CGM-Guided Acarbose for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
170
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This Phase II pragmatic hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial tests whether acarbose, titrated using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to blunt post-prandial excursions, reduces 4-week pain area-under-the-curve (AUC) versus placebo in adults with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and high glycemic variability. Secondary objectives assess CGM variability metrics, microvascular reactivity, inflammatory markers, safety, and feasibility of a pharmacist-led titration workflow using loaner CGMs across multi-region community clinics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 diabetes
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2026
CompletedMarch 3, 2026
February 1, 2026
3 months
February 22, 2026
February 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Daily pain AUC
Daily pain AUC (ePRO; 0-10 NRS). Method: trapezoidal AUC of daily NRS scores; higher AUC = worse pain. Daily pain area under the curve derived from the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS). The NRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain. AUC is calculated using the trapezoidal method from daily NRS scores over the assessment period. Higher AUC values indicate greater overall pain burden.
baseline→Week 4
CGM MAGE (mg/dL)
CGM MAGE (mg/dL)
baseline→Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (4)
CGM Time-in-Range (70-180 mg/dL, %)
baseline→Week 4
Skin microvascular reactivity
baseline→Week 4
Serum IL-6
baseline→Week 4
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Week 4
Study Arms (2)
Arm A
EXPERIMENTALAcarbose with meals; pharmacist-led titration (e.g., 50 mg TID → up to 100 mg TID as tolerated) to curb post-prandial excursions based on CGM review. Background analgesics held stable.
Arm B
PLACEBO COMPARATORMatching placebo; identical titration schedule. Background analgesics held stable.
Interventions
Acarbose with meals; pharmacist-led titration (e.g., 50 mg TID → up to 100 mg TID as tolerated)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-75 years.
- Type 2 diabetes ≥1 year; HbA1c 7.0-10.0% within 8 weeks of randomization.
- Painful DPN meeting clinical criteria; average daily pain NRS ≥4 during run-in.
- High CGM variability on 7-10 day run-in (e.g., MAGE \>50 mg/dL).
- Stable analgesic regimen ≥4 weeks pre-baseline.
- Able to use CGM and ePRO; provides informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Type 1 diabetes; non-diabetic neuropathies.
- Contraindications to acarbose (e.g., chronic intestinal malabsorption, inflammatory bowel disease).
- eGFR \<45 mL/min/1.73 m²; significant hepatic disease (ALT/AST \>3× ULN).
- Use of α-glucosidase inhibitors within 3 months.
- Recent change (\<3 months) in GLP-1/GIP agonists, SGLT2i, or basal/bolus insulin strategy.
- Pregnancy/lactation; other conditions compromising safety/assessments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shifa International hospital
Lahore, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2026
First Posted
February 27, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 10, 2025
Last Updated
March 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication and for up to 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request following publication of the primary results. Requests must include a scientifically sound proposal and statistical analysis plan. Access will require approval by the sponsor and execution of a data use agreement.
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study, including the analyzable dataset and data dictionary, will be made available.