Alcohol Neurolysis and Capsaicin for Postamputation Pain (PAP)
Randomized Controlled and Observational Studies Evaluating Alcohol Neurolysis and Capsaicin for Postamputation Pain (PAP)
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Postamputation pain is a complex condition that includes phantom limb pain (PLP), stump pain and residual limb pain (RLP), the latter of which may be referred from joints, the spine and inflamed bursa and tendons. PLP may have peripheral, spinal and central etiologies. The evidence of peripheral mechanisms includes the relief of both PLP and RLP during local anesthetic (LA) infusions, the relief of PLP and RLP with sympathetic blocks and neuroma injections, and the development of phantom radicular pain in amputees with a herniated disc. Neurolysis and defunctionalization are long-lasting treatments for pain when LA blocks provide temporary benefit, being most commonly used for cancer pain (e.g., celiac plexus neurolysis). Neurolysis has also been used to treat PAP, with uncontrolled studies showing benefit for both RLP and PLP. However, there are no controlled studies demonstrating efficacy. In this small study, we will evaluate the effectiveness of alcohol neurolysis of lower extremity neuromas (femoral or saphenous; sciatic or common peroneal and/or tibial; obturator and/ or lateral femoral cutaneous when pain is in those distributions) in individuals with RLP and PLP. For individuals with upper extremity amputation in whom non-selective neurolysis may affect the ability to use certain prosthetics that depend on functioning nerve and muscle signals, high-concentration capsaicin will be injected in an observational arm. The investigators will also examine factors associated with treatment outcome in a subset of patients (e.g., functional MRI, quantitative sensory testing).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2029
March 12, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.4 years
February 24, 2026
March 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Average phantom limb pain
Average phantom limb pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS)
6 weeks
Average residual limb pain
Residual limb pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS)
6 weeks after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (36)
Phantom limb pain
2 weeks
Residual limb pain
2 weeks
Worst residual limb pain
6 weeks
Worst phantom limb pain
6 weeks
Phantom limb pain
12 weeks
- +31 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Alcohol neurolysis
EXPERIMENTALInjection of 2 mL lidocaine 2% at each painful neuroma over 5 minutes, followed by 1.25-3.5 mL 98-100% dehydrated ethyl alcohol (the volume depends on the voltage threshold, i.e., thresholds \> 0.5 mL may warrant the higher volume). In those with bilateral lower extremity amputations, one leg will receive this treatment.
Capsaicin
OTHERObservational cohort for upper extremity amputees in which participants will receive 1.25-3.5 mL 150 micrograms/mL of capsaicin if they experience greater or equal to 30% pain relief after injection of 2 mL of lidocaine 2% at sites of painful neuromas.
Lidocaine only
ACTIVE COMPARATORInjection of 2 mL lidocaine 2% at each painful neuroma over 5 minutes, followed by 1.5 mL saline within 5 minutes.
Interventions
Injection of 98-100% alcohol over painful neuromas after lidocaine 2% injected.
Injection of Lidocaine 2% followed by normal saline
Painful upper neuroma neuromas will be injected if patients experience at least 30% pain relief with lidocaine. These patients (upper extremity amputees) are an observational cohort.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Age \>/= 18 years 2. At least 1 lower extremity amputation 3. Pain duration \>/= 1 month 4. Either average RLP or PLP in one or both (for those who have 2 lower limbs enrolled) amputated extremities \>/=4/10 5. Stable analgesic regimen over the past 10 days 6. Failure of physical therapy and at least 2 pharmacological treatments 7. At least 1 suspected painful neuroma, identified by Tinel's sign or pain with pressure or prosthetic use, referred pain in the distribution of the severed nerve, and neuropathic-type symptoms (tingling, shooting or lancinating pain)
You may not qualify if:
- \. Very poorly controlled psychiatric condition (e.g., PCL-5 score \> 60, \> 15 on the anxiety and/or depression section of HADS) 2. Poorly controlled medical condition that would preclude participation (e.g., heart failure, uncontrolled diabetes) 3. Patients in whom targeted muscle reinnervation or a similar procedure is being considered 4. Systemic infection or infection overlying the stump 5. Clinically-relevant injury to nerve fibers proximal to the amputation 6. Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwestern Universitylead
- First Lviv Medical Unioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
First Lviv Medical Union
Lviv, Ukraine
Related Publications (2)
Campbell CM, Diamond E, Schmidt WK, Kelly M, Allen R, Houghton W, Brady KL, Campbell JN. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of injected capsaicin for pain in Morton's neuroma. Pain. 2016 Jun;157(6):1297-1304. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000544.
PMID: 26963851BACKGROUNDZhang X, Xu Y, Zhou J, Pu S, Lv Y, Chen Y, Du D. Ultrasound-guided alcohol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation of painful stump neuroma: effective treatments for post-amputation pain. J Pain Res. 2017 Feb 3;10:295-302. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S127157. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28223839BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Lidocaine before alcohol neurolysis (which may be painful) will be given to facilitate participant masking
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2026
First Posted
March 2, 2026
Study Start
February 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2029
Last Updated
March 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03