Comparison of Wound Healing for Diabetic Carbuncle Treated With Incision and Drainage Technique Using Cruciate Incision vs Saucerization Technique Both Followed by Vacuum Assisted Closure.
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two surgical techniques for wound healing in diabetic patients aged 25-70 years with a carbuncle requiring surgical drainage. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in blood loss during surgery between the two techniques? Is there a difference in the duration required for wound healing between the two techniques? Researchers will compare the Incision \& Drainage group to the Saucerization group (both followed by Vacuum Assisted Closure) to see which technique results in better outcomes. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical groups. Receive their assigned surgical procedure (either cruciate incision \& drainage or saucerization). Receive post-operative Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) therapy. Have their wounds assessed during follow-up visits every 14 days until healed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedFebruary 23, 2026
February 1, 2026
2 months
November 23, 2025
February 17, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound Healing
Using Photographic Wound Assessment Tool, max 32, low means better healing
10 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Incision & Drainage Technique Using Cruciate Incision Followed by VAC
ACTIVE COMPARATORSaucerization Technique Followed by VAC
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
This is a less radical procedure focused on establishing a drainage pathway for the underlying pus collection. It involves making a cruciate (cross-shaped) incision over the carbuncle. Unlike saucerization, it does not involve wide excision of tissue. Postoperatively, broad-spectrum antibiotics are administered to control the remaining cellulitis and infection. This technique is associated with less blood and tissue loss, a smaller final scar, and potentially faster initial healing. However, the patient's postoperative hospital stay may be prolonged until the sepsis is adequately controlled with antibiotics.
This is a radical surgical procedure for a diabetic carbuncle. It involves the complete excision of all dead (necrotic) tissue at the center of the infection, along with the surrounding area of cellulitis. The goal is to achieve healthy, bleeding margins and remove the entire septic focus. While this extensive removal may eliminate the need for postoperative antibiotics, it is associated with significant intraoperative blood loss, which can necessitate a blood transfusion. The procedure results in a large wound that heals by secondary intention, often requiring subsequent skin grafting or flap coverage and leading to a larger scar.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients of either gender aged 25-70 years with ASA class 2-3 presenting to the emergency department with carbuncle requiring surgical drainage
You may not qualify if:
- Failure to tolerate VAC
- Patient with co-morbidities like: CKD, CLD, CVA
- Patients not giving consent
- Close to the anal opening
- Wound near the joint
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital Lahore
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2025
First Posted
February 23, 2026
Study Start
January 2, 2026
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share