Characterisation of a Population of Adults Suffering From Cystic Fibrosis in a Belgian Reference Center
1 other identifier
observational
162
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research project aims to better understand the consequences of diabetes on the quality of life, respiratory function, and nutritional status of patients with cystic fibrosis followed at a Belgian reference center and to compare the quality of life of patients with cystic fibrosis depending on whether or not they have diabetes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
March 2, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 months
February 12, 2026
February 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of quality of life between patients with cystic fibrosis according to the presence or absence of diabetes
Use the Short Form Haelth Survey SF-36, a questionnaire comprising 36 items to compare quality of life in patients with CF according to the presence or absence of CFRD. Score scale ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score means a better quality of life.
cross-sectional assessment at study inclusion
Comparison of ppFEV₁ between patients with cystic fibrosis according to the presence or absence of diabetes.
Predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) FEV₁ values, obtained through pulmonary function testing, will be compared between cystic fibrosis patients according to the presence or absence of diabetes
FEV₁ data will be collected retrospectively from medical records, using the value closest to the time of study inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of BMI between patients with cystic fibrosis according to the presence or absence of diabetes
Data will be collected retrospectively from medical records, using the value closest to the time of study inclusion
Hypoglycemia awareness and treatment satisfaction will be assessed using validated questionnaires and compared between patients with CFTR-related disease and those with type 1 diabetes.
Cross-sectional assessment at study inclusion
Comparison of glycemic control parameters in patients with Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes before and after initiation of CFTR modulator therapy.
Glycemic parameters will be recorded retrospectively at the visit closest to the initiation of CFTR modulator treatment and at the visit closest to study inclusion
Study Arms (3)
CF with CFRD group
Patients with cystic fibrosis and diabetes
CF without CFRD group
Patients with cystic fibrosis without diabetes
Type 1 diabetes group
Patients with type 1 diabetes as comparator group
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients with cystic fibrosis followed at a Belgian CF reference center, with or without cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. An additional age-matched cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes followed at the same hospital will be included for comparative analyses
You may qualify if:
- Adults ≥18 years Confirmed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis Followed at the participating CF reference center Ability to complete quality-of-life questionnaires Signed informed consent (if required by EC)
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate Inability to complete questionnaires
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital Erasme - HUB 808 route de Lennik 1070 Brussels Belgium
Brussels, 1070, Belgium
Related Publications (4)
Gupta N, Gupta A, Narayanan M R V. Current status of nitrous oxide use in pediatric patients. World J Clin Pediatr. 2022 Mar 9;11(2):93-104. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v11.i2.93. eCollection 2022 Mar 9.
PMID: 35433304BACKGROUNDMarks BE, Kilberg MJ, Aliaj E, Fredkin K, Hudson J, Riva D, Roman C, Kelly A, Putman MS. Perceptions of Diabetes Technology Use in Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes Management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Nov;23(11):753-759. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0201. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
PMID: 34185606BACKGROUNDTierney S, Webb K, Jones A, Dodd M, McKenna D, Rowe R, Whitehouse J, Deaton C. Living with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes or type 1 diabetes mellitus: a comparative study exploring health-related quality of life and patients' reported experiences of hypoglycaemia. Chronic Illn. 2008 Dec;4(4):278-88. doi: 10.1177/1742395308094240.
PMID: 19091936BACKGROUNDTsabari R, Elyashar HI, Cymberknowh MC, Breuer O, Armoni S, Livnat G, Kerem E, Zangen DH. CFTR potentiator therapy ameliorates impaired insulin secretion in CF patients with a gating mutation. J Cyst Fibros. 2016 May;15(3):e25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
PMID: 26547591BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Laurent Crenier
Erasme University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- University hospital professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2026
First Posted
March 2, 2026
Study Start
December 11, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant-level data from this study will not be shared with other researchers. The study includes a small, monocentric cohort of adults with cystic fibrosis, which may increase the risk of re-identification of participants even after de-identification. Additionally, the data contain sensitive clinical and health-related information, including quality-of-life assessments and diabetes status. To protect participant privacy and comply with ethical and institutional regulations, data sharing is not planned.