NCT07428954

Brief Summary

This study aims to determine if an artificial intelligence (AI) medical device can help doctors more accurately identify a wide variety of skin conditions and improve the efficiency of patient consultations. While many patients visit primary care for skin issues, general doctors may sometimes have different opinions from specialists, which can lead to delays in getting the right treatment. The researchers hypothesized that using the AI tool would increase the true diagnostic accuracy of healthcare professionals for multiple skin conditions. To test this, 16 doctors (including 10 general practitioners and 6 dermatologists) evaluated 29 different medical images. For each case, the doctors followed a structured process:

  • Initial Assessment: Doctors first gave a diagnosis based only on the patient's image and medical history.
  • AI Support: Doctors were then shown the AI's top five suggested diagnoses and confidence levels to see if they wished to adjust their final decision.
  • Clinical Utility: Doctors also indicated if the patient required a specialist referral and if the case could be handled through a remote (online) consultation. The primary question the study tried to answer was whether AI support could significantly improve correct diagnoses across 13 different types of skin pathologies-ranging from common rashes to skin cancer-while also making the consultation process faster and more effective for both doctors and patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 10, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 10, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 24, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

February 18, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Skin conditionsDermatologistsPrimary Care PhysiciansDiagnostic accuracy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic Accuracy for Multiple Dermatological Conditions with and without Artificial Intelligence Support

    This measure evaluates the "Top-1" diagnostic accuracy of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Accuracy is determined by comparing the clinician's identified diagnosis-both before and after receiving the AI device's top 5 suggestions and confidence levels-against a confirmed reference standard (confirmed by dermatologists or anatomical pathology)

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Dermatology Referral Rate Assisted by Artificial Intelligence.

    Day 1

  • Percentage of Cases Deemed Manageable via Remote Consultation.

    Day 1

  • Clinical Utility and Usability Scores for Diagnostic Support.

    Day 1

Study Arms (1)

Healthcare Professionals (Primary Care Physicians and Dermatologists)

This group is composed of board-certified healthcare professionals (HCPs) who serve as the "readers" in this multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) study. The cohort is uniquely characterized by its internal comparison: each participant acts as their own control. - Dual Professional Roles: The group includes 10 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 6 dermatologists, allowing for a comparison between generalist and specialist diagnostic baseline performance. - Interventional Exposure: All participants are evaluated under two distinct conditions: first, providing a diagnosis based solely on clinical images and patient history; second, providing a diagnosis assisted by the AI-based medical device's top 5 suggestions and confidence levels. - Clinical Expertise: Every member of the cohort has a minimum of 5 years of clinical experience in their respective field.

Device: AI-based medical device for aided diagnosis in Dermatology

Interventions

The intervention consists of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) software-only medical device that utilizes computer vision algorithms to analyze digital images of skin structures. During the study, healthcare professionals use the tool as a diagnostic support system to assist in the evaluation of complex dermatological conditions.

Healthcare Professionals (Primary Care Physicians and Dermatologists)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population consists of board-certified healthcare professionals recruited from the clinical fields of general medicine and dermatology. The participant group includes: * Primary Care Practitioners: General practitioners who often serve as the first point of contact for patients with dermatological symptoms. * Specialist Dermatologists: Physicians with advanced expertise in skin pathologies and rare conditions. * Experience Level: The cohort includes practitioners with at least 5 years of clinical experience in their respective specialities. Participants were recruited to engage in a remote, web-based evaluation environment rather than being selected from a single physical hospital or town. The clinical images evaluated as part of the study "cases" were sourced from international public dermatology atlases and existing research databases from the sponsor, representing a diverse global patient population.

You may qualify if:

  • Board-certified primary care practitioners and dermatologists, regardless of their professional experience.
  • High-quality images of patients with different skin conditions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Low-quality images of patients which can not be properly analyzed.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

AI Labs Group S.L.

Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DermatitisMelanomaAlopeciaUrticariaGranuloma AnnulareKeratosis, SeborrheicHerpes SimplexTineaPsoriasisAcne VulgarisPressure UlcerNevusSkin Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin and Connective Tissue DiseasesNeuroendocrine TumorsNeuroectodermal TumorsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Nerve TissueNevi and MelanomasSkin NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteHypotrichosisHair DiseasesPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSkin Diseases, VascularHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System DiseasesNecrobiotic DisordersCollagen DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesGranulomaPathologic ProcessesKeratosisHerpesviridae InfectionsDNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesInfectionsSkin Diseases, ViralSkin Diseases, InfectiousDermatomycosesMycosesBacterial Infections and MycosesSkin Diseases, PapulosquamousAcneiform EruptionsSebaceous Gland DiseasesSkin Ulcer

Study Officials

  • Antonio Martorell, PhD

    Hospital Universitari de Manises

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2026

First Posted

February 24, 2026

Study Start

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion

October 10, 2024

Study Completion

October 10, 2024

Last Updated

February 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations