Using Artificial Intelligence to Help Doctors Identify Different Skin Conditions and Improve Patient Care
LegitHealthSAN
A Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study for Evaluating the Impact of Legit.Health Plus Device on the Healthcare Practitioners' Assessment of Skin Lesions
2 other identifiers
observational
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to determine if an artificial intelligence (AI) medical device can help doctors more accurately identify a wide variety of skin conditions and improve the efficiency of patient consultations. While many patients visit primary care for skin issues, general doctors may sometimes have different opinions from specialists, which can lead to delays in getting the right treatment. The researchers hypothesized that using the AI tool would increase the true diagnostic accuracy of healthcare professionals for multiple skin conditions. To test this, 16 doctors (including 10 general practitioners and 6 dermatologists) evaluated 29 different medical images. For each case, the doctors followed a structured process:
- Initial Assessment: Doctors first gave a diagnosis based only on the patient's image and medical history.
- AI Support: Doctors were then shown the AI's top five suggested diagnoses and confidence levels to see if they wished to adjust their final decision.
- Clinical Utility: Doctors also indicated if the patient required a specialist referral and if the case could be handled through a remote (online) consultation. The primary question the study tried to answer was whether AI support could significantly improve correct diagnoses across 13 different types of skin pathologies-ranging from common rashes to skin cancer-while also making the consultation process faster and more effective for both doctors and patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2026
CompletedFebruary 24, 2026
February 1, 2026
4 months
February 18, 2026
February 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Accuracy for Multiple Dermatological Conditions with and without Artificial Intelligence Support
This measure evaluates the "Top-1" diagnostic accuracy of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Accuracy is determined by comparing the clinician's identified diagnosis-both before and after receiving the AI device's top 5 suggestions and confidence levels-against a confirmed reference standard (confirmed by dermatologists or anatomical pathology)
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Dermatology Referral Rate Assisted by Artificial Intelligence.
Day 1
Percentage of Cases Deemed Manageable via Remote Consultation.
Day 1
Clinical Utility and Usability Scores for Diagnostic Support.
Day 1
Study Arms (1)
Healthcare Professionals (Primary Care Physicians and Dermatologists)
This group is composed of board-certified healthcare professionals (HCPs) who serve as the "readers" in this multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) study. The cohort is uniquely characterized by its internal comparison: each participant acts as their own control. - Dual Professional Roles: The group includes 10 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 6 dermatologists, allowing for a comparison between generalist and specialist diagnostic baseline performance. - Interventional Exposure: All participants are evaluated under two distinct conditions: first, providing a diagnosis based solely on clinical images and patient history; second, providing a diagnosis assisted by the AI-based medical device's top 5 suggestions and confidence levels. - Clinical Expertise: Every member of the cohort has a minimum of 5 years of clinical experience in their respective field.
Interventions
The intervention consists of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) software-only medical device that utilizes computer vision algorithms to analyze digital images of skin structures. During the study, healthcare professionals use the tool as a diagnostic support system to assist in the evaluation of complex dermatological conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of board-certified healthcare professionals recruited from the clinical fields of general medicine and dermatology. The participant group includes: * Primary Care Practitioners: General practitioners who often serve as the first point of contact for patients with dermatological symptoms. * Specialist Dermatologists: Physicians with advanced expertise in skin pathologies and rare conditions. * Experience Level: The cohort includes practitioners with at least 5 years of clinical experience in their respective specialities. Participants were recruited to engage in a remote, web-based evaluation environment rather than being selected from a single physical hospital or town. The clinical images evaluated as part of the study "cases" were sourced from international public dermatology atlases and existing research databases from the sponsor, representing a diverse global patient population.
You may qualify if:
- Board-certified primary care practitioners and dermatologists, regardless of their professional experience.
- High-quality images of patients with different skin conditions.
You may not qualify if:
- Low-quality images of patients which can not be properly analyzed.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AI Labs Group S.L.
Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antonio Martorell, PhD
Hospital Universitari de Manises
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2026
First Posted
February 24, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 10, 2024
Study Completion
October 10, 2024
Last Updated
February 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share