Erector Spinae Plane vs Caudal Epidural Steroid in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Resistant to Conservative Therapy
A Prospective Comparative Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Refractory to Conservative Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of neurogenic claudication and functional limitation in older adults. Epidural steroid injections are frequently used in patients who do not respond to conservative treatments. The erector spinae plane block has recently emerged as a potential alternative interventional technique for pain control in lumbar spine disorders. This prospective comparative study will evaluate and compare the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block and caudal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis refractory to conservative treatment. Clinical outcomes including pain intensity, functional status, and walking capacity will be assessed at predefined follow-up intervals. The study aims to determine whether erector spinae plane block provides comparable or superior clinical benefit compared with caudal epidural steroid injection in this patient population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2026
CompletedMarch 3, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.3 years
February 19, 2026
February 25, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Leg Pain
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain measured on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores represent greater pain intensity.
Before injection; 1 hour after injection; 4 weeks after injection; 8 weeks after injection.
Study Arms (2)
erector spinae plane block
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to this arm received an ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block with corticosteroid and local anesthetic for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis-related pain.
caudal epidural steroid injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to this arm received a fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection with corticosteroid and local anesthetic for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis-related pain.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block performed at the lumbar level using local anesthetic under sterile conditions.
Caudal epidural steroid injection performed under sterile conditions using fluoroscopy according to institutional protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 30 and 80 years
- Patients with chronic low back pain (lasting longer than 6 months)
- Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) confirmed by imaging modalities (CT/MRI) and clinical evaluation
- LSS Diagnostic Support Tool Assessment (LSS-DST) score greater than 7
- Patients who did not benefit from previous conservative treatments
- Presence of a signed written informed consent form indicating willingness to participate in the study
- LSS-DST (Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - Diagnostic Support Tool) Scoring System
- Age 60-70 years: +1 point
- Age over 70 years: +2 points
- Absence of Diabetes Mellitus: +1 point
- Positive claudication: +3 points
- Symptoms aggravated by standing: +2 points
- Symptoms relieved by forward flexion: +3 points
- Symptoms induced by forward flexion: -1 point
- Symptoms induced by lumbar extension: +1 point
- +3 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- History of lumbar epidural steroid injection within the last 6 months or history of major trauma
- Known allergy to the study medications (lidocaine hydrochloride, dexamethasone 21-phosphate) or to contrast agents
- Presence of unstable chronic medical conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure)
- Advanced joint limitations preventing mobilization (e.g., hip or knee osteoarthritis)
- History of previous lumbar spine surgery
- Current anticoagulant therapy or history of coagulopathy
- History of malignancy
- History of polyneuropathy
- Presence of peripheral vascular disease
- Psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment that would interfere with completion of questionnaires and assessment scales (including significant visual or hearing impairment)
- Presence of local or systemic infection at the intended injection site
- Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Manchikanti L, Abdi S, Atluri S, Benyamin RM, Boswell MV, Buenaventura RM, Bryce DA, Burks PA, Caraway DL, Calodney AK, Cash KA, Christo PJ, Cohen SP, Colson J, Conn A, Cordner H, Coubarous S, Datta S, Deer TR, Diwan S, Falco FJ, Fellows B, Geffert S, Grider JS, Gupta S, Hameed H, Hameed M, Hansen H, Helm S 2nd, Janata JW, Justiz R, Kaye AD, Lee M, Manchikanti KN, McManus CD, Onyewu O, Parr AT, Patel VB, Racz GB, Sehgal N, Sharma ML, Simopoulos TT, Singh V, Smith HS, Snook LT, Swicegood JR, Vallejo R, Ward SP, Wargo BW, Zhu J, Hirsch JA. An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Part II: guidance and recommendations. Pain Physician. 2013 Apr;16(2 Suppl):S49-283.
PMID: 23615883BACKGROUNDAzevedo AS, Silva VTG, Xavier AL, da Silva LFF, Hojaij FC, Ashmawi HA, Vieira JE, Fernandes HS. Comparison of different injection volumes on spread of lumbar erector spinae plane block: An anatomical study. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Sep;72:110268. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110268. Epub 2021 Apr 10. No abstract available.
PMID: 33848824BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
hatice çetintürk şahin
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2026
First Posted
March 3, 2026
Study Start
October 10, 2024
Primary Completion
January 10, 2026
Study Completion
February 10, 2026
Last Updated
March 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share