory and antioxidant pathway dysfunction in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb;284:112782. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112782. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
PMID: 31955054BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
M.I. Widiastuti MIW Widiastuti, Prof. dr.PAK(K), Sp.S(K), M.Sc
Medical Faculty Diponegoro University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Each patient was assigned an identification number, and the researcher who drew blood did not know whether the patient was in the treatment group or the control group
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Psychiatry Residency Study Program Medical Faculty, Diponegoro University. Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2026
First Posted
March 4, 2026
Study Start
December 16, 2021
Primary Completion
December 16, 2022
Study Completion
November 5, 2023
Last Updated
March 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. The dataset involves sensitive information from minors regarding mental health, and sharing it publicly would compromise participant confidentiality as per the ethical approval obtained.