Acceptability and Feasibility of PSC Model of Serious Illness Communication
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential Effectiveness of a Patient Support Coordinator (PSC)-Facilitated Model of Serious Illness Communication
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, single-arm pilot study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of a novel Patient Support Coordinator (PSC) model for women with advanced or high-risk breast cancer in an outpatient oncology setting. The PSC model is designed to address gaps in serious illness communication by embedding a trained, non-clinical coordinator into routine care pathways to provide longitudinal psychosocial support and facilitate values-based discussions. The primary hypothesis posits that the PSC intervention will be perceived as acceptable by participants, defined by a population median score of ≥12 out of 16 on both the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-4) and the Feeling Heard and Understood (FHU) scale. Additionally, the study assesses feasibility through metrics such as enrollment and retention rates, as well as the successful integration of PSC-documented patient priorities into clinical workflows. By using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, the study aims to generate a complete view of how this lay-led model complements existing supportive care infrastructure at the National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2026
CompletedFebruary 24, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 months
February 19, 2026
February 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intervention acceptability: Feeling Heard and Understood (FHU) Scale
Measurement: Total score on the four-item Feeling Heard and Understood (FHU) survey. Specific definition: A patient-reported outcome measure assessing the perceived quality of the therapeutic alliance. Scores range from 4 to 16, with a total score of ≥12 (equivalent to a mean of 3 out of 4 per item) defined as the threshold for intervention acceptability.
Administered post-intervention, within two weeks following the completion of the three-month intervention phase.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Participant enrolment rate (feasibility)
From initiation of recruitment through to conclusion of enrolment phase (approximately 3 months).
Study Arms (1)
PSC-facilitated supportive listening
EXPERIMENTALThis is a single-arm study where all participants are assigned to the Patient Support Coordinator (PSC) intervention. Enrolled participants engage in a longitudinal supportive care pathway ("PSC model"/ "PSC intervention") consisting of up to eight one-on-one sessions of supportive listening with the PSC delivered over a three-month period.
Interventions
The intervention is a longitudinal, non-clinical supportive care model delivered over a three-month period. The intervention is designed to provide a dedicated space for supportive listening and biographical reflection that complements routine medical consultations. Each session begins with a standardised distress screening using the Distress Thermometer and Problem List (DTPL) to systematically identify participant concerns and provide basic symptom management or lifestyle improvement advice. This is followed by facilitated self-expression sessions focused on emotional grounding and/or collaborative goal-setting, allowing participants to explore and articulate their values at their own pace. Questions relating to goals of care may be explored opportunistically and spontaneously during these sessions, with key insights documented and communicated to the treating oncologist to ensure care alignment and strengthen patient-clinician communication.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of advanced cancer (Stage III or IV) or assessed to be at risk of recurrence by treating oncologist
- Aware of cancer diagnosis
- Proficiency in English or Mandarin
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment preventing provision of informed consent
- Poorly controlled mental health conditions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Centre Singapore
Singapore, 168583, Singapore
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Dr Colin Phipps Diong, MB BCh BAO, MRCP, FRCPath
SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board F (Chairperson)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2026
First Posted
February 24, 2026
Study Start
August 25, 2025
Primary Completion
January 12, 2026
Study Completion
March 30, 2026
Last Updated
February 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share